Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraCCM Kirumba StadiumData current as of 01 September 2026

Pamba Jiji vs Simba: match statistics

Pamba Jiji crest
Pamba Jiji
1 : 2half-time 0:2
Simba crest
Simba

Pamba Jiji vs Simba: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pamba Jiji played Simba in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 19 August 2026. Venue: CCM Kirumba Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Pamba Jiji: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match. Simba: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pamba Jiji scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Simba scores 2.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 1.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pamba Jiji 100%, Simba 0%. Over 2.5: Pamba Jiji 0%, Simba 0%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 18%.

xG, shots and style

Pamba Jiji has higher xG: 1.12 vs 0.00. Pamba Jiji: 7.0 shots per match, Simba: -1.0.

Match halves

Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Simba: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Pamba Jiji: 16-30 (1 goals). Simba: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.91 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 18%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Simba have shown significantly more consistent recent form: they are unbeaten in their last five matches, winning 3 and drawing 2, with a 5:1 goal difference. Over the same period, Pamba Jiji suffered 3 defeats and scored 7 goals, but also conceded 7, highlighting clear problems with defensive control. In their only home match to date, the hosts drew, scoring and conceding 1 goal, while recording an average xG of 1.12 against 0.92 xG allowed. Simba’s away data is still too limited to carry significant weight, but conceding just 1 goal in their last five matches gives the visitors a notable edge in their out-of-possession organisation. A draw remains a realistic outcome due to the home advantage and the limited seasonal sample size, but the current trend points towards a Simba victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Simba have conceded just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while also showing high result stability with 3 wins and 2 draws. BTTS occurred in only 20% of Simba’s last five matches, whereas Pamba Jiji saw this scenario in 60% of their games. Pamba Jiji have recently averaged 1.4 goals scored, but their xG is only 0.65, meaning their goal tally looks significantly better than the quality of chances created. Simba generate a higher xG of 1.23 and average 1.0 goal scored, which supports a result in which the visitors score while the hosts fail to break through a very solid defence. Additionally, BTTS occurs in only 33% of matches across the league, while clean sheets account for as much as 67%; therefore, it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The data from the last 5 matches points to Simba’s very solid defense, which has conceded only 1 goal, averaging 0.2 per game. Pamba Jiji has averaged 1.4 goals, but its average xG is just 0.65, suggesting limited potential to consistently create dangerous chances against such a defense. Simba averages 1.0 goal with an xG of 1.23, while Pamba Jiji allows opponents an xG of 0.63, so the visitors should not significantly increase the total. The league averages only 2.0 goals per match, and just 33% of games exceed the 2.5-goal line. The strongest selection is Under 3.5, as at least 4 goals would be required for this bet to lose despite the low league average and Simba’s excellent recent defensive record.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Simba have been clearly more stable over their last five matches: they have averaged 2.2 points per game, won 60% of their matches and remained unbeaten, while Pamba Jiji have lost 60% of their games and averaged only 0.8 points. At half-time, the visitors were level in 60% of their recent appearances, never trailed and conceded an average of 0.0 goals, strongly supporting a draw after 45 minutes. Pamba Jiji went into the break behind in 40% of their matches, with their defence conceding an average of 0.8 goals before half-time, although Simba’s attack scored only 0.4 goals per game during this phase. After the interval, Simba average 0.6 goals scored and just 0.2 conceded, while keeping a clean sheet in 80% of second halves. The most likely HT/FT outcome is therefore a draw at half-time followed by a narrow win for the more consistent visitors.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
Pamba JijiSimba
1Shots2
Pamba JijiSimba
1Shots on target2
Pamba JijiSimba
0.51xG0.75
Pamba JijiSimba
0Corners5
Pamba JijiSimba
51Dangerous attacks66
Pamba JijiSimba
24Fouls10
Pamba JijiSimba
0Cards0
Pamba JijiSimba

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match2
Pamba JijiSimba
1Goals conceded / match0
Pamba JijiSimba
52%Average possession50%
Pamba JijiSimba
3Shots on target / match-1
Pamba JijiSimba

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match-1
Pamba JijiSimba
3Shots on target-1
Pamba JijiSimba
14.3%Shot conversion-200%
Pamba JijiSimba
52%Possession50%
Pamba JijiSimba
1.12xG for0
Pamba JijiSimba
0.92xG against0
Pamba JijiSimba

Shooting quality

Pamba Jiji: Efficient finishingSimba: Balanced
Pamba JijiSimba
Accuracy (shots on target)43%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Simba is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 3 pts / match - Simba

Pamba Jiji
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%
Simba
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Simba is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 2 goals / match - Simba

Pamba Jiji scoring profile: mixed

Pamba Jiji scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).

Simba scoring profile: very strong

Simba scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

1Goals scored (season)2
Pamba JijiSimba
1Goals conceded (season)0
Pamba JijiSimba
2Average goals in match2
Pamba JijiSimba
1Goals scored (last 5)2
Pamba JijiSimba
1Goals conceded (last 5)0
Pamba JijiSimba

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%2 goals100%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%3 goals0%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%4 goals0%
Pamba JijiSimba

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal0%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%2 goals0%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%3 goals0%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%4 goals0%
Pamba JijiSimba

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

100%BTTS at half-time0%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%Scored in both halves100%
Pamba JijiSimba

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Pamba JijiSimba
100%BTTS - last 50%
Pamba JijiSimba

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Pamba JijiSimba
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Pamba JijiSimba

2nd half

0%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Pamba JijiSimba

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Simba is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 3 pts / match - Simba

Pamba Jiji - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Simba - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)3
Pamba JijiSimba
1Goals scored (1st half)1
Pamba JijiSimba
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
Pamba JijiSimba
2Average goals (1st half)1
Pamba JijiSimba
0%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Pamba JijiSimba
0%No goal before half-time0%
Pamba JijiSimba

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)3
Pamba JijiSimba
0Goals scored (2nd half)1
Pamba JijiSimba
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Pamba JijiSimba
0Average goals (2nd half)1
Pamba JijiSimba
100%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Pamba JijiSimba
100%No goal after half-time0%
Pamba JijiSimba

Pamba Jiji - second-half results

0% W100% R0% P
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Simba - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pamba Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match2.00.0
1 goal100%0%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 1
Simba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.003.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pamba Jiji
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Simba
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pamba Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Simba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+2.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
220%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Pamba JijiLigaSimba
Average goals in match 2.001.91 2.00
Both teams scored 100%36% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%18% 0%
Clean sheets 0%32% 100%
Goal before half-time 100%73% 100%
Goal after half-time 0%64% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.91
Average goals per match
36%
Both teams scored
18%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.00
Home goals / match
0.91
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
9%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Anicet Alain Oura⚽ 1
Cletous Chama⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SimbaGoalCletous Chama

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Pamba Jiji 0 - 1 - 1 Simba. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Pamba Jiji vs Simba?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Pamba Jiji 1:2 Simba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pamba Jiji and Simba?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pamba Jiji won 0, Simba won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pamba Jiji vs Simba?

Pamba Jiji score 1.00 goals per game on average and Simba 2.00. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 18% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Pamba Jiji's matches and 0% of Simba's.

What form are Pamba Jiji and Simba in?

Over the last 5 games Pamba Jiji have a 0-1-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Simba 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pamba Jiji vs Simba?

The statistical background for Pamba Jiji vs Simba — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.