Belgium - First Division BData current as of 06 September 2026

Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II: match statistics

Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden
4 : 4half-time 2:1
KRC Genk II crest
KRC Genk II
165%(1.38)
X22%(4.35)
213%(6.00)

Patro Eisden demonstrates definitely better form and statistics as the host. The team has won 64% of home matches, scoring an average of 1.18 goals while conceding just 0.82, resulting in a positive goal difference (+4). Additionally, their impressive form in the last 5 matches (2.2 points per match, 3 wins, 2 draws) and advantage in xG (1.65 to 1.01) indicate a solid disposition. KRC Genk II struggles on the road—with just 20% wins, 50% losses, and a negative goal difference (-9). The visitors have lost 4 of their last 5 fixtures, conceding an average of 1.9 goals per away game. Qualitative advantage, form, and the home pitch factor clearly favor Patro Eisden to secure a victory in this clash.

Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Patro Eisden played KRC Genk II in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 6 February 2026. Final score: 4:4.

Current form

Patro Eisden: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. KRC Genk II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Patro Eisden scores 1.27 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. KRC Genk II scores 1.14 and concedes 1.95. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Patro Eisden 45%, KRC Genk II 62%. Over 2.5: Patro Eisden 36%, KRC Genk II 62%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.24. Patro Eisden: 15.7 shots per match, KRC Genk II: 11.2.

Match halves

Patro Eisden: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.73. KRC Genk II: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (9 goals). KRC Genk II: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Patro Eisden demonstrates definitely better form and statistics as the host. The team has won 64% of home matches, scoring an average of 1.18 goals while conceding just 0.82, resulting in a positive goal difference (+4). Additionally, their impressive form in the last 5 matches (2.2 points per match, 3 wins, 2 draws) and advantage in xG (1.65 to 1.01) indicate a solid disposition. KRC Genk II struggles on the road—with just 20% wins, 50% losses, and a negative goal difference (-9). The visitors have lost 4 of their last 5 fixtures, conceding an average of 1.9 goals per away game. Qualitative advantage, form, and the home pitch factor clearly favor Patro Eisden to secure a victory in this clash.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
2 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
16Shots18
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
7Shots on target6
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
1.74xG1.99
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
2Corners4
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
34Dangerous attacks59
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
13Fouls9
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
0Cards1
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
1.27Goals scored / match1.14
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
0.91Goals conceded / match1.95
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
37%Average possession47%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
5.23Shots on target / match3.67
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.68Shots per match11.24
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
5.23Shots on target3.67
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
8.1%Shot conversion10.2%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
37%Possession47%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
1.71xG for1.24
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
1.06xG against1.78
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

Shooting quality

Patro Eisden: AttackingKRC Genk II: Balanced
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Patro Eisden is 267% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 0.6 pts / match - KRC Genk II

Patro Eisden
DWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W27% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-5
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
KRC Genk II
LLLLW
Season result split
24% W19% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-12
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Patro Eisden is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.14 goals / match - KRC Genk II

Patro Eisden is 114% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.95 goals / match - KRC Genk II

Patro Eisden scoring profile: very strong

Patro Eisden scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

KRC Genk II scoring profile: strong

KRC Genk II scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).

28Goals scored (season)24
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
20Goals conceded (season)41
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
2.18Average goals in match3.1
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
8Goals scored (last 5)4
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
4Goals conceded (last 5)10
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal67%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
41%2 goals33%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
9%3 goals14%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
9%4 goals0%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal86%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
27%2 goals62%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
0%3 goals24%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
0%4 goals19%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time29%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
18%Scored in both halves19%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
60%BTTS - last 540%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Patro Eisden is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.1 pts / match - KRC Genk II

Patro Eisden - half-time state
32% leading45% draw23% trailing
KRC Genk II - half-time state
24% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.1
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.86
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
0.91Average goals (1st half)1.48
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
64%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
64%No goal before half-time57%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per match (2nd half)0.76
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)1.1
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.62
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
50%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II
50%No goal after half-time57%
Patro EisdenKRC Genk II

Patro Eisden - second-half results

36% W36% R27% P
31
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KRC Genk II - second-half results

14% W33% R52% P
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
KRC Genk II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
1
31-45
4
6
46-60
3
2
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

KRC Genk II
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
9
31-45
2
6
46-60
6
7
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+89%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

KRC Genk II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Patro EisdenLigaKRC Genk II
Average goals in match 2.182.73 3.10
Both teams scored 45%53% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%51% 62%
Clean sheets 36%27% 14%
Goal before half-time 59%71% 76%
Goal after half-time 77%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Patro EisdenGoalLéandro Rousseau
  2. Patro EisdenGoalRaymond Asante
  3. KRC Genk IIGoalVictory BeniangbaAssist: Ayumu Yokoyama
  4. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Ali CamaraOff: Djoully Nzoko
  5. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Alois PeninOff: Denys Prychynenko
  6. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Amir RaisOff: Raymond Asante
  7. Patro EisdenGoalJordan Renson
  8. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Jonathan CoenenOff: Myung-Jun Kim
  9. KRC Genk IIYellow cardKayden Pierre
  10. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Nicolas OryeOff: Kéres Masangu
  11. Patro EisdenGoalJaphet Emmanuel Muanza
  12. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Jelle DriessenOff: Manu Mocsnik
  13. KRC Genk IIGoalJonathan Coenen
  14. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Aaron MurenziOff: Kayden Pierre
  15. Patro EisdenGoalJulien Devriendt

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Patro Eisden 1 - 0 - 0 KRC Genk II. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Jong KRC Genk
1 : 4
Patro Eisden Maasmechelen

FAQ

What was the result of Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II?

The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 4:4 KRC Genk II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II?

Patro Eisden score 1.27 goals per game on average and KRC Genk II 1.14. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Patro Eisden's matches and 62% of KRC Genk II's.

What form are Patro Eisden and KRC Genk II in?

Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and KRC Genk II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II?

The statistical background for Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.