Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen: match statistics
Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Patro Eisden played AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 18 December 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Patro Eisden: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. AS Eupen: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Patro Eisden scores 1.25 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. AS Eupen scores 1.44 and concedes 1.06. League average: 2.70 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Patro Eisden 44%, AS Eupen 56%. Over 2.5: Patro Eisden 44%, AS Eupen 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.10. Patro Eisden: 16.1 shots per match, AS Eupen: 9.1.
Match halves
Patro Eisden: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75. AS Eupen: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (7 goals). AS Eupen: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Patro Eisden | AS Eupen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Patro Eisden is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.4 pts / match - AS Eupen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AS Eupen is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.44 goals / match - AS Eupen
Patro Eisden is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.94 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.06 goals / match - AS Eupen
Patro Eisden scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).
AS Eupen scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Patro Eisden
Over / Under - AS Eupen
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AS Eupen is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.38 pts / match - AS Eupen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Patro Eisden - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
AS Eupen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Patro Eisden
AS Eupen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Patro Eisden | Liga | AS Eupen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.19 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 53% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 50% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 27% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Patro Eisden 0 - 1 - 0 AS Eupen. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?
The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 0:1 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?
Patro Eisden score 1.25 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.44. The First Division B average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Patro Eisden's matches and 56% of AS Eupen's.
What form are Patro Eisden and AS Eupen in?
Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and AS Eupen 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.