Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 18 September 2026

Pamba Jiji vs Azam: match statistics

Pamba Jiji crest
Pamba Jiji
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Azam crest
Azam
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Pamba Jiji presents impressive home form with 71% of matches won at home and merely 0% losses, making them a very dangerous rival at their own stadium. Azam, meanwhile, remains unbeaten this season (0 losses overall) and shows excellent form in the last five matches (2.4 points per match). The guests are characterized by a solid defense, conceding an average of only 0.67 goals per away match, which may effectively stop the hosts' attack. The predicted draw results from the confrontation of Pamba Jiji's strong home form with the extremely difficult-to-beat Azam, who finish 67% of away matches with a split of points. The xG statistics of both teams are close (1.2 vs 1.3), which additionally supports the scenario of a balanced encounter.

Pamba Jiji vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pamba Jiji played Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 2 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Pamba Jiji: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Azam: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pamba Jiji scores 1.14 and concedes 0.79 goals per match. Azam scores 1.56 and concedes 0.22. League average: 1.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pamba Jiji 29%, Azam 22%. Over 2.5: Pamba Jiji 43%, Azam 22%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 29%.

xG, shots and style

Azam has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.07. Pamba Jiji: 3.8 shots per match, Azam: 10.0.

Match halves

Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.43. Azam: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Pamba Jiji: 0-15 (6 goals). Azam: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.91 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 29%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pamba Jiji presents impressive home form with 71% of matches won at home and merely 0% losses, making them a very dangerous rival at their own stadium. Azam, meanwhile, remains unbeaten this season (0 losses overall) and shows excellent form in the last five matches (2.4 points per match). The guests are characterized by a solid defense, conceding an average of only 0.67 goals per away match, which may effectively stop the hosts' attack. The predicted draw results from the confrontation of Pamba Jiji's strong home form with the extremely difficult-to-beat Azam, who finish 67% of away matches with a split of points. The xG statistics of both teams are close (1.2 vs 1.3), which additionally supports the scenario of a balanced encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Pamba JijiAzam
9Shots6
Pamba JijiAzam
3Shots on target2
Pamba JijiAzam
1.54xG1.02
Pamba JijiAzam
3Corners2
Pamba JijiAzam
104Dangerous attacks68
Pamba JijiAzam
-1Fouls-1
Pamba JijiAzam
-1Cards-1
Pamba JijiAzam

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.14Goals scored / match1.56
Pamba JijiAzam
0.79Goals conceded / match0.22
Pamba JijiAzam
40%Average possession51%
Pamba JijiAzam
1.93Shots on target / match3.33
Pamba JijiAzam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.79Shots per match10
Pamba JijiAzam
1.93Shots on target3.33
Pamba JijiAzam
30.2%Shot conversion15.6%
Pamba JijiAzam
40%Possession51%
Pamba JijiAzam
1.07xG for1.6
Pamba JijiAzam
1xG against0.74
Pamba JijiAzam

Shooting quality

Pamba Jiji: Counter-attackingAzam: Efficient finishing
Pamba JijiAzam
Accuracy (shots on target)51%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.280.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.590.47

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Azam is 86% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 2.6 pts / match - Azam

Pamba Jiji
LDLWW
Season result split
43% W36% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-3
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Azam
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
56% W44% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-0
2.11 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 away
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.77BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

1.14 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 1.56 goals / match - Azam

Azam is 259% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.79 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 0.22 goals / match - Azam

Pamba Jiji scoring profile: more difficult

Pamba Jiji scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 78% (7 of 9 matches).

Azam scoring profile: strong

Azam scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 matches).

16Goals scored (season)14
Pamba JijiAzam
11Goals conceded (season)2
Pamba JijiAzam
1.93Average goals in match1.78
Pamba JijiAzam
5Goals scored (last 5)10
Pamba JijiAzam
5Goals conceded (last 5)0
Pamba JijiAzam

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal78%
Pamba JijiAzam
29%2 goals56%
Pamba JijiAzam
21%3 goals22%
Pamba JijiAzam
0%4 goals0%
Pamba JijiAzam

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal22%
Pamba JijiAzam
14%2 goals0%
Pamba JijiAzam
14%3 goals0%
Pamba JijiAzam
0%4 goals0%
Pamba JijiAzam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time0%
Pamba JijiAzam
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Pamba JijiAzam
14%Scored in both halves33%
Pamba JijiAzam

BTTS and goal count

7%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Pamba JijiAzam
36%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
Pamba JijiAzam
20%BTTS - last 50%
Pamba JijiAzam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Pamba JijiAzam
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Pamba JijiAzam
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Pamba JijiAzam

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Pamba JijiAzam
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time11%
Pamba JijiAzam
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Pamba JijiAzam

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 104% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 2.33 pts / match - Azam

Pamba Jiji - half-time state
14% leading71% draw14% trailing
Azam - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)2.33
Pamba JijiAzam
0.36Goals scored (1st half)1
Pamba JijiAzam
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0
Pamba JijiAzam
0.64Average goals (1st half)1
Pamba JijiAzam
71%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Pamba JijiAzam
71%No goal before half-time33%
Pamba JijiAzam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.67
Pamba JijiAzam
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Pamba JijiAzam
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.22
Pamba JijiAzam
0.86Average goals (2nd half)0.78
Pamba JijiAzam
71%Clean sheet after half-time78%
Pamba JijiAzam
71%No goal after half-time56%
Pamba JijiAzam

Pamba Jiji - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
16
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding307%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Azam - second-half results

44% W33% D22% L
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 56%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pamba Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Azam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.20
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+6+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pamba Jiji
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Azam
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
4
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
26%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pamba Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 38% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.86
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
229%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
18%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Pamba JijiLigaAzam
Average goals in match 1.931.91 1.78
Both teams scored 29%31% 22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%29% 22%
Clean sheets 50%42% 78%
Goal before half-time 43%51% 67%
Goal after half-time 57%57% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.91
Average goals per match
31%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / match
0.68
Away goals / match
+81%
Home attack advantage
+45%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Other recorded players

Faisal Salum⚽ 1
Jean-Jacques Ngita⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Pamba JijiGoalHimid Mao Mkami
  2. AzamGoalJean-Jacques Ngita
  3. AzamGoalFaisal Salum

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Pamba Jiji vs Azam?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Pamba Jiji 2:2 Azam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pamba Jiji vs Azam?

Pamba Jiji score 1.14 goals per game on average and Azam 1.56. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Pamba Jiji's matches and 22% of Azam's.

What form are Pamba Jiji and Azam in?

Over the last 5 games Pamba Jiji have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Azam 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pamba Jiji vs Azam?

The statistical background for Pamba Jiji vs Azam — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.