South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 12 September 2026

Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics

Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen
1 : 3half-time 1:1
Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land

Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paju Citizen played Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Paju Citizen: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paju Citizen scores 1.67 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paju Citizen 67%, Seoul E-Land 50%. Over 2.5: Paju Citizen 67%, Seoul E-Land 67%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.27. Paju Citizen: 9.5 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 11.7.

Match halves

Paju Citizen: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.67. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Paju Citizen: 16-30 (3 goals). Seoul E-Land: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). At home the hosts concede only 0.67 goals per match on average, while Seoul E-Land concede 1.00 on the road; the hosts also have a superior home goal difference (+3) versus the visitors’ +1 away. In attack the hosts register 5 shots on target per home match with a 19% conversion rate, compared to the visitors’ 4.33 SoT and 13% conversion, indicating higher efficiency from the hosts despite fewer attempts. Although Seoul E-Land have a higher away xG (1.27 vs hosts’ xG 1.16) and have scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (vs hosts’ 8), their average away xGA is 1.90, showing vulnerability to opponent chance creation. Given the better home defense, higher conversion and advantage in goal difference, I assign roughly a 55% probability to the home win, 25% to a draw and 20% to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The edge for the "Both Teams To Score" scenario stems from strong attacking indicators and a league-wide trend: the league has 65% BTTS matches, and Seoul E-Land register BTTS in 67% of away games. Seoul concedes on average 1.90 xG per match, while Paju generates 1.52 xG at home and scores 2.0 goals per match on average, and Seoul creates 1.27 xG and scores 1.33 goals — both teams therefore produce chances (1.52 vs 1.27 xG). The counterweight is that Paju have 67% clean sheets at home and a season BTTS share for Paju of only 33%, which lowers the probability of both scoring. However, in the last 5 matches Paju had BTTS in 60% (3 of 5) and Seoul in 40% (2 of 5), and both teams scored 8 and 9 goals respectively in that period, which further supports the "Yes" outcome (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals are calculated based on xG: Paju has xG_for 1.52, Seoul xG_for 1.27; Seoul concedes on average 1.90 xG per match while Paju concedes 1.11, which yields an estimate of 1.71 goals for Paju and 1.19 for Seoul, totaling 2.90. Season averages confirm offensive profiles: Paju scores 2.00 goals per match, Seoul 1.33, and both teams have 67% of matches over 2.5 goals (league average 2.94 goals/match). Paju averages 13.0 shots and 5.33 on target with a 15% conversion, Seoul 10.33 and 4.33 with a 13% conversion — combined with Seoul conceding 1.90 xG this increases the likelihood of goal-scoring situations. Based on total xG=2.90 the probability distribution suggests roughly 79% chance of >1.5, ~55% for >2.5 and ~33% for >3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 2.5 goals. Risk is mitigated by Paju’s high clean sheet rate (67%), which may reduce the probability of both teams scoring, but the last 5 matches balance (Paju 8 scored and 5 conceded, Seoul 9 scored and 4 conceded) and the high share of overs in the league support the Over 2.5 side.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is the home side’s first-half advantage: Paju led at the break in 3 of 3 matches (100%) and did not concede in the first half (0.0 goals conceded on average), scoring 3 first-half goals. Offensively Paju posts higher metrics than Seoul – xG 1.52 versus 1.27, averaging 13.0 shots and 5.33 on target compared to the visitors’ 10.33 and 4.33, with a conversion rate of 15% versus 13%. Seoul are vulnerable defensively (allowing 1.9 xG per match on average) and have only a 33% clean-sheet rate on the road, which increases the hosts’ chances of maintaining a lead at the break. Given Paju’s 67% home win rate and the figures above, the most likely scenario is a home lead at half-time and a home win at full-time (1/1), estimated here at approximately 38%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
9Shots16
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1Shots on target7
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0.79xG1.72
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
3Corners10
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
20Dangerous attacks30
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
17Fouls17
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1Cards2
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1.67Goals scored / match1.67
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1.33Goals conceded / match1
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
42%Average possession45%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
4.67Shots on target / match4.83
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match11.67
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
4.67Shots on target4.83
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
17.5%Shot conversion14.3%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
42%Possession45%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1.27xG for1.4
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1.36xG against1.51
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Shooting quality

Paju Citizen: Counter-attackingSeoul E-Land: Counter-attacking
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
Accuracy (shots on target)49%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Paju Citizen
LWWLW
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-3
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
LWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Seoul E-Land
WLDWW
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 1 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Paju Citizen scoring profile: strong

Paju Citizen scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

10Goals scored (season)10
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
8Goals conceded (season)6
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
3Average goals in match2.67
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
8Goals scored (last 5)9
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal83%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
67%2 goals50%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
17%3 goals33%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal50%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
33%2 goals33%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
17%3 goals17%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time33%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
17%BTTS in both halves0%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
50%Scored in both halves50%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
60%BTTS - last 540%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.83 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 2.33 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Paju Citizen - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing
Seoul E-Land - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.83Points per match (1st half)2.33
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1Goals scored (1st half)1
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1.67Average goals (1st half)1.33
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
50%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
17%No goal before half-time17%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.33
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
50%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
50%No goal after half-time50%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Paju Citizen - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paju Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Paju CitizenLigaSeoul E-Land
Average goals in match 3.002.94 2.67
Both teams scored 67%64% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%62% 67%
Clean sheets 17%22% 50%
Goal before half-time 83%84% 83%
Goal after half-time 67%70% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.50
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Paju CitizenGoalJae-jun You
  2. Seoul E-LandYellow cardJae-Yong Park
  3. Seoul E-LandGoalJi-Ung BaekAssist: Osmar Barba Ibáñez
  4. Paju CitizenYellow cardTaek-Geun Lee
  5. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Hyun KimOff: Jae-Yong Park
  6. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Gyung-Jun ByeonOff: Hyeon-Je Kang
  7. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Min-ki LeeOff: Taek-Geun Lee
  8. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Luke AmosOff: Dae-Gwang Lee
  9. Seoul E-LandGoalGyung-Jun ByeonAssist: In-pyo Oh
  10. Seoul E-LandYellow cardIn-pyo Oh

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land?

The K League 2 match finished Paju Citizen 1:3 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land?

Paju Citizen score 1.67 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.67. The K League 2 average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Paju Citizen's matches and 50% of Seoul E-Land's.

What form are Paju Citizen and Seoul E-Land in?

Over the last 5 games Paju Citizen have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.