Paju Citizen vs Gyeongnam: match statistics
Paju Citizen vs Gyeongnam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Paju Citizen play Gyeongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 07:00. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Paju Citizen: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Gyeongnam: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Paju Citizen scores 1.00 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Gyeongnam scores 1.47 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Paju Citizen 47%, Gyeongnam 65%. Over 2.5: Paju Citizen 47%, Gyeongnam 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Gyeongnam has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.24. Paju Citizen: 9.8 shots per match, Gyeongnam: 11.7.
Match halves
Paju Citizen: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.41. Gyeongnam: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Paju Citizen: 76-90+ (5 goals). Gyeongnam: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Paju Citizen has the advantage in quality of chances and finishing — at home they score on average 1.5 goals per game and register 4 shots on target with 17% conversion, whereas Gyeongnam away scores 0.5 goals and has 2 shots on target with 5% conversion. In the last 5 matches Paju scored 8 goals and won 3 of 5 (PPG 1.8), while Gyeongnam scored 5 goals, has only 1 win and 1.0 point per game in that period. xG slightly favors the visitors (1.24 vs 1.07 for the hosts), but the discrepancy between xG and actual goals for the visitors (1.24 xG vs 0.5 goals) indicates significant inefficiency and 50% of matches without a goal. Defensively Paju concedes 1.25 goals at home versus 1.0 conceded by Gyeongnam away, so the visitors are slightly more solid at the back, but the hosts' edge in chance quality and lower FTS rate (25% vs 50%) speak in favor of Paju. Considering better conversion (17% vs 5%), form and home stats, I predict a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Paju Citizen | Gyeongnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gyeongnam is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 1.6 pts / match - Gyeongnam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gyeongnam is 47% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 1.47 goals / match - Gyeongnam
Paju Citizen is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 1.47 goals / match - Gyeongnam
Paju Citizen scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).
Gyeongnam scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Paju Citizen
Over / Under — Gyeongnam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paju Citizen is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 1 pts / match - Gyeongnam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Paju Citizen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gyeongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Paju Citizen
Gyeongnam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Paju Citizen | Liga | Gyeongnam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.29 | 2.75 | ▲ 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 61% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 56% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 24% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 73% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | • 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Paju Citizen vs Gyeongnam?
The K League 2 match finished Paju Citizen 2:3 Gyeongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Paju Citizen vs Gyeongnam?
Paju Citizen score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gyeongnam 1.47. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Paju Citizen's matches and 65% of Gyeongnam's.
What form are Paju Citizen and Gyeongnam in?
Over the last 5 games Paju Citizen have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Gyeongnam 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paju Citizen vs Gyeongnam?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.