Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueShahid Dastgerdi StadiumData current as of 21 October 2026

Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin: match statistics

Paykan crest
Paykan
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Shams Azar Qazvin crest
Shams Azar Qazvin

Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paykan played Shams Azar Qazvin in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Paykan: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Shams Azar Qazvin: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paykan scores 0.71 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.86 and concedes 1.29. League average: 1.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paykan 14%, Shams Azar Qazvin 43%. Over 2.5: Paykan 14%, Shams Azar Qazvin 29%. League level: BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 25%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Paykan: -1.0 shots per match, Shams Azar Qazvin: -1.0.

Match halves

Paykan: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.43. Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Paykan: 16-30 (1 goals). Shams Azar Qazvin: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.94 goals per match, BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 25%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Paykan sit 8th, while Shams Azar Qazvin are 16th, a difference reflected in their results: the hosts have won 2 of 7 matches, compared with just 1 for the visitors. In their last five matches, Paykan have collected 7 points and conceded 4 goals, while Shams Azar have taken 4 points and conceded 6. The strongest argument in the hosts’ favour is their home defence: they have kept clean sheets in all three such matches. However, their attack is a limitation—averaging 0.67 goals at home and failing to score in 67% of those games increases the likelihood of a draw. The visitors average 1 goal away from home, so despite Paykan’s advantage, a convincing win looks unlikely.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

It is more likely that at least one team will fail to score: BTTS - Yes landed in 50% of Paykan’s matches and 33% of Shams Azar Qazvin’s, while the league average is 31%. Paykan score only 0.75 goals per match on average and failed to score in 50% of their games, while the visitors concede an average of 0.67 goals. BTTS - Yes landed just once in Paykan’s last five matches and twice in Shams Azar Qazvin’s, even though both teams averaged 1 goal scored per game over that period. The visitors’ chance of scoring is increased by Paykan’s season average of 1.75 goals conceded, but that figure has fallen to 0.8 over their last five matches, further supporting the BTTS - No pick. BTTS - No means that at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily mean a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: all of Shams Azar Qazvin’s matches to date and 75% of Paykan’s fixtures have finished below this line. Paykan’s last five matches averaged 1.8 goals, while the visitors’ matches averaged 2.2; Over 2.5 goals landed in 20% and 40% of those games, respectively. The hosts score an average of 0.75 goals per game this season, while the visitors concede 0.67, limiting Paykan’s prospects of a high-scoring performance. Although Paykan concede an average of 1.75 goals, Shams Azar score 1.0 per match, and the league average is only 1.75 goals. With a projected total of 1.95 goals, the 3.5 line offers a clearer edge than lower lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome: Shams Azar went into the break level in 2 of 3 away matches, while Paykan did so in 2 of 4 home games. The visitors have yet to concede a first-half goal away from home, making it difficult to back the hosts to lead at the break, although Paykan were level at half-time in 4 of their last 5 matches. After the break, I give Shams Azar the edge: they average 1.00 goals and 1.33 points per away match, while Paykan score 0.75 goals and earn 0.25 points per home game, having lost 3 of 4. The visitors also average 0.67 second-half goals away from home, compared with Paykan's 0.25 at home. However, X/2 is not a clear favourite, as Paykan have averaged 1.4 points in their last 5 matches, while Shams Azar have managed only 0.8.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots-1
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target-1
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0xG0
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
-1Corners-1
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0Dangerous attacks0
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
-1Fouls-1
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
2Cards2
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0.71Goals scored / match0.86
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0.86Goals conceded / match1.29
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
-1%Average possession-1%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target / match-1
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target-1
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
-71.4%Shot conversion-85.7%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
-1%Possession-1%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0xG for0
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0xG against0
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

Shooting quality

Paykan: BalancedShams Azar Qazvin: Balanced
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Paykan is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Paykan · 0.8 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin

Paykan
WDLWL
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Shams Azar Qazvin
LWDLL
Season result split
14% W29% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-4
0.71 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shams Azar Qazvin is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

0.71 goals / match - Paykan · 0.86 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin

Paykan is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.86 goals / match - Paykan · 1.29 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin

Paykan scoring profile: mixed

Paykan scores in 29% of matches (2 of 7 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

Shams Azar Qazvin scoring profile: mixed

Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

5Goals scored (season)6
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
6Goals conceded (season)9
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
1.57Average goals in match2.14
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
5Goals scored (last 5)5
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

How often they score at least...

29%1 goal57%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
29%2 goals29%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
14%3 goals0%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0%4 goals0%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal71%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
29%2 goals43%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0%3 goals14%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0%4 goals0%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

37%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time29%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
14%BTTS in both halves0%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
29%Scored in both halves29%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
20%BTTS - last 540%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time14%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paykan is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - Paykan · 1 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin

Paykan - half-time state
14% leading71% draw14% trailing
Shams Azar Qazvin - half-time state
14% leading57% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.43
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.86
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0.71Average goals (1st half)1.29
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
71%Clean sheet before half-time57%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
71%No goal before half-time57%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.29
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
0.86Average goals (2nd half)0.86
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
57%Clean sheet after half-time57%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin
71%No goal after half-time57%
PaykanShams Azar Qazvin

Paykan - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Paykan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Shams Azar Qazvin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paykan
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Shams Azar Qazvin
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
17%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
31%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paykan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Shams Azar Qazvin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.86
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

PaykanLigaShams Azar Qazvin
Average goals in match▼ 1.571.94▲ 2.14
Both teams scored▼ 14%37%▲ 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 14%25%▲ 29%
Clean sheets▲ 43%40%▼ 29%
Goal before half-time▼ 43%55%▲ 57%
Goal after half-time▼ 57%70%• 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.94
Average goals per match
37%
Both teams scored
25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
0.81
Away goals / match
+40%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Shams Azar QazvinGoalMohammad Milad Sourgi
  2. PaykanSubstitutionOn: Hasan ShoushtariOff: Hojjat Ahmadi
  3. Shams Azar QazvinYellow cardMohammad Nejadmahdi
  4. Shams Azar QazvinSubstitutionOn: Ali HosseinzadehOff: Mohammadmehdi Mansouri
  5. Shams Azar QazvinYellow cardReza Mohammadi
  6. PaykanYellow cardMilad Bagheri
  7. Shams Azar QazvinSubstitutionOn: Amirali CheginiOff: Mohammad Milad Sourgi
  8. PaykanYellow cardFarid Amiri

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Paykan 0 - 1 - 1 Shams Azar Qazvin. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Paykan
0 : 1
Shams Azar Qazvin
Shams Azar Qazvin
1 : 1
Paykan

FAQ

What was the result of Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Paykan 1:1 Shams Azar Qazvin. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Paykan and Shams Azar Qazvin?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Paykan won 0, Shams Azar Qazvin won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

Paykan score 0.71 goals per game on average and Shams Azar Qazvin 0.86. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 14% of Paykan's matches and 43% of Shams Azar Qazvin's.

What form are Paykan and Shams Azar Qazvin in?

Over the last 5 games Paykan have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Shams Azar Qazvin 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

The statistical background for Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.