Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Pakhtakor vs Nasaf: match statistics

Pakhtakor crest
Pakhtakor
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Nasaf crest
Nasaf

Pakhtakor vs Nasaf: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pakhtakor play Nasaf in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 28 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Pakhtakor: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Nasaf: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pakhtakor scores 1.92 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Nasaf scores 1.25 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pakhtakor 69%, Nasaf 58%. Over 2.5: Pakhtakor 54%, Nasaf 33%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Pakhtakor has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.39. Pakhtakor: 13.2 shots per match, Nasaf: 12.1.

Match halves

Pakhtakor: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.00. Nasaf: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Pakhtakor: 31-45+ (5 goals). Nasaf: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

I back the hosts (1). Pakhtakor is in clearly better form — they have won all 5 of their last matches (an average of 3 points per game) and have an 80% home win rate (8 wins, 1 loss), while Nasaf have only 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses in their last 5 (an average of 1 point per game). Offensively the hosts create more opportunities: they score an average of 2.2 goals at home with 6 shots on target and 14.2 attempts per match (15% conversion), whereas Nasaf away average 1.25 goals with 3.75 shots on target and 10.5 attempts (12% conversion). Quality of chances also favors Pakhtakor — average xG for the hosts is 1.74 versus 1.24 for the visitors, and Nasaf have conceded 7 goals in their last 5 matches compared to 4 conceded by the hosts, indicating a worse defensive trend for the visitors. Additionally, possession control 64% vs 46% and a higher number of shots on target (6 vs 3.75) sustain the hosts' advantage, therefore I assess the probability of a Pakhtakor win at 70%, a draw 20% and a Nasaf win 10%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
PakhtakorNasaf
11Shots8
PakhtakorNasaf
3Shots on target3
PakhtakorNasaf
1.22xG1.02
PakhtakorNasaf
8Corners4
PakhtakorNasaf
43Dangerous attacks42
PakhtakorNasaf
7Fouls17
PakhtakorNasaf
0Cards4
PakhtakorNasaf

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.92Goals scored / match1.25
PakhtakorNasaf
1.08Goals conceded / match1
PakhtakorNasaf
59%Average possession51%
PakhtakorNasaf
4.92Shots on target / match3.92
PakhtakorNasaf

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.23Shots per match12.08
PakhtakorNasaf
4.92Shots on target3.92
PakhtakorNasaf
14.5%Shot conversion10.3%
PakhtakorNasaf
59%Possession51%
PakhtakorNasaf
1.55xG for1.39
PakhtakorNasaf
1.18xG against1.39
PakhtakorNasaf

Shooting quality

Pakhtakor: Efficient finishingNasaf: Balanced
PakhtakorNasaf
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pakhtakor is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Pakhtakor · 1 pts / match - Nasaf

Pakhtakor
WDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
69% W23% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-1
2.31 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Nasaf
LLDDW
Season result split
33% W42% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-3
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pakhtakor is 54% better for: goals scored per match.

1.92 goals / match - Pakhtakor · 1.25 goals / match - Nasaf

Nasaf is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.08 goals / match - Pakhtakor · 1 goals / match - Nasaf

Pakhtakor scoring profile: very strong

Pakhtakor scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

Nasaf scoring profile: very strong

Nasaf scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Pakhtakor keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

25Goals scored (season)15
PakhtakorNasaf
14Goals conceded (season)12
PakhtakorNasaf
3Average goals in match2.25
PakhtakorNasaf
7Goals scored (last 5)8
PakhtakorNasaf
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
PakhtakorNasaf

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal83%
PakhtakorNasaf
62%2 goals33%
PakhtakorNasaf
23%3 goals8%
PakhtakorNasaf
15%4 goals0%
PakhtakorNasaf

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal67%
PakhtakorNasaf
31%2 goals25%
PakhtakorNasaf
0%3 goals8%
PakhtakorNasaf
0%4 goals0%
PakhtakorNasaf

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time25%
PakhtakorNasaf
8%BTTS in both halves8%
PakhtakorNasaf
38%Scored in both halves17%
PakhtakorNasaf

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
PakhtakorNasaf
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PakhtakorNasaf
80%BTTS - last 580%
PakhtakorNasaf

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
PakhtakorNasaf
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
PakhtakorNasaf
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PakhtakorNasaf

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
PakhtakorNasaf
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
PakhtakorNasaf
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
PakhtakorNasaf

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pakhtakor is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.85 pts / match - Pakhtakor · 1 pts / match - Nasaf

Pakhtakor - half-time state
46% leading46% draw8% trailing
Nasaf - half-time state
8% leading75% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.85Points per match (1st half)1
PakhtakorNasaf
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.42
PakhtakorNasaf
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
PakhtakorNasaf
1.31Average goals (1st half)0.83
PakhtakorNasaf
69%Clean sheet before half-time58%
PakhtakorNasaf
31%No goal before half-time67%
PakhtakorNasaf

After half-time (2nd half)

1.62Points per match (2nd half)1.58
PakhtakorNasaf
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
PakhtakorNasaf
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
PakhtakorNasaf
1.69Average goals (2nd half)1.42
PakhtakorNasaf
46%Clean sheet after half-time50%
PakhtakorNasaf
38%No goal after half-time33%
PakhtakorNasaf

Pakhtakor - second-half results

46% W23% R31% P
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nasaf - second-half results

42% W33% R25% P
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding413%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pakhtakor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Nasaf - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pakhtakor
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
1
31-45
5
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Nasaf
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pakhtakor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Nasaf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

PakhtakorLigaNasaf
Average goals in match 3.002.59 2.25
Both teams scored 69%55% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%53% 33%
Clean sheets 23%26% 33%
Goal before half-time 77%69% 50%
Goal after half-time 85%79% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Pakhtakor 1 - 1 - 0 Nasaf. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK Pakhtakor Tashkent
1 : 0
FC Nasaf Qarshi
FC Nasaf Qarshi
2 : 2
FK Pakhtakor Tashkent

FAQ

What was the result of Pakhtakor vs Nasaf?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Pakhtakor 2:2 Nasaf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pakhtakor and Nasaf?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pakhtakor won 1, Nasaf won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pakhtakor vs Nasaf?

Pakhtakor score 1.92 goals per game on average and Nasaf 1.25. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Pakhtakor's matches and 58% of Nasaf's.

What form are Pakhtakor and Nasaf in?

Over the last 5 games Pakhtakor have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Nasaf 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pakhtakor vs Nasaf?

The statistical background for Pakhtakor vs Nasaf — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.