Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius: match statistics
Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Panevėžys played TransINVEST Vilnius in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 12 June 2026. Venue: Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Panevėžys: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. TransINVEST Vilnius: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Panevėžys scores 0.93 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.81 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Panevėžys 53%, TransINVEST Vilnius 56%. Over 2.5: Panevėžys 53%, TransINVEST Vilnius 69%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
TransINVEST Vilnius has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.15. Panevėžys: 9.8 shots per match, TransINVEST Vilnius: 12.9.
Match halves
Panevėžys: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33. TransINVEST Vilnius: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.94.
Goals by minute
Panevėžys: 31-45+ (4 goals). TransINVEST Vilnius: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (TransINVEST Vilnius) because they have scored 29 goals this season versus the hosts' 14 and sit 3rd in the table compared to Panevėžys in 7th. TransINVEST average 2.25 goals per away match with an average xG of 1.41 and a shot conversion rate of 19%, while Panevėžys score 1.00 goals at home with xG 1.26 and a 9% conversion. Form supports the visitors’ edge — in the last 5 matches TransINVEST have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, averaging 2.0 points per game, whereas the hosts have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses and 1.4 points per game. Panevėžys do, however, possess a solid home defence — only 0.71 goals conceded per match on average and 29% clean sheets, which reduces the likelihood of a big away victory and increases the probability of a draw. Considering the goals advantage 29:14, superior conversion 19% vs 9% and higher recent points per match (2.0 vs 1.4), I rate TransINVEST as more likely to win with a moderate chance of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes with a 65% probability vs 35% No. TransINVEST averages 2.25 goals per match, has 63% BTTS rate this season (60% in last 5) and an attacking xG of 1.41, exceeding the hosts' defensive xG of 1.17 — a strong indicator for the visitors to score. Panevėžys concedes only 0.75 goals seasonally and has 50% clean sheets, but in the last 5 matches they conceded 1.6 goals on average and had only 40% BTTS, so recent defensive form is weaker than the seasonal picture. Additionally TransINVEST registers more shots on target 5.13 vs 3.88 and has a higher conversion rate 19% vs 10%, and the high percentage of away matches with over 2.5 goals (88%) plus 63% of games combining Over 2.5 and BTTS confirm a tendency toward both-teams-to-score affairs. Overall TransINVEST’s offensive metrics (2.25 avg and 63% BTTS) outweigh Panevėžys (1.38 scored and 50% clean sheets), therefore the ‘Yes’ bet appears the stronger and more likely choice.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
After weighing xG and seasonal averages I estimate 1.42 goals for Panevėžys and 1.40 for TransINVEST, totaling approximately 2.82 goals. Offensive xG are 1.57 for the home side and 1.41 for the visitors, while xG against is 1.17 for the home team and 1.21 for the visitors, yielding xG-based expectations of about 1.39 and 1.29 before season-adjustments. Seasonal figures confirm TransINVEST’s attacking pressure — the visitors average 2.25 goals per game and have 88% of matches over 2.5 goals, and both teams recorded 60% of matches over 2.5 in their last 5 outings. A Poisson model at a total of 2.82 estimates roughly 77% for Over 1.5, about 54% for Over 2.5 and around 31% for Over 3.5, indicating a clear edge to Over markets, especially the 1.5 line. Therefore I recommend the Over 1.5 bet (line 1.5, side: over) as the strongest signal from the available data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back HT/FT 2/2 — TransINVEST leading at the break and the visitors winning after 90 minutes. In their last 5 matches the visitors led at the break in 60% of games and scored on average 1.2 first-half goals versus Panevėžys’s 0.6 (60% and 1.2 vs 0.6), which is a clear signal favoring the away side in the first half. Although seasonally the home team concedes only 0.25 goals before the break, their recent five fixtures show greater vulnerability — they conceded on average 1.0 first-half goal in the last 5 matches, undermining the home defensive season form (0.25 vs 1.0). Seasonal metrics support the visitors’ attacking edge: TransINVEST averages 2.25 goals per match, registers 5.13 shots on target and converts at 19%, while Panevėžys records 1.38 goals, 3.88 shots on target and a 10% conversion rate (2.25 vs 1.38; 5.13 vs 3.88; 19% vs 10%). Additionally, the visitors have won 60% of their last 5 matches compared to 40% for the hosts, and 63% of the visitors’ season matches feature goals at both ends; therefore the strongest scenario from the data is 2/2 — the visitors leading at the break and winning the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Panevėžys | TransINVEST Vilnius | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Panevėžys · 1.6 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 95% better for: goals scored per match.
0.93 goals / match - Panevėžys · 1.81 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius
TransINVEST Vilnius is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Panevėžys · 1.13 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius
Panevėžys scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).
TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Panevėžys
Over / Under - TransINVEST Vilnius
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - Panevėžys · 1.81 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Panevėžys - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Panevėžys
TransINVEST Vilnius
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Panevėžys | Liga | TransINVEST Vilnius | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.60 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 47% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 53% | 52% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 32% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 70% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Panevėžys 1 - 0 - 0 TransINVEST Vilnius. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius?
The A Lyga match finished Panevėžys 1:2 TransINVEST Vilnius. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius?
Panevėžys score 0.93 goals per game on average and TransINVEST Vilnius 1.81. The A Lyga average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Panevėžys's matches and 56% of TransINVEST Vilnius's.
What form are Panevėžys and TransINVEST Vilnius in?
Over the last 5 games Panevėžys have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and TransINVEST Vilnius 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius?
The statistical background for Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


