Palestino vs Coquimbo Unido: match statistics
Palestino vs Coquimbo Unido: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Palestino played Coquimbo Unido in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Municipal de La Cisterna. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Palestino: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Coquimbo Unido: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Palestino scores 1.44 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Coquimbo Unido scores 1.47 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.85 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Palestino 56%, Coquimbo Unido 60%. Over 2.5: Palestino 50%, Coquimbo Unido 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Coquimbo Unido has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.46. Palestino: 14.4 shots per match, Coquimbo Unido: 13.9.
Match halves
Palestino: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.63. Coquimbo Unido: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.87.
Goals by minute
Palestino: 16-30 (6 goals). Coquimbo Unido: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Looking at the numbers, the slight favorite is Palestino: at home the team averages 1.88 goals and has an average xG of 1.67 with 5.75 shots on target per match, while Coquimbo away records 1.5 goals and xG 1.3 with 4 shots on target. The home defense looks better in the stats — Palestino concedes 0.88 goals per match at their stadium and keeps clean sheets in 38% of games, whereas the visitors concede 1.5 goals away and have only 13% clean sheets. Still, the visitors are in better recent form: Coquimbo in the last 5 matches has 2 wins and 3 draws (0 losses), scoring 7 and conceding 3, yielding 1.8 points per game, while Palestino in that period scored 7, conceded 8 and averages 1.4 points per game. Conversion difference is small (11% versus 13%), but the low percentage of matches without a goal for the visitors (13% vs 38%) increases their chances to score. Considering superior xG numbers, a higher number of shots and the hosts’ solid defense (+8 goal difference in home matches), I give a minimal edge to Palestino and back the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show differing BTTS trends: Palestino records BTTS in 43% of matches this season, while Coquimbo in 75%, with the league average at 50%. In the last 5 rounds both sides had BTTS in 60% of matches, confirming a short-term trend for both to exchange goals. Palestino generates more chances (avg xG 1.79, 16.43 shots and 5.29 shots on target) than Coquimbo (xG 1.30, 11.75 shots and 4.0 shots on target), so the home side has the tools to score. Defensive stats are mixed: across the season Palestino concedes 0.86 goals on average, Coquimbo 1.5, but in the last 5 matches Palestino conceded 8 goals (1.6 per match) while Coquimbo only 3 (0.6 per match). Considering Coquimbo’s high season BTTS rate of 75%, the similar season goal totals (Palestino 23 vs Coquimbo 22) and 60% BTTS in the last five matches for both teams, the stronger signal is BTTS - Yes — I assess the probability of BTTS at 70% versus 30% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals are 1.55 for Palestino and 1.23 for Coquimbo (total 2.78), calculated as the average of home attack xG 1.79 and away defense xG 1.31, and away attack xG 1.30 and home defense xG 1.16. Season-long stats show Palestino has Over 1.5 in 57% of matches and Coquimbo in 75%, while Over 2.5 occurs for the home side in 43% and the away side in 63%, which favors a scenario above 1.5 goals and gives a moderate edge to Over 2.5. Additionally Palestino averages 16.43 shots and 5.29 on target, and Coquimbo 11.75 and 4.0; in the last 5 matches Palestino scored 7 and conceded 8, and Coquimbo scored 7 and conceded 3, suggesting open play and elevated goal risk. Based on this I assign Over 1.5 the highest probability (~84%), Over 2.5 about ~62%, and Over 3.5 unlikely (~32%), hence the recommendation to play Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Palestino has a clear advantage at the break — they led at half-time in 4 of their home matches (57%), scoring on average 0.86 goals before the break and conceding only 0.14, which strongly supports the hosts leading after 45 minutes. Coquimbo led at half-time in only 1 match (13%), but they are dangerous after the break — they average 1.13 goals in the second half and in 100% of their matches there is at least one goal after the break, which increases the risk of an equalizer or a turnaround. Additionally, Palestino generate higher xG (1.79 vs 1.30) and more shots on target (5.29 vs 4.00), favoring them to maintain the lead and win at Full-Time. Considering the 57% chance of Palestino leading at Half-Time and the xG/SOT advantage, but also the visitors’ 1.13 average second-half goals, the most probable selection is 1/1 (HT/FT).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Palestino | Coquimbo Unido | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Palestino is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Palestino · 1.6 pts / match - Coquimbo Unido
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Coquimbo Unido is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.44 goals / match - Palestino · 1.2 goals / match - Coquimbo Unido
Palestino scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Coquimbo Unido keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
Coquimbo Unido scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Palestino keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Palestino
Over / Under — Coquimbo Unido
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Palestino is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / match - Palestino · 1.53 pts / match - Coquimbo Unido
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Palestino - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Coquimbo Unido - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Palestino
Coquimbo Unido
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Palestino | Liga | Coquimbo Unido | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.88 | 2.85 | ▼ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 50% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 54% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 28% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 75% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Palestino 0 - 1 - 2 Coquimbo Unido. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Palestino vs Coquimbo Unido?
The Primera División match finished Palestino 2:1 Coquimbo Unido. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Palestino and Coquimbo Unido?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Palestino won 0, Coquimbo Unido won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Palestino vs Coquimbo Unido?
Palestino score 1.44 goals per game on average and Coquimbo Unido 1.47. The Primera División average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Palestino's matches and 60% of Coquimbo Unido's.
What form are Palestino and Coquimbo Unido in?
Over the last 5 games Palestino have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Coquimbo Unido 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Palestino vs Coquimbo Unido?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Palestino vs Coquimbo Unido: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.