South Korea - K League 2Paju Public StadiumData current as of 06 September 2026

Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen

Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paju Citizen played Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 25 May 2026. Venue: Paju Public Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Paju Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paju Citizen scores 1.27 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.27 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paju Citizen 55%, Gimpo Citizen 55%. Over 2.5: Paju Citizen 55%, Gimpo Citizen 36%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.16. Paju Citizen: 9.1 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 11.3.

Match halves

Paju Citizen: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.45. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Paju Citizen: 16-30 (4 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gimpo is the favorite in this matchup: they sit 7th versus Paju’s 12th and have a superior goal record this season — 14 scored and 11 conceded versus the hosts’ 14 scored and 14 conceded. Away, Gimpo averages 11.27 shots per game and 4.18 shots on target with an average xG of 1.44, while Paju at home records 8.33 shots and 3.17 shots on target with an xG of 1.01, indicating a higher quantity and quality of chances for the visitors. Defensively the visitors also perform better — they concede 1.00 goal per away match versus 1.33 conceded by Paju at home, and expected goals against are 1.17 for Gimpo versus 1.34 for the hosts. In the last five matches Gimpo scored 6 goals compared to Paju’s 4 and have a higher points average over the last five (1.2 pts vs 1.0 pts); additionally Paju failed to score in 33% of home games versus Gimpo’s 18% of away games without scoring. Considering the higher shot volume, superior xG (1.44 vs 1.01) and the visitors’ more solid defence, I assess a Gimpo win as the most likely outcome, although a draw remains plausible given Gimpo’s high away draw rate (45%).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I pick BTTS 'Yes' with a 70% probability vs 30% for 'No', because statistical signals favor goals from both sides. Gimpo has a season BTTS rate of 55% and BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, averaging 1.2 scored and 1.2 conceded in those five games, which strongly supports opponent scoring. Paju in their last 5 matches averages 0.8 goals scored and concedes 1.2 (4 scored and 6 conceded total), and their recent xG is 0.96 vs xG against 1.32, suggesting the hosts are vulnerable to conceding. In the league BTTS occurs in 63% of matches, and seasonally both teams have 14 goals scored each, with Paju conceding 14 and Gimpo 11, which together indicates an open contest. Considering Gimpo's 80% BTTS in the last 5 and the league 63%, the Both Teams To Score scenario looks the strongest.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Paju’s home data are partially incomplete (many seasonal fields = 0), so my forecast relies mainly on the last 5 matches and Gimpo’s statistics. In the last 5 fixtures Paju scored 4 goals (0.8 avg) and conceded 6 (1.2), with a recent xG of 0.96; Gimpo in the same period has 6 goals scored (1.2) and xG 1.07, while seasonally as an away side it averages 1.27 goals and has a seasonal xG of 1.44. The combined xG (0.96+1.07) gives an expected ~2.03 goals in the match and aligns with the actual last-5 average (0.8+1.2=2.0), which increases the probability of at least two goals. Additionally, Gimpo records 4.18 shots on target and 11.27 shots per match and has a season BTTS of 55% (BTTS 80% in the last 5), supporting Over 1.5; however Gimpo’s seasonal Over 2.5 rate is 36% and Over 2.5 occurred only 40% in the last 5, so Over 2.5 is less certain. Based on this I choose Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (I assess Over 1.5 ~78% vs 22%), propose Over 2.5 with lower confidence (42% vs 58%), and consider Over 3.5 unlikely (approx. 18% vs 82%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics indicate a draw at half-time: Gimpo were level at the break in 55% of matches, and Paju were tied after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five appearances, giving a strong signal for an X in the first half. After the break Gimpo have the advantage — they score on average 0.73 goals in the second half and in 82% of away matches at least one goal is scored in the second half, so they more often decide the outcome after 45 minutes. Over the full match Gimpo score on average 1.27 goals with an xG of 1.44 and concede 1.0, while the hosts have 0.0 goals in season statistics, indicating a shooting advantage for the visitors. Therefore the most probable and strongest signal from the data is a draw at half-time and a Gimpo win after 90 minutes, hence the pick X/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
9Shots9
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
4Shots on target2
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.28xG1.15
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
4Corners4
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
60Dangerous attacks61
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
14Fouls15
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0Cards1
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.27Goals scored / match1.27
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.27Goals conceded / match1
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
43%Average possession49%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
3.55Shots on target / match4.18
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.09Shots per match11.27
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
3.55Shots on target4.18
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
14%Shot conversion11.3%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
43%Possession49%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.16xG for1.44
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.44xG against1.17
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Paju Citizen: Counter-attackingGimpo Citizen: Balanced
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)39%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gimpo Citizen is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 1.2 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Paju Citizen
LWLDD
Season result split
36% W18% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-5
1.27 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.01Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Gimpo Citizen
DDLDW
Season result split
36% W45% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-2
1.55 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 1 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Paju Citizen scoring profile: strong

Paju Citizen scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

14Goals scored (season)14
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
14Goals conceded (season)11
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
2.55Average goals in match2.27
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
4Goals scored (last 5)6
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal82%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
45%2 goals27%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
9%3 goals18%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal64%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
36%2 goals27%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
27%3 goals9%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

45%BTTS at half-time27%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
9%BTTS in both halves9%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
27%Scored in both halves27%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
40%BTTS - last 580%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paju Citizen is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.64 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 1.36 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Paju Citizen - half-time state
36% leading55% draw9% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
27% leading55% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.64Points per match (1st half)1.36
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.36Average goals (1st half)1
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
55%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
36%No goal before half-time55%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.64
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.27
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
55%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
64%No goal after half-time36%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Paju Citizen - second-half results

27% W36% R36% P
18
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

45% W27% R27% P
15
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paju Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.41
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Paju CitizenLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 2.552.73 2.27
Both teams scored 55%62% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%56% 36%
Clean sheets 36%24% 36%
Goal before half-time 64%75% 64%
Goal after half-time 64%74% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Hyeon-Byung JeonOff: Julián Andres Bonilla Tovar
  2. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Jae-Woon YoonOff: Dong-Jin Park
  3. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardLuan Dias da Silva
  4. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Min-Ho KimOff: Luke Amos
  5. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Seong-Jun KimOff: Min-Sik Kim
  6. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Dae-Gwang LeeOff: Beom-Kyung Choi
  7. Gimpo CitizenGoalSeong-Jun Kim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Paju Citizen 0:1 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen?

Paju Citizen score 1.27 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.27. The K League 2 average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Paju Citizen's matches and 55% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Paju Citizen and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Paju Citizen have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.