Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

Paykan vs Sepahan: match statistics

Paykan crest
Paykan
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Sepahan crest
Sepahan
125%(4.61)
X30%(3.25)
245%(1.71)

As the league leader, Sepahan presents significantly higher form and efficiency than Paykan, who sits in 12th place. The visitors have an impressive 60% away win rate with a +7 goal difference, while the hosts have won only 27% of their home matches with a -1 balance. Sepahan is characterized by much better offensive efficiency (1.2 goals per away match compared to Paykan's 0.64 at home) and a solid defense (60% clean sheets away). The form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 0.8 PPG for the hosts). Paykan fails to score in 55% of home matches, which gives a distinct advantage to the table leader against such an effective rival. Considering all statistical indicators, Sepahan is the clear favorite for this match.

Paykan vs Sepahan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paykan played Sepahan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 27 February 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Paykan: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Sepahan: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paykan scores 0.68 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Sepahan scores 1.14 and concedes 0.62. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paykan 32%, Sepahan 38%. Over 2.5: Paykan 18%, Sepahan 29%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Sepahan has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.14. Paykan: 3.9 shots per match, Sepahan: 4.4.

Match halves

Paykan: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.23. Sepahan: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Paykan: 16-30 (4 goals). Sepahan: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

As the league leader, Sepahan presents significantly higher form and efficiency than Paykan, who sits in 12th place. The visitors have an impressive 60% away win rate with a +7 goal difference, while the hosts have won only 27% of their home matches with a -1 balance. Sepahan is characterized by much better offensive efficiency (1.2 goals per away match compared to Paykan's 0.64 at home) and a solid defense (60% clean sheets away). The form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 0.8 PPG for the hosts). Paykan fails to score in 55% of home matches, which gives a distinct advantage to the table leader against such an effective rival. Considering all statistical indicators, Sepahan is the clear favorite for this match.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
PaykanSepahan
-1Shots-1
PaykanSepahan
-1Shots on target-1
PaykanSepahan
0xG0
PaykanSepahan
-1Corners-1
PaykanSepahan
0Dangerous attacks0
PaykanSepahan
-1Fouls-1
PaykanSepahan
2Cards3
PaykanSepahan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.68Goals scored / match1.14
PaykanSepahan
0.95Goals conceded / match0.62
PaykanSepahan
25%Average possession27%
PaykanSepahan
0.86Shots on target / match1.43
PaykanSepahan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.86Shots per match4.43
PaykanSepahan
0.86Shots on target1.43
PaykanSepahan
17.6%Shot conversion25.8%
PaykanSepahan
25%Possession27%
PaykanSepahan
1.14xG for1.3
PaykanSepahan
0.96xG against0.75
PaykanSepahan

Shooting quality

Paykan: Counter-attackingSepahan: Counter-attacking
PaykanSepahan
Accuracy (shots on target)22%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.300.29
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.790.80

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sepahan is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Paykan · 1.4 pts / match - Sepahan

Paykan
LWLLD
Season result split
23% W36% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-9
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Sepahan
LDLWW
Season result split
52% W24% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-5
1.81 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sepahan is 68% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - Paykan · 1.14 goals / match - Sepahan

Sepahan is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - Paykan · 0.62 goals / match - Sepahan

Paykan scoring profile: mixed

Paykan scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Sepahan keeps a clean sheet in 52% (11 of 21 matches).

Sepahan scoring profile: very strong

Sepahan scores in 81% of matches (17 of 21 matches), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).

15Goals scored (season)24
PaykanSepahan
21Goals conceded (season)13
PaykanSepahan
1.64Average goals in match1.76
PaykanSepahan
2Goals scored (last 5)6
PaykanSepahan
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
PaykanSepahan

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal81%
PaykanSepahan
14%2 goals24%
PaykanSepahan
0%3 goals10%
PaykanSepahan
0%4 goals0%
PaykanSepahan

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal48%
PaykanSepahan
32%2 goals14%
PaykanSepahan
0%3 goals0%
PaykanSepahan
0%4 goals0%
PaykanSepahan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time10%
PaykanSepahan
5%BTTS in both halves0%
PaykanSepahan
5%Scored in both halves10%
PaykanSepahan

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
PaykanSepahan
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
PaykanSepahan
20%BTTS - last 560%
PaykanSepahan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
PaykanSepahan
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
PaykanSepahan
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PaykanSepahan

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
PaykanSepahan
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
PaykanSepahan
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
PaykanSepahan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sepahan is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - Paykan · 1.43 pts / match - Sepahan

Paykan - half-time state
27% leading55% draw18% trailing
Sepahan - half-time state
33% leading43% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.43
PaykanSepahan
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.48
PaykanSepahan
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
PaykanSepahan
0.82Average goals (1st half)0.81
PaykanSepahan
64%Clean sheet before half-time67%
PaykanSepahan
59%No goal before half-time57%
PaykanSepahan

After half-time (2nd half)

0.73Points per match (2nd half)1.62
PaykanSepahan
0.23Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
PaykanSepahan
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
PaykanSepahan
0.82Average goals (2nd half)0.95
PaykanSepahan
50%Clean sheet after half-time76%
PaykanSepahan
82%No goal after half-time52%
PaykanSepahan

Paykan - second-half results

9% W45% D45% L
30
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 23%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sepahan - second-half results

38% W48% D14% L
30
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Paykan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Sepahan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paykan
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Sepahan
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
0
16-30
5
4
31-45
3
1
46-60
5
2
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+76%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paykan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Sepahan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

PaykanLigaSepahan
Average goals in match 1.641.79 1.76
Both teams scored 32%39% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%28% 29%
Clean sheets 36%41% 52%
Goal before half-time 59%54% 67%
Goal after half-time 59%62% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.78
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SepahanYellow cardAref Haji Eydi
  2. PaykanYellow cardAmirali Madadizadeh
  3. SepahanYellow cardHadi Mohammadi
  4. PaykanYellow cardHojjat Ahmadi
  5. SepahanYellow cardMohammad Mehdi Mohebi
  6. SepahanSubstitutionOn: Mehdi LimouchiOff: Arash Rezavand
  7. PaykanSubstitutionOn: Amirhossein GholamiOff: Afshin Sadeghi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Paykan 0 - 0 - 1 Sepahan. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Sepahan
2 : 1
Paykan

FAQ

What was the result of Paykan vs Sepahan?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Paykan 0:0 Sepahan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paykan vs Sepahan?

Paykan score 0.68 goals per game on average and Sepahan 1.14. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Paykan's matches and 38% of Sepahan's.

What form are Paykan and Sepahan in?

Over the last 5 games Paykan have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sepahan 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paykan vs Sepahan?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.