South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 13 September 2026

Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City: match statistics

Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Gimhae City crest
Gimhae City

Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paju Citizen played Gimhae City in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 5 April 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Paju Citizen: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Gimhae City: 0-0-4, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paju Citizen scores 1.40 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Gimhae City scores 0.50 and concedes 2.75. League average: 2.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paju Citizen 60%, Gimhae City 50%. Over 2.5: Paju Citizen 60%, Gimhae City 75%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Paju Citizen has higher xG: 1.20 vs 1.16. Paju Citizen: 8.8 shots per match, Gimhae City: 9.5.

Match halves

Paju Citizen: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40. Gimhae City: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.25.

Goals by minute

Paju Citizen: 16-30 (3 goals). Gimhae City: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Paju Citizen are favorites to win at home: they average 1.0 goals scored per home match and concede only 0.5 goals per home match, keeping a clean sheet in 50% of home fixtures. Gimhae City average 0.0 goals scored on the road, concede 2.0 goals per away match and have failed to score in 100% of away games, with a shot conversion rate of 0%. Over the last 5 matches Paju have scored 7 goals and average 1.2 points per match, while Gimhae have conceded 11 goals in their last five fixtures and average just 0.6 points, indicating the visitors’ poorer form. The quality of created chances is comparable (0.93 xG for Paju versus 0.96 xG for Gimhae), but the visitors allow more opportunities for opponents (1.65 xG against them vs 1.39 xG against the hosts), which combined with the visitors’ lack of finishing favors a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes at 72% vs 28% because the statistical signals strongly indicate goals from both sides. The home side has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% and 60% in the last 5 matches, while the league average BTTS is 63%, providing a solid context for both teams to score. Both teams have 0% clean sheets this season; the home team concedes an average of 3.0 goals per match and the visitors 2.0, so the risk of conceding on both sides is high. xG shows 1.22 for the home team vs 0.96 for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches xG_for is 1.17 and 1.25 with xG_against 1.34 and 1.53, indicating chance creation and goal threat from both teams. Despite the visitors’ season conversion rate being 0% and only 2 goals this season, they have scored 5 goals in the last 5 fixtures and average 4.0 shots on target, so a Goal/Goal outcome is realistic.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on home xG 1.22 and away xG 0.96, and xG against 1.82 (Paju) and 1.65 (Gimhae), the calculated forecast is about 1.44 goals for Paju and 1.39 for Gimhae (total 2.83). Additionally, Paju concedes 3.0 goals on average at home and Gimhae concedes 2.0 on the road, which increases the likelihood of goals in this match. In the last 5 matches Paju averaged 1.4 scored and 1.4 conceded (2.8 total), while Gimhae averaged 1.0 scored and 2.2 conceded (3.2 total); the percentage of Over 2.5 goals in the last 5 is 60% for Paju and 80% for Gimhae. Seasonally Paju has 100% of home matches Over 2.5, and Gimhae has 0% of away matches Over 2.5, so signals are mixed, but combined xG and current form lean toward an Over 2.5 selection, which I rate at ~70% probability.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back HT/FT 1/1 (Paju leads at the break and wins). The home side has the superior xG of 1.22 versus 0.96 and better form — 1.2 points per game in the last five for Paju versus 0.6 for Gimhae — which increases the hosts’ chances of victory. At half-time Paju have averaged 1.0 goals in their last five HTs, while Gimhae average 0.6, and the hosts led at the break in 40% of those matches. Gimhae, however, struggle to finish chances: a season goals average of 0.0 and a conversion rate of 0.0 despite averaging 4.0 shots on target, which reduces their ability to mount a turnaround. Paju are vulnerable to goals late on (3 conceded in mins 61–75 and 4 conceded in mins 76–90), but the last five matches show defensive stabilization (conceding 1.4 goals on average), so I have weighted the 1/1 scenario the most.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Paju CitizenGimhae City
13Shots6
Paju CitizenGimhae City
6Shots on target4
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.64xG0.99
Paju CitizenGimhae City
4Corners1
Paju CitizenGimhae City
55Dangerous attacks45
Paju CitizenGimhae City
13Fouls16
Paju CitizenGimhae City
3Cards4
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.4Goals scored / match0.5
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.4Goals conceded / match2.75
Paju CitizenGimhae City
41%Average possession43%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
4.4Shots on target / match3
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.8Shots per match9.5
Paju CitizenGimhae City
4.4Shots on target3
Paju CitizenGimhae City
15.9%Shot conversion5.3%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
41%Possession43%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.2xG for1.16
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.43xG against1.78
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Shooting quality

