Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 31 October 2026

Pendikspor vs Amed: match statistics

Pendikspor crest
Pendikspor
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Amed crest
Amed
140%(2.90)
X35%(3.20)
225%(2.30)

Pendikspor displays impressive home form with a 64% win rate at their stadium and a +17 goal difference, making them a formidable opponent on home soil. Amed, despite being the league leaders, has significantly weaker away statistics - with only a 36% win rate and a high 45% loss rate on the road, which is a clear weakness for the team. The recent form of both sides is mixed; however, Pendikspor scores an average of 2 goals per match at home while conceding only 0.45, whereas Amed concedes an average of 1.73 goals away. A key factor is that Amed fails to score in 36% of their away matches, which could be problematic against a Pendikspor defense that keeps clean sheets in 64% of their home games. Considering the hosts' strong home performances and the visitors' away struggles, I expect a closely contested match with a slight edge for Pendikspor, although a draw remains a realistic scenario.

Pendikspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pendikspor played Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 7 February 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Pendikspor: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Amed: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pendikspor scores 1.48 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Amed scores 2.22 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.88 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pendikspor 43%, Amed 57%. Over 2.5: Pendikspor 43%, Amed 70%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.43. Pendikspor: 12.9 shots per match, Amed: 15.5.

Match halves

Pendikspor: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.04. Amed: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.22.

Goals by minute

Pendikspor: 76-90+ (10 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pendikspor displays impressive home form with a 64% win rate at their stadium and a +17 goal difference, making them a formidable opponent on home soil. Amed, despite being the league leaders, has significantly weaker away statistics - with only a 36% win rate and a high 45% loss rate on the road, which is a clear weakness for the team. The recent form of both sides is mixed; however, Pendikspor scores an average of 2 goals per match at home while conceding only 0.45, whereas Amed concedes an average of 1.73 goals away. A key factor is that Amed fails to score in 36% of their away matches, which could be problematic against a Pendikspor defense that keeps clean sheets in 64% of their home games. Considering the hosts' strong home performances and the visitors' away struggles, I expect a closely contested match with a slight edge for Pendikspor, although a draw remains a realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
PendiksporAmed
11Shots18
PendiksporAmed
2Shots on target5
PendiksporAmed
1.23xG1.88
PendiksporAmed
2Corners5
PendiksporAmed
54Dangerous attacks55
PendiksporAmed
15Fouls13
PendiksporAmed
3Cards3
PendiksporAmed

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.48Goals scored / match2.22
PendiksporAmed
0.83Goals conceded / match1.22
PendiksporAmed
53%Average possession53%
PendiksporAmed
4.65Shots on target / match5.78
PendiksporAmed

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.91Shots per match15.48
PendiksporAmed
4.65Shots on target5.78
PendiksporAmed
11.4%Shot conversion14.3%
PendiksporAmed
53%Possession53%
PendiksporAmed
1.43xG for1.69
PendiksporAmed
1.1xG against1.13
PendiksporAmed

Shooting quality

Pendikspor: BalancedAmed: Attacking
PendiksporAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amed is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Pendikspor · 2 pts / match - Amed

Pendikspor
DDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
43% W39% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-4
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WDDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Amed
WWLDW
Season result split
61% W17% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-4-5
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 0.91BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.48 goals / match - Pendikspor · 2.22 goals / match - Amed

Pendikspor is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Pendikspor · 1.22 goals / match - Amed

Pendikspor scoring profile: strong

Pendikspor scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 matches).

Amed scoring profile: strong

Amed scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Pendikspor keeps a clean sheet in 52% (12 of 23 matches).

34Goals scored (season)51
PendiksporAmed
19Goals conceded (season)28
PendiksporAmed
2.3Average goals in match3.43
PendiksporAmed
2Goals scored (last 5)12
PendiksporAmed
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
PendiksporAmed

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal78%
PendiksporAmed
43%2 goals61%
PendiksporAmed
22%3 goals30%
PendiksporAmed
9%4 goals22%
PendiksporAmed

How often they concede at least...

48%1 goal70%
PendiksporAmed
22%2 goals35%
PendiksporAmed
9%3 goals13%
PendiksporAmed
4%4 goals4%
PendiksporAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time30%
PendiksporAmed
0%BTTS in both halves9%
PendiksporAmed
22%Scored in both halves39%
PendiksporAmed

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
PendiksporAmed
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
PendiksporAmed
40%BTTS - last 520%
PendiksporAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
PendiksporAmed
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
PendiksporAmed
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time26%
PendiksporAmed

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
PendiksporAmed
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
PendiksporAmed
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
PendiksporAmed

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - Pendikspor · 1.7 pts / match - Amed

Pendikspor - half-time state
17% leading65% draw17% trailing
Amed - half-time state
43% leading39% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.7
PendiksporAmed
0.43Goals scored (1st half)1
PendiksporAmed
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
PendiksporAmed
0.96Average goals (1st half)1.57
PendiksporAmed
61%Clean sheet before half-time57%
PendiksporAmed
61%No goal before half-time39%
PendiksporAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

1.91Points per match (2nd half)1.65
PendiksporAmed
1.04Goals scored (2nd half)1.22
PendiksporAmed
0.3Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
PendiksporAmed
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.87
PendiksporAmed
78%Clean sheet after half-time57%
PendiksporAmed
43%No goal after half-time43%
PendiksporAmed

Pendikspor - second-half results

52% W35% D13% L
27
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding253%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amed - second-half results

43% W35% D22% L
39
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pendikspor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pendikspor
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
6
4
16-30
4
7
31-45
9
2
46-60
5
1
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Amed
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
6
5
16-30
12
7
31-45
9
1
46-60
5
6
61-75
14
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pendikspor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
182%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

PendiksporLigaAmed
Average goals in match▼ 2.302.88▲ 3.43
Both teams scored▼ 43%50%▲ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 43%54%▲ 70%
Clean sheets▲ 52%29%• 30%
Goal before half-time▼ 57%71%▲ 74%
Goal after half-time▼ 65%81%▼ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.88
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PendiksporYellow cardHakan Yeşil
  2. AmedYellow cardMehmet Murat Uçar
  3. PendiksporYellow cardHakan Yeşil
  4. AmedYellow cardTarkan Serbest
  5. PendiksporSubstitutionOn: Berkay SülüngözOff: Jonson Clarke-Harris
  6. AmedYellow cardSinan Kurt
  7. AmedSubstitutionOn: Atakan MüjdeOff: Sinan Kurt
  8. PendiksporYellow cardYiğit Fidan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Batuhan KolakMatches officiated: 9
5.89Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 233%Home wins44%Draws22%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pendikspor 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Amed Sportif Faaliyetler Kulübü
2 : 1
Pendik Spor Kulübü

FAQ

What was the result of Pendikspor vs Amed?

The 1. Lig match finished Pendikspor 0:2 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pendikspor vs Amed?

Pendikspor score 1.48 goals per game on average and Amed 2.22. The 1. Lig average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Pendikspor's matches and 57% of Amed's.

What form are Pendikspor and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games Pendikspor have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Amed 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pendikspor vs Amed?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.