Patro Eisden vs KAA Gent II: match statistics
Patro Eisden vs KAA Gent II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Patro Eisden played KAA Gent II in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 29 November 2025. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Patro Eisden: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. KAA Gent II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Patro Eisden scores 1.23 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. KAA Gent II scores 1.31 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Patro Eisden 46%, KAA Gent II 31%. Over 2.5: Patro Eisden 46%, KAA Gent II 38%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.51. Patro Eisden: 15.8 shots per match, KAA Gent II: 12.0.
Match halves
Patro Eisden: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.62. KAA Gent II: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.54.
Goals by minute
Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (4 goals). KAA Gent II: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Patro Eisden | KAA Gent II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KAA Gent II is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.4 pts / match - KAA Gent II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KAA Gent II is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.23 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.31 goals / match - KAA Gent II
Patro Eisden scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
KAA Gent II scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Patro Eisden
Over / Under - KAA Gent II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KAA Gent II is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.77 pts / match - KAA Gent II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Patro Eisden - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
KAA Gent II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Patro Eisden
KAA Gent II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Patro Eisden | Liga | KAA Gent II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.31 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 53% | ▼ 31% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 49% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 27% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 74% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 81% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Patro Eisden vs KAA Gent II?
The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 2:1 KAA Gent II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs KAA Gent II?
Patro Eisden score 1.23 goals per game on average and KAA Gent II 1.31. The First Division B average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Patro Eisden's matches and 31% of KAA Gent II's.
What form are Patro Eisden and KAA Gent II in?
Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and KAA Gent II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs KAA Gent II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Patro Eisden vs KAA Gent II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.