Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 29 September 2026

Pamba Jiji vs Dodoma Jiji: match statistics

Pamba Jiji crest
Pamba Jiji
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Dodoma Jiji crest
Dodoma Jiji

Pamba Jiji vs Dodoma Jiji: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pamba Jiji played Dodoma Jiji in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Pamba Jiji: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Dodoma Jiji: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pamba Jiji scores 1.05 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. Dodoma Jiji scores 0.90 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.04 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pamba Jiji 38%, Dodoma Jiji 29%. Over 2.5: Pamba Jiji 48%, Dodoma Jiji 38%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 37%.

xG, shots and style

Pamba Jiji has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.14. Pamba Jiji: 5.5 shots per match, Dodoma Jiji: 5.5.

Match halves

Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.38. Dodoma Jiji: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Pamba Jiji: 0-15 (6 goals). Dodoma Jiji: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.04 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 37%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pamba Jiji holds a clear home advantage: they have won 50% of league home matches, score on average 1.4 goals and concede 0.8 goals per home game, with a home goal difference of +6. Dodoma Jiji shows weaker away metrics — only 20% wins on the road, on average 0.7 goals scored and 1.3 conceded per away match, resulting in a negative away goal difference of -6. Despite similar xG (Pamba 1.35 xG at home vs 1.28 xG for the visitors away), the hosts are significantly more clinical in finishing (shot conversion 20% vs 7%) and have a lower share of matches without scoring (20% vs 40%), which increases their chances. Over the last 5 matches however Dodoma have been in better form: the visitors have 2 wins and 5 goals, while Pamba have only 1 win and 3 goals, and in that period Pamba conceded 8 goals versus 6 for Dodoma; average points over the last 5 matches are 0.8 for Pamba vs 1.4 for Dodoma. Considering the home-stat advantage and superior efficiency of the hosts, I assess the probabilities as 55% for a Pamba Jiji win, 25% for a draw and 20% for a Dodoma Jiji win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I assign a 30% probability to BTTS (BTTS - Yes) and 70% to No BTTS; recommendation: 'No Goal'. Pamba Jiji at home averages 1.09 goals scored and concedes 0.73, with a season home clean sheet rate of 64%, which strongly reduces the likelihood of both teams on the scoresheet. Dodoma away averages 0.7 goals with xG_for 1.28, but a low conversion rate of 7% and an actual goals figure of 0.7 indicate they create chances but rarely convert them. Seasonal BTTS rates are 18% for Pamba versus 40% for Dodoma, while the league BTTS percentage is only 34% and 83% of league matches feature a clean sheet, further favoring a No Goal outcome. Although Pamba conceded an average of 1.6 goals in the last 5 matches (8 conceded) and their recent home BTTS rate has risen to 40%, the season-long 64% clean sheet rate and Pamba’s higher conversion (14% vs 7%) provide a stronger signal for selecting 'No Goal'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I forecast Over 1.5 as the strongest signal: the expected total is ~2.38 goals (1.26 for Pamba Jiji and 1.12 for Dodoma Jiji), calculated from home xG (1.06) and xG against for away (1.46) and away xG (1.28) and xG against for home (0.95). Pamba averages 1.09 goals per game and has 64% home clean sheets, while Dodoma averages 0.7 goals but generates more chances (8.0 shots vs 6.3) and more on-target shots (2.71 vs 2.3). Seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 64% for Pamba and 50% for Dodoma, so I estimate Over 1.5 probability at 78%. Over 2.5 shares are lower (45% for the home side, 30% for the away), and I set Over 2.5 at 42% versus 58% for Under 2.5; Over 3.5 is unlikely (Pamba 0%, Dodoma 30% → Over 3.5 ~12%). Additionally, Pamba’s low BTTS rate (18%) and high clean sheet share (64%) suggest a moderate, tight match with 2–3 goals is more likely than a very high-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Pamba Jiji has a clear home advantage: they led at the break in 50% of matches (leadingAtHT_home=50.0) and won 45% of home games (winPercentage_home=45.0), whereas Dodoma led at half-time in only 11% of matches and win 20% of away games (leadingAtHTPercentage_away=11.0, winPercentage_away=20.0). In the first half Pamba averages 0.6 goals scored and concedes 0.2 (scoredAVGHT_home=0.6, concededAVGHT_home=0.2), while Dodoma records 0.33 first-half goals and concedes 0.44 (scoredAVGHT_away=0.33, concededAVGHT_away=0.44), which supports the home side leading at the break. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet in 64% of matches (seasonCSPercentage_home=64.0) and have a 90% rate of clean sheets at half-time (seasonCSPercentageHT_home=90.0), and their shot conversion rate is 14% versus 7% for the visitors (shot_conversion_rate_home=14.0, shot_conversion_rate_away=7.0), so holding the lead and winning the match are most likely. The only warning signal is the visitors’ higher xG (xG 1.28 vs 1.06 for the home side — xg_for_avg_away=1.28, xg_for_avg_home=1.06) and Dodoma’s better form over the last 5 matches (last5_winPercentage_overall_away=40.0 vs home 20.0), hence I also assign a moderate share to scenarios with a draw at half-time. Considering the above figures, my primary pick is Pamba leading at half-time and the hosts winning the match (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
4Shots4
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
1Shots on target1
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
1xG0.88
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
7Corners5
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
91Dangerous attacks76
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
14Fouls11
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
0Cards0
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
1.05Goals scored / match0.9
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
1.05Goals conceded / match1
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
40%Average possession40%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
2.29Shots on target / match1.81
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.52Shots per match5.48
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
2.29Shots on target1.81
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
19%Shot conversion16.5%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
40%Possession40%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
1.28xG for1.14
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
1.28xG against1.14
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

