Patro Eisden vs RWDM: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Patro Eisden played RWDM in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 23 November 2025. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Patro Eisden: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. RWDM: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Patro Eisden scores 1.25 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. RWDM scores 1.92 and concedes 1.58. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Patro Eisden 50%, RWDM 58%. Over 2.5: Patro Eisden 50%, RWDM 58%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.51. Patro Eisden: 15.7 shots per match, RWDM: 12.7.

Match halves

Patro Eisden: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.58. RWDM: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Patro Eisden: 16-30 (3 goals). RWDM: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
Patro EisdenRWDM
18Shots7
Patro EisdenRWDM
4Shots on target2
Patro EisdenRWDM
1.7xG0.85
Patro EisdenRWDM
2Corners3
Patro EisdenRWDM
40Dangerous attacks34
Patro EisdenRWDM
23Fouls12
Patro EisdenRWDM
5Cards1
Patro EisdenRWDM

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.25Goals scored / match1.92
Patro EisdenRWDM
1.17Goals conceded / match1.58
Patro EisdenRWDM
37%Average possession51%
Patro EisdenRWDM
4.83Shots on target / match5
Patro EisdenRWDM

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.67Shots per match12.67
Patro EisdenRWDM
4.83Shots on target5
Patro EisdenRWDM
8%Shot conversion15.1%
Patro EisdenRWDM
37%Possession51%
Patro EisdenRWDM
1.66xG for1.51
Patro EisdenRWDM
1.02xG against1.52
Patro EisdenRWDM

Shooting quality

Patro Eisden: AttackingRWDM: Efficient finishing
Patro EisdenRWDM
Accuracy (shots on target)31%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Patro Eisden
WDLDL
Season result split
42% W25% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-4
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
RWDM
DWLDL
Season result split
33% W25% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-5
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 54% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.92 goals / match - RWDM

Patro Eisden is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.58 goals / match - RWDM

Patro Eisden scoring profile: strong

Patro Eisden scores in 58% of matches (7 of 12 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).

RWDM scoring profile: very strong

RWDM scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).

15Goals scored (season)23
Patro EisdenRWDM
14Goals conceded (season)19
Patro EisdenRWDM
2.42Average goals in match3.5
Patro EisdenRWDM
5Goals scored (last 5)9
Patro EisdenRWDM
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
Patro EisdenRWDM

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal75%
Patro EisdenRWDM
50%2 goals58%
Patro EisdenRWDM
8%3 goals42%
Patro EisdenRWDM
8%4 goals8%
Patro EisdenRWDM

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal83%
Patro EisdenRWDM
42%2 goals50%
Patro EisdenRWDM
0%3 goals17%
Patro EisdenRWDM
0%4 goals8%
Patro EisdenRWDM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time8%
Patro EisdenRWDM
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Patro EisdenRWDM
25%Scored in both halves42%
Patro EisdenRWDM

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Patro EisdenRWDM
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Patro EisdenRWDM
60%BTTS - last 580%
Patro EisdenRWDM

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Patro EisdenRWDM
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Patro EisdenRWDM
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Patro EisdenRWDM

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Patro EisdenRWDM
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Patro EisdenRWDM
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Patro EisdenRWDM

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RWDM is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.75 pts / match - RWDM

Patro Eisden - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
RWDM - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.75
Patro EisdenRWDM
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.92
Patro EisdenRWDM
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Patro EisdenRWDM
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.5
Patro EisdenRWDM
50%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Patro EisdenRWDM
58%No goal before half-time42%
Patro EisdenRWDM

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.25
Patro EisdenRWDM
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)1
Patro EisdenRWDM
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Patro EisdenRWDM
1.25Average goals (2nd half)2
Patro EisdenRWDM
42%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Patro EisdenRWDM
58%No goal after half-time42%
Patro EisdenRWDM

Patro Eisden - second-half results

17% W50% R33% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RWDM - second-half results

33% W25% R42% P
21
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
5
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
3
5
16-30
4
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Patro EisdenLigaRWDM
Average goals in match 2.422.72 3.50
Both teams scored 50%52% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%49% 58%
Clean sheets 25%28% 17%
Goal before half-time 75%73% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%80% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-5%
Home defence advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Patro EisdenYellow cardMilan Robberechts
  2. Patro EisdenYellow cardJordan Renson
  3. Patro EisdenYellow cardKéres Masangu
  4. RWDMYellow cardPjotr Kestens
  5. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Ridwane M'BarkiOff: Amir Rais
  6. RWDMSubstitutionOn: Francisco MontoroOff: Pjotr Kestens
  7. Patro EisdenGoalLéandro RousseauAssist: Stef Peeters
  8. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Denys PrychynenkoOff: Léandro Rousseau
  9. Patro EisdenYellow cardDenys Prychynenko
  10. Patro EisdenYellow cardJulien Devriendt

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Patro Eisden vs RWDM?

The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 1:0 RWDM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs RWDM?

Patro Eisden score 1.25 goals per game on average and RWDM 1.92. The First Division B average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Patro Eisden's matches and 58% of RWDM's.

What form are Patro Eisden and RWDM in?

Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and RWDM 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs RWDM?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Patro Eisden vs RWDM: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.