Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Stadion PelikanData current as of 22 October 2026

Pelikan Łowicz vs Swit: match statistics

Pelikan Łowicz crest
Pelikan Łowicz
4 : 1half-time 1:0
Swit crest
Swit

Pelikan Łowicz vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pelikan Łowicz played Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Pelikan. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Pelikan Łowicz: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Swit: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pelikan Łowicz scores 1.33 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Swit scores 1.50 and concedes 0.67. League average: 3.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pelikan Łowicz 67%, Swit 50%. Over 2.5: Pelikan Łowicz 67%, Swit 67%. League level: BTTS 70%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

Swit has higher xG: 2.21 vs 1.59. Pelikan Łowicz: 12.3 shots per match, Swit: 10.8.

Match halves

Pelikan Łowicz: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.00. Swit: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Pelikan Łowicz: 46-60 (4 goals). Swit: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.63 goals per match, BTTS 70%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pelikan Łowicz remain unbeaten at home, winning 67% of their home matches and averaging 2.00 goals per game, while Świt score just 0.67 times away from home. The hosts are also far more consistent in attack, having failed to score in none of their home fixtures, whereas the visitors have drawn a blank in 67% of away matches. Świt do create plenty of chances, however, recording an average xG of 2.45 and 6.5 shots on target per game, so their low goal tally is primarily down to poor finishing at a rate of 5%. The visitors’ defence looks solid, conceding just 0.33 goals away from home and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of such matches, which significantly increases the likelihood of a draw. Pelikan nevertheless hold a slight edge thanks to their more effective home attack and a run of two wins and one draw in their last three home matches.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal for BTTS - No comes from Świt’s defensive record: the visitors concede an average of just 0.33 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 67% of their games. Pelikan has indeed recorded both teams scoring in 67% of matches, but in their last five outings they scored only 1.0 goal per game, with 1.55 xG. On the other hand, Świt have averaged just 0.67 goals scored in the competition and failed to score in as many as 67% of matches, which clearly increases the likelihood of the hosts keeping a clean sheet. The visitors’ higher xG of 2.45 and 20.0 shots per match suggest attacking potential, but their conversion rate is only 5%, so this does not offset their scoring problems. BTTS - No is more likely because the most realistic scenario is that at least one team, particularly Świt, fails to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Świt have a solid away defensive record, conceding an average of just 0.33 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of such matches. Pelikan have averaged 2.33 goals at home, but their average has dropped to 1.0 over their last five matches, with 1.55 xG per game. The visitors create plenty of chances, as evidenced by 2.45 xG and 20.0 shots per away match, but their conversion rate is only 5%, so a high-scoring game is not guaranteed. Świt have seen fewer than 3.5 goals in all of their away matches so far, while the same has applied to 67% of Pelikan’s home games. Therefore, a maximum of three goals has the strongest statistical backing. The projected total of 2.50 goals points to value in the Under 3.5 goals market.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as Świt were level at the break in all three of their away matches so far, while a half-time draw occurred in 50% of their last five fixtures. Pelikan also tend to start cautiously: in three of their last five matches, they went into the break level, scoring just 0.2 goals per game in the first half. Świt have conceded an average of only 0.33 goals per away match, kept a clean sheet in 67% of their games, and as many as 67% of their matches ended in a draw. The hosts have a higher seasonal scoring record, averaging 2.33 goals per match compared with Świt’s 0.67, but current form is more balanced: Pelikan have recently averaged 1.0 goal per game, while Świt have averaged 1.4. Pelikan are usually more dangerous after the break, but Świt have not conceded a single second-half goal in their last five matches, strengthening the case for a draw to be maintained until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
17Shots20
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
5Shots on target8
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
1.9xG2.51
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
4Corners6
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
65Dangerous attacks95
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
15Fouls14
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
0Cards0
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
1.33Goals scored / match1.5
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
1.5Goals conceded / match0.67
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
51%Average possession37%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
4.5Shots on target / match4
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.33Shots per match10.83
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
4.5Shots on target4
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
10.8%Shot conversion13.8%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
51%Possession37%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
1.59xG for2.21
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
1.48xG against1
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

Shooting quality

Pelikan Łowicz: BalancedSwit: Counter-attacking
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Swit is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Pelikan Łowicz · 1.6 pts / match - Swit

Pelikan Łowicz
WWLDL
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Swit
WDLDW
Season result split
50% W33% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 away
1-2-0
WDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.14Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Swit is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Pelikan Łowicz · 1.5 goals / match - Swit

Swit is 124% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Pelikan Łowicz · 0.67 goals / match - Swit

Pelikan Łowicz scoring profile: strong

Pelikan Łowicz scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

Swit scoring profile: very strong

Swit scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Pelikan Łowicz keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

8Goals scored (season)9
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
9Goals conceded (season)4
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
2.83Average goals in match2.17
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal67%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
33%2 goals50%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
17%3 goals17%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
0%4 goals17%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal50%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
50%2 goals17%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
17%3 goals0%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
0%4 goals0%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

70%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time0%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
17%BTTS in both halves0%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
17%Scored in both halves17%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
60%BTTS - last 540%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pelikan Łowicz - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing
Swit - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.17
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
0.83Average goals (1st half)0.67
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
67%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
67%No goal before half-time83%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)2
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
2Average goals (2nd half)1
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
17%Clean sheet after half-time83%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit
33%No goal after half-time50%
Pelikan ŁowiczSwit

Pelikan Łowicz - second-half results

50% W17% D33% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Swit - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pelikan Łowicz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Swit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pelikan Łowicz
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Swit
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
69%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pelikan Łowicz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

Pelikan ŁowiczLigaSwit
Average goals in match▼ 2.833.63▼ 2.17
Both teams scored▼ 67%70%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 67%69%▼ 67%
Clean sheets• 17%18%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%67%▼ 33%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%78%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.63
Average goals per match
70%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / match
1.63
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
41%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Dawid Dzięgielewski⚽ 1
—Krzysztof Supera⚽ 2

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Pelikan ŁowiczGoalDawid Dzięgielewski
  2. Pelikan ŁowiczGoalKrzysztof Supera
  3. Pelikan ŁowiczGoalKrzysztof Supera

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Pelikan Łowicz vs Swit?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Pelikan Łowicz 4:1 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pelikan Łowicz vs Swit?

Pelikan Łowicz score 1.33 goals per game on average and Swit 1.50. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Pelikan Łowicz's matches and 50% of Swit's.

What form are Pelikan Łowicz and Swit in?

Over the last 5 games Pelikan Łowicz have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Swit 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pelikan Łowicz vs Swit?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pelikan Łowicz vs Swit: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.