Shooting quality

Pamba Jiji: Counter-attackingDodoma Jiji: Counter-attacking
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
Accuracy (shots on target)41%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.230.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dodoma Jiji is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 1.4 pts / match - Dodoma Jiji

Pamba Jiji
DLLWL
Season result split
33% W38% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Dodoma Jiji
LWLDW
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-7
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pamba Jiji is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 0.9 goals / match - Dodoma Jiji

Dodoma Jiji is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.05 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 1 goals / match - Dodoma Jiji

Pamba Jiji scoring profile: mixed

Pamba Jiji scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Dodoma Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 matches).

Dodoma Jiji scoring profile: mixed

Dodoma Jiji scores in 57% of matches (12 of 21 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).

22Goals scored (season)19
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
22Goals conceded (season)21
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
2.1Average goals in match1.9
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal57%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
29%2 goals24%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
14%3 goals10%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
0%4 goals0%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal52%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
24%2 goals29%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
19%3 goals19%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
0%4 goals0%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time10%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
14%Scored in both halves19%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
40%BTTS - last 520%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time48%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dodoma Jiji is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 1.48 pts / match - Dodoma Jiji

Pamba Jiji - half-time state
19% leading62% draw19% trailing
Dodoma Jiji - half-time state
29% leading62% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per match (1st half)1.48
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
0.86Average goals (1st half)0.71
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
62%Clean sheet before half-time81%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
67%No goal before half-time62%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.19
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
0.95Average goals (2nd half)1
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
62%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji
71%No goal after half-time62%
Pamba JijiDodoma Jiji

Pamba Jiji - second-half results

19% W43% D38% L
25
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dodoma Jiji - second-half results

19% W62% D19% L
31
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pamba Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Dodoma Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pamba Jiji
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Dodoma Jiji
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
1
2
16-30
6
1
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pamba Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Dodoma Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Pamba JijiLigaDodoma Jiji
Average goals in match• 2.102.04▼ 1.90
Both teams scored▲ 38%33%▼ 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 48%37%• 38%
Clean sheets▼ 38%41%▲ 48%
Goal before half-time▼ 52%55%▼ 48%
Goal after half-time▼ 57%61%▼ 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.04
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
0.80
Away goals / match
+56%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pamba Jiji 1 - 0 - 0 Dodoma Jiji. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Dodoma Jiji
0 : 3
Pamba Jiji

FAQ

What was the result of Pamba Jiji vs Dodoma Jiji?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Pamba Jiji 0:0 Dodoma Jiji. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pamba Jiji vs Dodoma Jiji?

Pamba Jiji score 1.05 goals per game on average and Dodoma Jiji 0.90. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Pamba Jiji's matches and 29% of Dodoma Jiji's.

What form are Pamba Jiji and Dodoma Jiji in?

Over the last 5 games Pamba Jiji have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Dodoma Jiji 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pamba Jiji vs Dodoma Jiji?

The statistical background for Pamba Jiji vs Dodoma Jiji — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.