Paju Citizen: Counter-attackingGimhae City: Balanced
Paju CitizenGimhae City
Accuracy (shots on target)50%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Paju Citizen
LLWWL
Season result split
40% W0% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Gimhae City
LLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-4
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-4
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paju Citizen is 180% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 0.5 goals / match - Gimhae City

Paju Citizen is 96% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 2.75 goals / match - Gimhae City

Paju Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Paju Citizen scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

Gimhae City scoring profile: strong

Gimhae City scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

7Goals scored (season)2
Paju CitizenGimhae City
7Goals conceded (season)11
Paju CitizenGimhae City
2.8Average goals in match3.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
7Goals scored (last 5)2
Paju CitizenGimhae City
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
Paju CitizenGimhae City

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal50%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
60%2 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0%3 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
40%2 goals100%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
20%3 goals50%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0%4 goals25%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

60%BTTS at half-time0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
40%Scored in both halves0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
60%BTTS - last 550%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paju Citizen is 113% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 0.75 pts / match - Gimhae City

Paju Citizen - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Gimhae City - half-time state
25% leading0% draw75% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)0.75
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.8Average goals (1st half)1
Paju CitizenGimhae City
40%Clean sheet before half-time25%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
20%No goal before half-time75%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)2
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1Average goals (2nd half)2.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
60%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
60%No goal after half-time75%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Paju Citizen - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gimhae City - second-half results

0% W25% D75% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.3

Concedes 1.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paju Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Gimhae City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.750.25
Goals scored / match0.30.3
Goals conceded / match0.82.0
Average goals in match1.02.3
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%75%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet25%0%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference-2-7
Half-time: 25% leading - 0% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 25% draw - 75% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Gimhae City
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
4
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Gimhae City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.97
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
33%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
198%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Paju CitizenLigaGimhae City
Average goals in match 2.802.89 3.25
Both teams scored 60%63% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%61% 75%
Clean sheets 20%23% 0%
Goal before half-time 80%85% 100%
Goal after half-time 60%67% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.50
Away goals / match
+-7%
Home attack advantage
+-8%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimhae CityYellow cardMaissa El Hadji Fall
  2. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Taek-Geun LeeOff: Min-Seong Kim
  3. Paju CitizenGoalBorja González TomásAssist: Hyun-Tae Kim
  4. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Jun-Gyu LeeOff: Seung-Min Moon
  5. Paju CitizenGoalJoon-Suk LeeAssist: Jae-jun You
  6. Paju CitizenYellow cardTaek-Geun Lee
  7. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Seung-Jae LeeOff: Seul-Chan Lee
  8. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Hyun-Jin SeolOff: Byung-Kwon Yoon
  9. Gimhae CityYellow cardBruno Xavier Almeida Costa
  10. Paju CitizenGoalBeom-Kyung Choi
  11. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Min-young LeeOff: Beka Mikeltadze
  12. Gimhae CityGoalSeung-Jae LeeAssist: Jae-Yul Yeo
  13. Gimhae CityYellow cardRae-Jun Lee
  14. Paju CitizenYellow cardJae-jun You
  15. Paju CitizenYellow cardChan-ho Lee
  16. Gimhae CityYellow cardMiguel Baggio Cover

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City?

The K League 2 match finished Paju Citizen 3:1 Gimhae City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City?

Paju Citizen score 1.40 goals per game on average and Gimhae City 0.50. The K League 2 average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Paju Citizen's matches and 50% of Gimhae City's.

What form are Paju Citizen and Gimhae City in?

Over the last 5 games Paju Citizen have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Gimhae City 0-0-4 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.