Lithuania - A LygaPanevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionasData current as of 23 July 2026

Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius: match statistics

Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Panevėžys play TransINVEST Vilnius in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match date is 12 June 2026 at 17:30. Venue: Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Panevėžys: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. TransINVEST Vilnius: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Panevėžys scores 0.95 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.68 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Panevėžys 57%, TransINVEST Vilnius 64%. Over 2.5: Panevėžys 62%, TransINVEST Vilnius 73%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

TransINVEST Vilnius has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.26. Panevėžys: 11.0 shots per match, TransINVEST Vilnius: 12.6.

Match halves

Panevėžys: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.38. TransINVEST Vilnius: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

Panevėžys: 31-45+ (7 goals). TransINVEST Vilnius: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back the away win (TransINVEST Vilnius) because they have scored 29 goals this season versus the hosts' 14 and sit 3rd in the table compared to Panevėžys in 7th. TransINVEST average 2.25 goals per away match with an average xG of 1.41 and a shot conversion rate of 19%, while Panevėžys score 1.00 goals at home with xG 1.26 and a 9% conversion. Form supports the visitors’ edge — in the last 5 matches TransINVEST have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, averaging 2.0 points per game, whereas the hosts have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses and 1.4 points per game. Panevėžys do, however, possess a solid home defence — only 0.71 goals conceded per match on average and 29% clean sheets, which reduces the likelihood of a big away victory and increases the probability of a draw. Considering the goals advantage 29:14, superior conversion 19% vs 9% and higher recent points per match (2.0 vs 1.4), I rate TransINVEST as more likely to win with a moderate chance of a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
13Shots22
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
4Shots on target6
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.41xG2.19
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
3Corners11
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
41Dangerous attacks53
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
8Fouls9
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1Cards3
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0.95Goals scored / match1.68
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.81Goals conceded / match1.27
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
47%Average possession49%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
3.76Shots on target / match4.23
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match12.59
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
3.76Shots on target4.23
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
8.7%Shot conversion13.4%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
47%Possession49%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.26xG for1.47
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.64xG against1.24
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Shooting quality

Panevėžys: BalancedTransINVEST Vilnius: Efficient finishing
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Panevėžys
LWLDL
Season result split
29% W19% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-11
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
TransINVEST Vilnius
LWDLL
Season result split
45% W23% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-7
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 77% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Panevėžys · 1.68 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius

TransINVEST Vilnius is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.81 goals / match - Panevėžys · 1.27 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius

Panevėžys scoring profile: strong

Panevėžys scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

TransINVEST Vilnius scoring profile: very strong

TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

20Goals scored (season)37
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
38Goals conceded (season)28
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
2.76Average goals in match2.95
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
5Goals scored (last 5)6
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
11Goals conceded (last 5)9
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal86%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
24%2 goals50%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
5%3 goals18%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0%4 goals9%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal68%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
48%2 goals41%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
33%3 goals18%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
14%4 goals0%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
TransINVEST Vilnius - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 22 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time27%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
10%BTTS in both halves5%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
10%Scored in both halves36%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS59%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
60%BTTS - last 580%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Panevėžys · 1.73 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius

Panevėžys - half-time state
33% leading24% draw43% trailing
TransINVEST Vilnius - half-time state
45% leading36% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.73
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.86
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.52Average goals (1st half)1.36
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
38%Clean sheet before half-time59%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
57%No goal before half-time32%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.14
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.59
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
43%Clean sheet after half-time45%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
67%No goal after half-time45%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Panevėžys - second-half results

19% W38% R43% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results

27% W32% R41% P
38
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
TransINVEST Vilnius - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
0
5
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

TransINVEST Vilnius
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
6
31-45
6
4
46-60
8
5
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

TransINVEST Vilnius

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

PanevėžysLigaTransINVEST Vilnius
Average goals in match 2.762.62 2.95
Both teams scored 57%49% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%55% 73%
Clean sheets 14%32% 32%
Goal before half-time 81%69% 82%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Panevėžys 1 - 0 - 0 TransINVEST Vilnius. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius?

The A Lyga match finished Panevėžys 1:2 TransINVEST Vilnius. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius?

Panevėžys score 0.95 goals per game on average and TransINVEST Vilnius 1.68. The A Lyga average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Panevėžys's matches and 64% of TransINVEST Vilnius's.

What form are Panevėžys and TransINVEST Vilnius in?

Over the last 5 games Panevėžys have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and TransINVEST Vilnius 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius?

The statistical background for Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.