Pamba Jiji vs JKT Tanzania: match statistics
Pamba Jiji vs JKT Tanzania: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pamba Jiji play JKT Tanzania in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 27 June 2026 at 15:00. Venue: CCM Kirumba Stadium. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Pamba Jiji: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. JKT Tanzania: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pamba Jiji scores 1.07 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. JKT Tanzania scores 1.00 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pamba Jiji 40%, JKT Tanzania 43%. Over 2.5: Pamba Jiji 50%, JKT Tanzania 40%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Pamba Jiji has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.18. Pamba Jiji: 5.3 shots per match, JKT Tanzania: 6.5.
Match halves
Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.47. JKT Tanzania: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Pamba Jiji: 0-15 (7 goals). JKT Tanzania: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
I predict a home win (1). Pamba Jiji averages 1.43 goals scored and 0.93 conceded per home match, while JKT Tanzania on the road averages 1.00 scored and 1.29 conceded. The hosts also generate more quality chances: 2.82 shots on target per match and a 17% shot-to-goal conversion versus 2.64 and 13% for JKT, and xG 1.32 versus 1.09 confirms Pamba’s situational advantage. Recent form over the last 5 matches also favors Pamba — 8 goals and an average of 1.2 points per game, whereas JKT have 5 goals, 0 wins in that period and only 0.6 points per game. At the same time, JKT’s high share of draws away (50% draws) makes a draw a realistic scenario, but the statistical advantages in attack and defense favor the hosts.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pamba Jiji | JKT Tanzania | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.24 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.49 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JKT Tanzania is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 0.8 pts / match - JKT Tanzania
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pamba Jiji is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.07 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 1 goals / match - JKT Tanzania
JKT Tanzania is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 1.1 goals / match - JKT Tanzania
Pamba Jiji scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
JKT Tanzania scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Pamba Jiji
Over / Under — JKT Tanzania
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pamba Jiji is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 0.97 pts / match - JKT Tanzania
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pamba Jiji - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
JKT Tanzania - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pamba Jiji
JKT Tanzania
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Pamba Jiji | Liga | JKT Tanzania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.23 | 2.17 | • 2.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 40% | 35% | ▲ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 39% | • 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 37% | 39% | ▼ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 60% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▲ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Pamba Jiji 0 - 0 - 1 JKT Tanzania. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Pamba Jiji vs JKT Tanzania?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Pamba Jiji 1:2 JKT Tanzania. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pamba Jiji vs JKT Tanzania?
Pamba Jiji score 1.07 goals per game on average and JKT Tanzania 1.00. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Pamba Jiji's matches and 43% of JKT Tanzania's.
What form are Pamba Jiji and JKT Tanzania in?
Over the last 5 games Pamba Jiji have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and JKT Tanzania 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pamba Jiji vs JKT Tanzania?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pamba Jiji vs JKT Tanzania: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.