Oxford United vs Hull City: match statistics
Oxford United vs Hull City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Oxford United played Hull City in Championship (England). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Oxford United: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Hull City: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Oxford United scores 0.92 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Hull City scores 1.59 and concedes 1.46. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Oxford United 54%, Hull City 62%. Over 2.5: Oxford United 49%, Hull City 67%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Hull City has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.25. Oxford United: 11.6 shots per match, Hull City: 10.9.
Match halves
Oxford United: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.31. Hull City: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
Oxford United: 0-15 (8 goals). Hull City: 31-45+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2) — Hull City holds markedly superior seasonal metrics, sitting 5th versus Oxford’s 23rd. Hull's efficiency and productivity favor them: the visitors average 1.58 goals on the road with a 15% conversion rate and 4.37 shots on target per match, while Oxford at home scores only 0.89 goals per match with a 7% conversion and 3.84 shots on target. Note the xG discrepancy versus actual returns: Oxford’s home xG is 1.42 (indicating they should create more chances) but they convert only 0.89 goals, whereas Hull’s away xG is 1.23 yet they score 1.58 goals, reflecting greater finishing efficiency by the visitors. In the last 5 matches Oxford’s form is 3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss, scoring 7 and conceding 5 with an average of 2.0 points per game, while Hull’s last 5 are 2 wins and 3 losses, 6 scored, 9 conceded and 1.2 points per game, which tempers Hull’s seasonal advantage. Considering Hull’s seasonal superiority in conversion (15% vs 7%), lower share of goalless matches (16% vs 42%) and significantly higher league position, I assign a higher probability to an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have high BTTS rates: Oxford 65% and Hull 58%, yielding a combined seasonal pair average of ~62%, above the league BTTS average of 56%. In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 60%; Oxford in those five games scored 1.4 and conceded 1.0 on average, while Hull scored 1.2 and conceded 1.8, indicating Hull is more prone to conceding. xG data shows both sides create chances: xG for Oxford is 1.31 vs 1.23 for Hull, and xG against is 1.44 for Oxford and 1.91 for Hull, i.e. Hull is defensively more exposed. Additionally, 65% of Oxford’s matches and 68% of Hull’s matches finish over 2.5 goals, and the combination of over 2.5 and BTTS occurs in 60% and 57% of cases respectively, reinforcing the both teams to score scenario. Considering seasonal BTTS ~62%, last 5 matches 60%, high share of over 2.5 (~66%) and low clean sheets 20% (Oxford) and 32% (Hull), I recommend a BTTS - Yes with probability 72% vs 28% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal indicators strongly favor more goals: Oxford have 65% of matches with both teams scoring and 65% over 2.5 goals, while Hull have 58% BTTS and 68% over 2.5; on average this implies roughly a 66% probability for Over 2.5. The xG model (Oxford 1.31 xG and Hull 1.23 xG) juxtaposed with xG against (Hull 1.91, Oxford 1.44) yields 1.61 expected goals for Oxford ((1.31+1.91)/2) and 1.34 for Hull ((1.23+1.44)/2), totaling ~2.95 expected goals. Shot and conversion stats support this: Oxford average 11.55 shots and 3.9 on target with a 14% conversion rate, Hull 10.26 shots and 4.37 on target with a 15% conversion. Form over the last 5 matches shows Oxford scored 7 and conceded 5, Hull scored 6 and conceded 9 (gf_last5_home=7, ga_l5_home=5, gf_last5_away=6, ga_l5_away=9), which together with the league average of 2.58 goals underpins a goals market bet. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is to play OVER 2.5 as the best line to back.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely half-time state is a draw: Oxford were level at the break in 40% of their matches and Hull in 42%, giving about a 41% chance of an X at half-time. Despite a stalemate at HT, a strong signal favors the home side winning in the second half — Oxford average 1.5 points in matches decided in the second half versus Hull’s 1.26 points and win 40% of such matches compared to 26% for the away side. Additionally, in the last five fixtures Oxford have a 60% win rate versus Hull’s 40%, while Hull conceded an average of 1.8 goals in those five games compared with 1.0 conceded by Oxford, which increases the risk of goals after the break. Offensively the hosts are supported by an xG of 1.31 versus 1.23 for Hull and an average of 11.55 shots versus 10.26, so the scenario of a draw at half-time and an Oxford victory after 90 minutes (X/1) is rated highest (23%), with the next strongest signal being 1/1 (20%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Oxford United | Hull City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Oxford United is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Oxford United · 1.2 pts / match - Hull City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hull City is 73% better for: goals scored per match.
0.92 goals / match - Oxford United · 1.59 goals / match - Hull City
Oxford United is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - Oxford United · 1.46 goals / match - Hull City
Oxford United scores in 59% of matches (23 of 39 matches), while Hull City keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 39 matches).
Hull City scores in 82% of matches (32 of 39 matches), while Oxford United keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 39 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Oxford United
Over / Under - Hull City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hull City is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / match - Oxford United · 1.49 pts / match - Hull City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Oxford United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 23%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Hull City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 51%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Oxford United
Hull City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Oxford United | Liga | Hull City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.23 | 2.58 | ▲ 3.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 56% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 49% | 50% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 25% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 71% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 76% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Oxford United 0 - 0 - 1 Hull City. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Oxford United vs Hull City?
The Championship match finished Oxford United 1:1 Hull City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Oxford United vs Hull City?
Oxford United score 0.92 goals per game on average and Hull City 1.59. The Championship average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Oxford United's matches and 62% of Hull City's.
What form are Oxford United and Hull City in?
Over the last 5 games Oxford United have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Hull City 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Oxford United vs Hull City?
The statistical background for Oxford United vs Hull City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


