France - Ligue 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38: match statistics

Pau crest
Pau
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Grenoble Foot 38 crest
Grenoble Foot 38
150%(1.97)
X28%(3.40)
222%(3.70)

Pau appears as the slight favorite in this meeting, even though their recent form raises some doubts. The hosts have a clear advantage in xG statistics at their own stadium (1.52 vs 1.01), indicating better quality in creating chances. Grenoble Foot 38 has not kept a clean sheet in any away match this season and concedes an average of 1.67 goals on the road, which, combined with a 67% away loss rate, makes them the weaker side as visitors. Pau can exploit their possession advantage (52% vs 45%) and better xG efficiency, although their recent run (1 win in the last 5 matches) needs improvement. Considering all factors, especially Grenoble's poor away disposition, the hosts have a real chance of securing three points, although a draw remains in play due to the unstable form of both teams.

Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pau play Grenoble Foot 38 in Ligue 2 (France). The match date is 23 January 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Pau: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Grenoble Foot 38: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pau scores 1.41 and concedes 1.82 goals per match. Grenoble Foot 38 scores 0.97 and concedes 1.15. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pau 56%, Grenoble Foot 38 56%. Over 2.5: Pau 68%, Grenoble Foot 38 38%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Pau has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.19. Pau: 12.2 shots per match, Grenoble Foot 38: 10.0.

Match halves

Pau: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.59. Grenoble Foot 38: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Pau: 16-30 (10 goals). Grenoble Foot 38: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Pau appears as the slight favorite in this meeting, even though their recent form raises some doubts. The hosts have a clear advantage in xG statistics at their own stadium (1.52 vs 1.01), indicating better quality in creating chances. Grenoble Foot 38 has not kept a clean sheet in any away match this season and concedes an average of 1.67 goals on the road, which, combined with a 67% away loss rate, makes them the weaker side as visitors. Pau can exploit their possession advantage (52% vs 45%) and better xG efficiency, although their recent run (1 win in the last 5 matches) needs improvement. Considering all factors, especially Grenoble's poor away disposition, the hosts have a real chance of securing three points, although a draw remains in play due to the unstable form of both teams.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
PauGrenoble Foot 38
19Shots12
PauGrenoble Foot 38
5Shots on target5
PauGrenoble Foot 38
2xG1.36
PauGrenoble Foot 38
9Corners5
PauGrenoble Foot 38
62Dangerous attacks34
PauGrenoble Foot 38
13Fouls11
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1Cards2
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.41Goals scored / match0.97
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.82Goals conceded / match1.15
PauGrenoble Foot 38
52%Average possession44%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
3.88Shots on target / match3.59
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.15Shots per match10.03
PauGrenoble Foot 38
3.88Shots on target3.59
PauGrenoble Foot 38
11.6%Shot conversion9.7%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
52%Possession44%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.35xG for1.19
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.25xG against1.57
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Shooting quality

Pau: BalancedGrenoble Foot 38: Balanced
PauGrenoble Foot 38
Accuracy (shots on target)32%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grenoble Foot 38 is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Pau · 1.6 pts / match - Grenoble Foot 38

Pau
WWLLL
Season result split
35% W26% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-7
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Grenoble Foot 38
DLDWW
Season result split
24% W44% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-15-11
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.85Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pau is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

1.41 goals / match - Pau · 0.97 goals / match - Grenoble Foot 38

Grenoble Foot 38 is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.82 goals / match - Pau · 1.15 goals / match - Grenoble Foot 38

Pau scoring profile: very strong

Pau scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Grenoble Foot 38 keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

Grenoble Foot 38 scoring profile: strong

Grenoble Foot 38 scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while Pau keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

48Goals scored (season)33
PauGrenoble Foot 38
62Goals conceded (season)39
PauGrenoble Foot 38
3.24Average goals in match2.12
PauGrenoble Foot 38
8Goals scored (last 5)5
PauGrenoble Foot 38
14Goals conceded (last 5)4
PauGrenoble Foot 38

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal68%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
41%2 goals21%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
18%3 goals6%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
0%4 goals3%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
53%2 goals32%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
32%3 goals12%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
15%4 goals0%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
Grenoble Foot 38 - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 34 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time12%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
9%BTTS in both halves3%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
24%Scored in both halves12%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
80%BTTS - last 560%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
32%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pau - half-time state
35% leading26% draw38% trailing
Grenoble Foot 38 - half-time state
26% leading53% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.32
PauGrenoble Foot 38
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.44
PauGrenoble Foot 38
0.97Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.79Average goals (1st half)0.76
PauGrenoble Foot 38
47%Clean sheet before half-time68%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
44%No goal before half-time68%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.06
PauGrenoble Foot 38
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
PauGrenoble Foot 38
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
PauGrenoble Foot 38
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.35
PauGrenoble Foot 38
47%Clean sheet after half-time44%
PauGrenoble Foot 38
50%No goal after half-time53%
PauGrenoble Foot 38

Pau - second-half results

24% W35% R41% P
45
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grenoble Foot 38 - second-half results

21% W44% R35% P
45
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pau - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Grenoble Foot 38 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pau
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
10
12
16-30
10
11
31-45
7
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
10
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Grenoble Foot 38
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
1
14
61-75
14
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pau

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Grenoble Foot 38

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

PauLigaGrenoble Foot 38
Average goals in match 3.242.53 2.12
Both teams scored 56%52% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%47% 38%
Clean sheets 29%30% 29%
Goal before half-time 85%67% 53%
Goal after half-time 76%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pau 0 - 1 - 0 Grenoble Foot 38. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Grenoble Foot 38
1 : 1
Pau FC

FAQ

What was the result of Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38?

The Ligue 2 match finished Pau 2:2 Grenoble Foot 38. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38?

Pau score 1.41 goals per game on average and Grenoble Foot 38 0.97. The Ligue 2 average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Pau's matches and 56% of Grenoble Foot 38's.

What form are Pau and Grenoble Foot 38 in?

Over the last 5 games Pau have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Grenoble Foot 38 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pau vs Grenoble Foot 38?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.