Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 24 July 2026

Pakhtakor vs Qizilqum: match statistics

Pakhtakor crest
Pakhtakor
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum
155%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

Pakhtakor presents better form in the last five matches, earning 2.2 points per match compared to Qizilqum's 1.4 points. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five meetings (3 wins, 2 draws), giving them a solid WWDWD streak. Qizilqum has a more unstable WLWLD form and a significantly worse goal difference in recent matches, conceding 11 goals while scoring only 8. Pakhtakor scores a similar number of goals (7 in the last 5 matches) but concedes far fewer (only 3 goals), evidencing a better defense. Given the form advantage, defensive efficiency, and the home crowd factor, Pakhtakor is the favorite for this encounter.

Pakhtakor vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pakhtakor play Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 27 February 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Pakhtakor: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Qizilqum: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pakhtakor scores 1.92 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Qizilqum scores 0.77 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pakhtakor 69%, Qizilqum 38%. Over 2.5: Pakhtakor 54%, Qizilqum 38%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Pakhtakor has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.19. Pakhtakor: 13.4 shots per match, Qizilqum: 9.8.

Match halves

Pakhtakor: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.00. Qizilqum: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Pakhtakor: 31-45+ (5 goals). Qizilqum: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Pakhtakor presents better form in the last five matches, earning 2.2 points per match compared to Qizilqum's 1.4 points. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five meetings (3 wins, 2 draws), giving them a solid WWDWD streak. Qizilqum has a more unstable WLWLD form and a significantly worse goal difference in recent matches, conceding 11 goals while scoring only 8. Pakhtakor scores a similar number of goals (7 in the last 5 matches) but concedes far fewer (only 3 goals), evidencing a better defense. Given the form advantage, defensive efficiency, and the home crowd factor, Pakhtakor is the favorite for this encounter.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

78Possession (%)22
PakhtakorQizilqum
20Shots7
PakhtakorQizilqum
7Shots on target1
PakhtakorQizilqum
2.18xG0.76
PakhtakorQizilqum
5Corners1
PakhtakorQizilqum
60Dangerous attacks34
PakhtakorQizilqum
13Fouls6
PakhtakorQizilqum
0Cards0
PakhtakorQizilqum

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.92Goals scored / match0.77
PakhtakorQizilqum
1.08Goals conceded / match1.38
PakhtakorQizilqum
59%Average possession41%
PakhtakorQizilqum
4.92Shots on target / match2.77
PakhtakorQizilqum

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.38Shots per match9.85
PakhtakorQizilqum
4.92Shots on target2.77
PakhtakorQizilqum
14.4%Shot conversion7.8%
PakhtakorQizilqum
59%Possession41%
PakhtakorQizilqum
1.56xG for1.19
PakhtakorQizilqum
1.17xG against1.37
PakhtakorQizilqum

Shooting quality

Pakhtakor: Efficient finishingQizilqum: Balanced
PakhtakorQizilqum
Accuracy (shots on target)37%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pakhtakor is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Pakhtakor · 1 pts / match - Qizilqum

Pakhtakor
WDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
69% W23% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-1
2.31 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Qizilqum
WDLLD
Season result split
31% W15% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-7
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pakhtakor is 149% better for: goals scored per match.

1.92 goals / match - Pakhtakor · 0.77 goals / match - Qizilqum

Pakhtakor is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.08 goals / match - Pakhtakor · 1.38 goals / match - Qizilqum

Pakhtakor scoring profile: very strong

Pakhtakor scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

Qizilqum scoring profile: strong

Qizilqum scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Pakhtakor keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

25Goals scored (season)10
PakhtakorQizilqum
14Goals conceded (season)18
PakhtakorQizilqum
3Average goals in match2.15
PakhtakorQizilqum
7Goals scored (last 5)4
PakhtakorQizilqum
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
PakhtakorQizilqum

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal54%
PakhtakorQizilqum
62%2 goals23%
PakhtakorQizilqum
23%3 goals0%
PakhtakorQizilqum
15%4 goals0%
PakhtakorQizilqum

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal77%
PakhtakorQizilqum
31%2 goals38%
PakhtakorQizilqum
0%3 goals15%
PakhtakorQizilqum
0%4 goals8%
PakhtakorQizilqum

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time15%
PakhtakorQizilqum
8%BTTS in both halves0%
PakhtakorQizilqum
38%Scored in both halves15%
PakhtakorQizilqum

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
PakhtakorQizilqum
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
PakhtakorQizilqum
80%BTTS - last 560%
PakhtakorQizilqum

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
PakhtakorQizilqum
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
PakhtakorQizilqum
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
PakhtakorQizilqum

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
PakhtakorQizilqum
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
PakhtakorQizilqum
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PakhtakorQizilqum

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pakhtakor is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.85 pts / match - Pakhtakor · 1.08 pts / match - Qizilqum

Pakhtakor - half-time state
46% leading46% draw8% trailing
Qizilqum - half-time state
23% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.85Points per match (1st half)1.08
PakhtakorQizilqum
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.38
PakhtakorQizilqum
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
PakhtakorQizilqum
1.31Average goals (1st half)1.15
PakhtakorQizilqum
69%Clean sheet before half-time46%
PakhtakorQizilqum
31%No goal before half-time69%
PakhtakorQizilqum

After half-time (2nd half)

1.62Points per match (2nd half)1.15
PakhtakorQizilqum
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
PakhtakorQizilqum
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
PakhtakorQizilqum
1.69Average goals (2nd half)1
PakhtakorQizilqum
46%Clean sheet after half-time54%
PakhtakorQizilqum
38%No goal after half-time62%
PakhtakorQizilqum

Pakhtakor - second-half results

46% W23% R31% P
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qizilqum - second-half results

23% W46% R31% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pakhtakor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Qizilqum - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.40.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pakhtakor
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
1
31-45
5
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pakhtakor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

PakhtakorLigaQizilqum
Average goals in match 3.002.63 2.15
Both teams scored 69%57% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%53% 38%
Clean sheets 23%25% 23%
Goal before half-time 77%69% 69%
Goal after half-time 85%78% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Pakhtakor 2 - 0 - 0 Qizilqum. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FK Pakhtakor Tashkent
3 : 0
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
0 : 3
FK Pakhtakor Tashkent

FAQ

What was the result of Pakhtakor vs Qizilqum?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Pakhtakor 2:0 Qizilqum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pakhtakor and Qizilqum?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pakhtakor won 2, Qizilqum won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pakhtakor vs Qizilqum?

Pakhtakor score 1.92 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 0.77. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Pakhtakor's matches and 38% of Qizilqum's.

What form are Pakhtakor and Qizilqum in?

Over the last 5 games Pakhtakor have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Qizilqum 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pakhtakor vs Qizilqum?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pakhtakor vs Qizilqum: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.