Canada - Canadian Premier LeagueData current as of 08 September 2026

Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC: match statistics

Pacific FC crest
Pacific FC
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Cavalry FC crest
Cavalry FC

Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pacific FC played Cavalry FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match was played on 5 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cavalry FC are the favorites for this match: they sit 2nd in the table while Pacific FC are 5th. In the last 5 matches Cavalry have scored 9 goals (1.8 per game), whereas Pacific have scored 6 (1.2 per game). The defensive gap is even more pronounced: Pacific have conceded 16 goals in those 5 games (3.2 per game), while Cavalry only 6 (1.2 per game). This is reflected in points and results — Pacific average just 0.4 points per game in the last 5 with 0 wins in that run, and Cavalry average 1.6 points per game with 2 wins (record 2-2-1). Given Pacific’s poorer defense and Cavalry’s clearly superior points and goal metrics, I back the visitors as favorites for this match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show strong BTTS indicators over the last 5 matches: Pacific FC 60% (3 of 5) and Cavalry FC 80% (4 of 5), suggesting most fixtures featured goals from both sides. Pacific has averaged 1.2 goals scored and 3.2 goals conceded per match in the last 5 (total 6 scored, 16 conceded), while Cavalry averaged 1.8 scored and 1.2 conceded (total 9 scored, 6 conceded), indicating the visitors are more offensively efficient. xG data reinforce this: Pacific xG_for = 1.02 with xG_against = 1.64, and Cavalry xG_for = 1.51 with xG_against = 1.42, showing Pacific generates fewer quality chances and allows more opportunities to the opponent. Team form ('llddl' for Pacific and 'ddwwl' for Cavalry) and the large gap in goals conceded (3.2 vs 1.2) increase the likelihood of goals at both ends. Based on this, I assess BTTS probability at 80% vs 20% and recommend a "BTTS - Yes" bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In the last 5 matches Pacific FC scored an average of 1.2 goals and conceded 3.2 goals per game, while Cavalry FC scored 1.8 and conceded 1.2. xG from the last 5 matches is 1.02 for Pacific and 1.51 for Cavalry, with xG against 1.64 (Pacific) and 1.42 (Cavalry), yielding expected goals of 1.02 + 1.51 = 2.53. Pacific had 100% of matches over 2.5 goals in the last 5, Cavalry 60%, and both-teams-to-score occurred in 60% and 80% of cases respectively, which favors a multi-goal, both-teams-to-score scenario. Based on this I estimate the probability of Over 1.5 at approx. 90%, Over 2.5 at around 62% and Over 3.5 at around 25%. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation) due to Pacific’s high goals conceded rate (3.2 per game) and Cavalry’s relatively strong offensive numbers (1.8 scored), which together favour the >1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Analysis of the last 5 matches favors Cavalry. The visitors recorded 40% wins and averaged 1.6 points per match, while Pacific have not won any of their last 5 (0% wins, 0.4 points per match). At Half-Time we more often observe a draw: Cavalry were level at the break in 80% of fixtures, Pacific in 40%, and the average first-half goals are 1.8 for the hosts and 1.4 for the visitors (9 and 7 goals in first halves over the last 5). Pacific conceded an average of 3.2 goals per match versus 1.2 conceded by Cavalry, and the visitors performed better after Half-Time (an average of 1.6 points in second halves versus 0.4 for Pacific), which suggests a Cavalry advantage in the second half. On that basis my strongest scenario is a Half-Time draw and a Full-Time victory for the visitors (X/2); I estimate X/2 at 34%, alternatively X/X 20% and 2/2 12%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Pacific FCCavalry FC
13Shots16
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1Shots on target7
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1.13xG1.77
Pacific FCCavalry FC
5Corners3
Pacific FCCavalry FC
34Dangerous attacks38
Pacific FCCavalry FC
14Fouls18
Pacific FCCavalry FC
4Cards3
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Pacific FCYellow cardMatthew Baldisimo
  2. Pacific FCYellow cardTristan Marshall
  3. Cavalry FCGoalTobias Warschewski
  4. Cavalry FCYellow cardAdam Pearlman
  5. Pacific FCYellow cardRoshawn Kadeem Delahaye Juhmi
  6. Cavalry FCYellow cardSergio Andres Camargo
  7. Cavalry FCGoalHarry PatonAssist: Jay Joshua Herdman
  8. Cavalry FCYellow cardGoteh Ntignee
  9. Pacific FCGoalDiego Konincks
  10. Cavalry FCSubstitutionOn: Curtis OforiOff: Goteh Ntignee
  11. Pacific FCSubstitutionOn: Ronan KrattOff: Sami Keshavarz
  12. Pacific FCYellow cardChristian Greco-Taylor

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Pacific FC 1 - 1 - 2 Cavalry FC. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Pacific FC
3 : 3
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
1 : 0
Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC
1 : 0
Pacific FC
Cavalry FC
4 : 0
Pacific FC

FAQ

What was the result of Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?

The Canadian Premier League match finished Pacific FC 1:2 Cavalry FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pacific FC and Cavalry FC?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Pacific FC won 1, Cavalry FC won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?

The statistical background for Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.