Belgium - First Division BPatro StadionData current as of 31 October 2026

Patro Eisden vs Lokeren-Temse: match statistics

Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Lokeren-Temse crest
Lokeren-Temse

Patro Eisden vs Lokeren-Temse: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Patro Eisden played Lokeren-Temse in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Venue: Patro Stadion. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Patro Eisden: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Lokeren-Temse: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Patro Eisden scores 1.38 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse scores 2.14 and concedes 1.57. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Patro Eisden 75%, Lokeren-Temse 57%. Over 2.5: Patro Eisden 75%, Lokeren-Temse 57%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Lokeren-Temse has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.33. Patro Eisden: 13.3 shots per match, Lokeren-Temse: 14.9.

Match halves

Patro Eisden: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75. Lokeren-Temse: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (4 goals). Lokeren-Temse: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lokeren-Temse sit 4th, while Patro Eisden are 9th; in their last five matches, the visitors have collected 10 points and the hosts 9. The biggest difference lies in finishing: away from home, Lokeren-Temse average 2.67 goals from 6.33 shots on target, while Patro score 1.25 goals from 3.25 shots on target at home. The visitors also create slightly better chances, recording an away xG of 1.63 compared with the hosts’ home xG of 1.32, and have scored 14 goals in their last five matches, against Patro’s 6. The hosts’ defence keeps them in contention: they concede an average of 1.25 goals at home, while Lokeren-Temse concede 1.67 away. Despite this, the visitors’ edge in shots on target and goals scored points to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Patro Eisden average 1.75 goals at home and have failed to score in none of the matches considered, increasing the likelihood of the home side finding the net. Lokeren-Temse average 2.67 goals away, while Patro concede 1.50 at home, making an away goal likely as well. The xG figures for both attacks also support BTTS - Yes: 1.82 for the hosts and 1.63 for the visitors. However, the signal is not conclusive: BTTS occurred in 75% of Patro's home matches but in only 33% of Lokeren-Temse's away matches, while the figure was 40% for both teams across their last five games. Therefore, the likelihood of both teams scoring is only moderately higher.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

All previous meetings between the two teams have produced at least two goals, giving Over 1.5 a stronger signal than the higher lines. Patro Eisden score an average of 1.75 goals and concede 1.5, while Lokeren-Temse average 2.67 scored and 1.67 conceded, pointing to goal-scoring potential at both ends. This is supported by attacking xG averages of 1.82 for the hosts and 1.63 for the visitors, although Patro have scored just 1.2 goals per game across their last five matches. Over 2.5 goals has landed in 50% of the hosts' matches and 67% of the visitors' games, making it less reliable than Over 1.5. A forecast of 3.22 goals supports the Over 1.5 pick, while the limited number of previous meetings warrants caution.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by a Lokeren-Temse win at full-time appears to be the most likely outcome. Patro Eisden kept a clean sheet in the first half in 4 of their last 5 matches, so despite the visitors leading at the break in 3 of their last 5, an early lead is far from certain. The difference in form after the break is clear: Lokeren-Temse have recently averaged 1.8 goals in second halves, compared with just 0.2 for Patro Eisden. The visitors have won the second half in 3 of their last 5 matches, while the hosts have not won one at all. The visitors’ advantage in the final result is also supported by an average of 2.8 goals scored across their last 5 matches, compared with 1.2 for the hosts.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
9Shots11
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
5Shots on target5
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
1.24xG1.51
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
5Corners7
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
44Dangerous attacks64
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
12Fouls18
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
2Cards3
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
1.38Goals scored / match2.14
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
1.75Goals conceded / match1.57
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
41%Average possession59%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
3.38Shots on target / match5.57
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.25Shots per match14.86
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
3.38Shots on target5.57
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
10.4%Shot conversion14.4%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
41%Possession59%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
1.33xG for1.74
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
1.42xG against1.39
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

Shooting quality

Patro Eisden: BalancedLokeren-Temse: Dominant
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
Accuracy (shots on target)26%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lokeren-Temse is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.4 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse

Patro Eisden
LLLWW
Season result split
38% W0% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-5
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 at home
2-0-2
WLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Lokeren-Temse
LLWDW
Season result split
57% W14% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-2
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lokeren-Temse is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 2.14 goals / match - Lokeren-Temse

Lokeren-Temse is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.75 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.57 goals / match - Lokeren-Temse

Patro Eisden scoring profile: very strong

Patro Eisden scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Lokeren-Temse keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

Lokeren-Temse scoring profile: very strong

Lokeren-Temse scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).

11Goals scored (season)15
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
14Goals conceded (season)11
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
3.13Average goals in match3.71
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
7Goals scored (last 5)11
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
9Goals conceded (last 5)10
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal86%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
38%2 goals71%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
13%3 goals14%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
0%4 goals14%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal71%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
63%2 goals43%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
13%3 goals29%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
13%4 goals14%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time29%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
13%BTTS in both halves29%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
13%Scored in both halves57%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
60%BTTS - last 560%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lokeren-Temse is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.86 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse

Patro Eisden - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing
Lokeren-Temse - half-time state
57% leading14% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.86
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
0.63Goals scored (1st half)1
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.57
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
50%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
63%No goal before half-time29%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

After half-time (2nd half)

0.75Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
2Average goals (2nd half)2.14
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
25%Clean sheet after half-time29%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse
38%No goal after half-time29%
Patro EisdenLokeren-Temse

Patro Eisden - second-half results

13% W38% D50% L
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lokeren-Temse - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
13
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Lokeren-Temse - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Lokeren-Temse
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Lokeren-Temse

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
165%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Patro EisdenLigaLokeren-Temse
Average goals in match• 3.133.09▲ 3.71
Both teams scored▲ 75%52%▲ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%61%▼ 57%
Clean sheets▼ 13%26%▲ 29%
Goal before half-time▼ 75%77%▲ 86%
Goal after half-time▲ 88%86%• 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Patro EisdenYellow cardSami Lahssaini
  2. Patro EisdenYellow cardLars Dietz
  3. Lokeren-TemseYellow cardMaxime Pau
  4. Patro EisdenGoalRadja Nainggolan
  5. Lokeren-TemseGoalVancy Roméo Mabanza
  6. Lokeren-TemseYellow cardModeste Duku Mbenga
  7. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Jimmy Adrian KaparosOff: Seokju Hong
  8. Lokeren-TemseYellow cardVancy Roméo Mabanza
  9. Patro EisdenGoalLouis Verstraete
  10. Lokeren-TemseSubstitutionOn: Anisse BrrouOff: Salim Ben Seghir
  11. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Tsubasa KasayanagiOff: Radja Nainggolan
  12. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Jeremy Loteteka BokilaOff: Isaias Del Pupo
  13. Patro EisdenGoalJimmy Adrian Kaparos

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Patro Eisden 1 - 1 - 0 Lokeren-Temse. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KSC Lokeren-Temse
1 : 1
Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
2 : 1
KSC Lokeren-Temse

FAQ

What was the result of Patro Eisden vs Lokeren-Temse?

The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 3:1 Lokeren-Temse. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Patro Eisden and Lokeren-Temse?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Patro Eisden won 1, Lokeren-Temse won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs Lokeren-Temse?

Patro Eisden score 1.38 goals per game on average and Lokeren-Temse 2.14. The First Division B average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Patro Eisden's matches and 57% of Lokeren-Temse's.

What form are Patro Eisden and Lokeren-Temse in?

Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Lokeren-Temse 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs Lokeren-Temse?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.