Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons: match statistics
Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pamba Jiji played Tanzania Prisons in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 26 May 2026. Venue: CCM Kirumba Stadium. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Pamba Jiji: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tanzania Prisons: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pamba Jiji scores 0.96 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Tanzania Prisons scores 0.50 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.11 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pamba Jiji 33%, Tanzania Prisons 25%. Over 2.5: Pamba Jiji 42%, Tanzania Prisons 33%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Pamba Jiji has higher xG: 1.32 vs 0.94. Pamba Jiji: 5.8 shots per match, Tanzania Prisons: 3.8.
Match halves
Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.38. Tanzania Prisons: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.21.
Goals by minute
Pamba Jiji: 0-15 (6 goals). Tanzania Prisons: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.11 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pamba Jiji are the favorites: they sit 7th and have scored 23 goals this season versus Tanzania Prisons’ 12, and at home the hosts average 1.27 goals scored and 0.73 conceded per match. In their last 5 games Pamba Jiji scored 4 goals and averaged 1.4 points per match, while Tanzania Prisons managed only 2 goals, 0.6 points per match and conceded as many as 11 goals in their last five fixtures. The hosts’ defense is superior: Pamba have 55% of home matches with a clean sheet, whereas the visitors have only 9% clean sheets on the road and fail to score in 73% of their away matches. Finishing efficiency also favors the hosts — Pamba’s shot conversion is 19% with an average of 2.67 shots on target per match, versus 5% conversion and 2.63 shots on target for the visitors; average xG is 1.31 for Pamba and 1.20 for Tanzania Prisons. Considering the efficiency advantage (19% vs 5%), the difference in average goals conceded (0.73 vs 1.55) and the high away loss rate for the visitors (82%), I tip the hosts to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "No" scenario is more likely: hosts have BTTS in 31% of matches, visitors only 18%, while the league BTTS average is 35%. Seasonal goals per team are 0.62 for Pamba Jiji and 0.36 for Tanzania Prisons (total 0.98), substantially below the league average of 2.1, indicating a low-scoring affair and reduced probability that both teams score. Hosts have kept a clean sheet in 46% of fixtures, and the league is characterized by 80% of matches featuring a clean sheet; additionally, in their last 5 matches the visitors have scored a total of 2 goals (0.4 avg) and conceded 11 (2.2 avg), so they seldom respond with goals. Theoretical xG shows similar values (hosts xG 0.78 vs visitors defense 1.59 → approx.1.19; visitors xG 1.2 vs hosts defense 1.12 → approx.1.16), but the visitors’ low shot conversion of 5% versus 21% for the hosts means few chances turn into goals, hence the pick: "No" (BTTS - No / No Goal).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I calculated expected goals as 1.19 for Pamba Jiji = (0.78 + 1.59)/2 and 1.16 for Tanzania Prisons = (1.20 + 1.12)/2, totaling 2.35 expected goals. This contrasts with seasonal scoring averages 0.62 (home) and 0.36 (away), but is supported by the hosts’ last 5 matches with xG 1.55 and the visitors’ weaker defense (avg 1.52 xG conceded in their last 5), suggesting a higher combined outcome. A Poisson model with lambda = 2.35 yields roughly a 68% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 42% for minimum 3 goals (Over 2.5) and about 21% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal rates show moderate occurrence of Over 1.5 (46% for hosts, 55% for guests) and less frequent Over 2.5 (38% and 27%), so Over 1.5 is most consistent with all data. Recommendation: play Over 1.5 — this is the strongest signal based on the expected 2.35 goals and a 68% probability of at least 2 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time: averaging 54% (home) and 60% (away) yields about a 57% chance of a draw at the break. From half-time draws, the home side is most likely to win the match — therefore X/1 received the highest probability at 34%: the home team has a shot conversion rate of 21% versus 5% for the visitors and averages 0.38 goals by half-time compared to 0.2 for the opponents, indicating greater efficiency in scoring opportunities. After the break the home team also performs better in points terms — on average 0.77 points after half-time versus 0.6 for the guests — and they keep more clean sheets over the season (46% vs 9%), which favors an improved result in the second half. The away team, however, has poor away form (only 9% away wins and 80% losses in the last five matches), and their xG of 1.2 compared to the home side’s 0.78 does not translate into goals due to low conversion, so scenarios in which they lead at the break and maintain the win are assessed as unlikely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pamba Jiji | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pamba Jiji is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 0.6 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pamba Jiji is 92% better for: goals scored per match.
0.96 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 0.5 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons
Pamba Jiji is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 1.38 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons
Pamba Jiji scores in 58% of matches (14 of 24 matches), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).
Tanzania Prisons scores in 38% of matches (9 of 24 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pamba Jiji
Over / Under - Tanzania Prisons
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pamba Jiji is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 0.83 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pamba Jiji - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tanzania Prisons - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pamba Jiji
Tanzania Prisons
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Pamba Jiji | Liga | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.96 | 2.11 | ▼ 1.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 35% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 42% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 40% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 46% | 57% | • 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 58% | 62% | ▼ 54% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Pamba Jiji 0 - 1 - 0 Tanzania Prisons. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Pamba Jiji 2:3 Tanzania Prisons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons?
Pamba Jiji score 0.96 goals per game on average and Tanzania Prisons 0.50. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Pamba Jiji's matches and 25% of Tanzania Prisons's.
What form are Pamba Jiji and Tanzania Prisons in?
Over the last 5 games Pamba Jiji have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tanzania Prisons 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


