Paksi SE vs Zalaegerszegi TE: match statistics
Zalaegerszegi TE presents a significantly better form in the last five matches with a record of 3 wins and 2 draws (2.2 PPG), while Paksi SE is in a crisis with only 1 point in their last 5 fixtures (4 defeats, 1 draw). The hosts have conceded as many as 14 goals in their last five matches, which proves serious defensive problems. Zalaegerszegi has a better away record (42% win rate, 33% clean sheets) than Paksi's home record (42% win rate, but only 8% clean sheets), as well as better defensive stability in away matches (an average of 1.25 goals conceded). Despite the hosts' advantage in home xG (2.3 vs 1.41 away xG for the visitors), the current form and defensive solidity of Zalaegerszegi advocate for their victory. Additionally, the visitors have a positive away goal difference (+2) and remain undefeated in their last 5 matches, which makes them the favorites for this encounter.
Paksi SE vs Zalaegerszegi TE: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Paksi SE played Zalaegerszegi TE in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 14 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Paksi SE: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Zalaegerszegi TE: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Paksi SE scores 1.84 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Zalaegerszegi TE scores 1.52 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Paksi SE 72%, Zalaegerszegi TE 60%. Over 2.5: Paksi SE 68%, Zalaegerszegi TE 48%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Paksi SE has higher xG: 2.04 vs 1.50. Paksi SE: 16.6 shots per match, Zalaegerszegi TE: 12.8.
Match halves
Paksi SE: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 1.12. Zalaegerszegi TE: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.08.
Goals by minute
Paksi SE: 76-90+ (15 goals). Zalaegerszegi TE: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NB I: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Zalaegerszegi TE presents a significantly better form in the last five matches with a record of 3 wins and 2 draws (2.2 PPG), while Paksi SE is in a crisis with only 1 point in their last 5 fixtures (4 defeats, 1 draw). The hosts have conceded as many as 14 goals in their last five matches, which proves serious defensive problems. Zalaegerszegi has a better away record (42% win rate, 33% clean sheets) than Paksi's home record (42% win rate, but only 8% clean sheets), as well as better defensive stability in away matches (an average of 1.25 goals conceded). Despite the hosts' advantage in home xG (2.3 vs 1.41 away xG for the visitors), the current form and defensive solidity of Zalaegerszegi advocate for their victory. Additionally, the visitors have a positive away goal difference (+2) and remain undefeated in their last 5 matches, which makes them the favorites for this encounter.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Paksi SE | Zalaegerszegi TE | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Zalaegerszegi TE is 1000% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Paksi SE · 2.2 pts / match - Zalaegerszegi TE
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Paksi SE is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
1.84 goals / match - Paksi SE · 1.52 goals / match - Zalaegerszegi TE
Zalaegerszegi TE is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.48 goals / match - Paksi SE · 1.24 goals / match - Zalaegerszegi TE
Paksi SE scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Zalaegerszegi TE keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).
Zalaegerszegi TE scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while Paksi SE keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Paksi SE
Over / Under - Zalaegerszegi TE
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paksi SE is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Paksi SE · 1.16 pts / match - Zalaegerszegi TE
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Paksi SE - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Zalaegerszegi TE - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Paksi SE
Zalaegerszegi TE
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).
Teams vs league
| Paksi SE | Liga | Zalaegerszegi TE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.32 | 2.99 | ▼ 2.76 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 61% | • 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 60% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 21% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 69% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Paksi SE 0 - 1 - 1 Zalaegerszegi TE. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Paksi SE vs Zalaegerszegi TE?
The NB I match finished Paksi SE 1:1 Zalaegerszegi TE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Paksi SE and Zalaegerszegi TE?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Paksi SE won 0, Zalaegerszegi TE won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Paksi SE vs Zalaegerszegi TE?
Paksi SE score 1.84 goals per game on average and Zalaegerszegi TE 1.52. The NB I average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Paksi SE's matches and 60% of Zalaegerszegi TE's.
What form are Paksi SE and Zalaegerszegi TE in?
Over the last 5 games Paksi SE have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Zalaegerszegi TE 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paksi SE vs Zalaegerszegi TE?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.