Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueShahid Dastgerdi StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Paykan vs Sanat Naft: match statistics

Paykan crest
Paykan
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Sanat Naft crest
Sanat Naft

Paykan vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paykan played Sanat Naft in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Paykan: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Sanat Naft: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paykan scores 0.60 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Sanat Naft scores 0.20 and concedes 0.80. League average: 1.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paykan 20%, Sanat Naft 20%. Over 2.5: Paykan 20%, Sanat Naft 20%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 20%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Paykan: -1.0 shots per match, Sanat Naft: -1.0.

Match halves

Paykan: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.40. Sanat Naft: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Paykan: 31-45+ (1 goals). Sanat Naft: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.74 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 20%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams have shown almost identical form in their last five matches: Paykan and Sanat Naft have each recorded 1 win, 3 draws and 1 defeat, averaging 1.2 points per game. The hosts sit higher in the table, in 9th place compared with their opponents’ 14th position, and have scored 3 goals this season, while Sanat Naft have managed just 1. At the same time, both sides have conceded 4 goals, indicating a similar level of defensive organisation. The home and away records are exceptionally draw-heavy: each team has ended both of its available matches in that role in a goalless draw, scoring and conceding no goals. A low-scoring draw therefore appears the most likely outcome, although Paykan’s marginally greater attacking potential gives the hosts a slightly higher chance of winning than the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as Sanat Naft averages no goals scored away from home and failed to score in 100% of such matches. In their last five games, both teams have recorded BTTS in only 20% of cases, while each averages just 0.6 goals scored and 0.8 goals conceded. Paykan also have limited attacking output, averaging 0.5 goals at home, making a one-sided scoreline or a goalless draw the most likely outcomes. Additionally, the league BTTS average is only 31%, while the average total goals is 1.82, supporting a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have averaged just 0.6 goals scored and 0.8 conceded over their last 5 matches, resulting in only 1.4 total goals per game. Each team’s matches have gone Over 2.5 goals in just 20% of their last five appearances, with an equally low 20% of games featuring both teams scoring. Sanat Naft have failed to score in their away data and have kept clean sheets in 100% of those matches, further limiting the prospects of an open game. The league as a whole is clearly low-scoring, averaging 1.82 goals, with only 23% of matches finishing Over 2.5. Therefore, Under 3.5 goals has very strong statistical support.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw both at half-time and at full-time, as both teams drew 60% of their last five matches and averaged 1.2 points per game over that sample. Paykan were level at the break in 80% of those matches, while Sanat Naft were level at half-time in 60%; at the same time, the hosts scored just 0.2 goals per game before the break, compared with 0.4 for the visitors. The teams’ recent matches produced an average of only 1.4 goals, with each side averaging 0.6 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, limiting the likelihood of a decisive outcome. After the break, both teams drew in 80% of their last five appearances, while Sanat Naft kept a clean sheet in 100% of those matches. In addition, the league is highly defensive, averaging 1.82 goals per match, and both teams scored in only 31% of games, so a draw following a cautious first half has the strongest basis.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Shots-1
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Shots on target-1
PaykanSanat Naft
0xG0
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Corners-1
PaykanSanat Naft
0Dangerous attacks0
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Fouls-1
PaykanSanat Naft
1Cards0
PaykanSanat Naft

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.6Goals scored / match0.2
PaykanSanat Naft
1Goals conceded / match0.8
PaykanSanat Naft
-1%Average possession-1%
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Shots on target / match-1
PaykanSanat Naft

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Shots on target-1
PaykanSanat Naft
-60%Shot conversion-20%
PaykanSanat Naft
-1%Possession-1%
PaykanSanat Naft
0xG for0
PaykanSanat Naft
0xG against0
PaykanSanat Naft

Shooting quality

Paykan: BalancedSanat Naft: Balanced
PaykanSanat Naft
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Paykan is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Paykan · 0.8 pts / match - Sanat Naft

Paykan
LDWDL
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 at home
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Sanat Naft
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W80% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paykan is 200% better for: goals scored per match.

0.6 goals / match - Paykan · 0.2 goals / match - Sanat Naft

Sanat Naft is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Paykan · 0.8 goals / match - Sanat Naft

Paykan scoring profile: more difficult

Paykan scores in 20% of matches (1 of 5 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

Sanat Naft scoring profile: more difficult

Sanat Naft scores in 20% of matches (1 of 5 matches), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

3Goals scored (season)1
PaykanSanat Naft
5Goals conceded (season)4
PaykanSanat Naft
1.6Average goals in match1
PaykanSanat Naft
3Goals scored (last 5)1
PaykanSanat Naft
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
PaykanSanat Naft

How often they score at least...

20%1 goal20%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%2 goals0%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%3 goals0%
PaykanSanat Naft
0%4 goals0%
PaykanSanat Naft

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal40%
PaykanSanat Naft
40%2 goals20%
PaykanSanat Naft
0%3 goals20%
PaykanSanat Naft
0%4 goals0%
PaykanSanat Naft

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%BTTS in both halves0%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%Scored in both halves0%
PaykanSanat Naft

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
PaykanSanat Naft
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%BTTS - last 520%
PaykanSanat Naft

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
PaykanSanat Naft
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
PaykanSanat Naft
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
PaykanSanat Naft

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time0%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PaykanSanat Naft

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paykan - half-time state
0% leading80% draw20% trailing
Sanat Naft - half-time state
0% leading80% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)0.8
PaykanSanat Naft
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.2
PaykanSanat Naft
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
PaykanSanat Naft
0.8Average goals (1st half)1
PaykanSanat Naft
60%Clean sheet before half-time60%
PaykanSanat Naft
80%No goal before half-time80%
PaykanSanat Naft

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1
PaykanSanat Naft
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0
PaykanSanat Naft
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0
PaykanSanat Naft
0.8Average goals (2nd half)0
PaykanSanat Naft
60%Clean sheet after half-time100%
PaykanSanat Naft
80%No goal after half-time100%
PaykanSanat Naft

Paykan - second-half results

20% W60% R20% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sanat Naft - second-half results

0% W100% R0% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.8

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Paykan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Sanat Naft - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.0
Average goals in match1.00.0
1 goal40%0%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paykan
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
3
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
3
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
75%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
20%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
4%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
64%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paykan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.80
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
24%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 100% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

PaykanLigaSanat Naft
Average goals in match 1.601.74 1.00
Both teams scored 20%30% 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%20% 20%
Clean sheets 40%46% 60%
Goal before half-time 40%52% 40%
Goal after half-time 40%61% 0%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.74
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
52%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PaykanYellow cardSaeb Mohebi
  2. PaykanSubstitutionOn: Hasan ShoushtariOff: Mehdi Najafi
  3. Sanat NaftSubstitutionOn: Alireza RezaeiOff: Khashayar Zebarjad

FAQ

What was the result of Paykan vs Sanat Naft?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Paykan 2:0 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paykan vs Sanat Naft?

Paykan score 0.60 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 0.20. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 20% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Paykan's matches and 20% of Sanat Naft's.

What form are Paykan and Sanat Naft in?

Over the last 5 games Paykan have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Sanat Naft 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paykan vs Sanat Naft?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.