Wales - Welsh Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Penybont vs Haverfordwest County: match statistics

Penybont vs Haverfordwest County: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Penybont played Haverfordwest County in Welsh Premier League (Wales). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Penybont: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Haverfordwest County: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Penybont scores 1.18 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Haverfordwest County scores 1.48 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.88 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Penybont 39%, Haverfordwest County 39%. Over 2.5: Penybont 42%, Haverfordwest County 52%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Haverfordwest County has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.42. Penybont: 10.4 shots per match, Haverfordwest County: 11.7.

Match halves

Penybont: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.79. Haverfordwest County: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Penybont: 46-60 (11 goals). Haverfordwest County: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Welsh Premier League: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a Haverfordwest win. In the last 5 matches the visitors have a 3-1-1 record and scored 9 goals, while Penybont in their last 5 are 0-2-3 with only 1 goal; points per game in that period are 2.0 versus 0.4. At home Penybont average 1.00 goals scored and concede 0.88 per match, with xG 1.57 from 10.56 shots and 4 on target, indicating they create decent chances. Haverfordwest away average 1.06 goals scored and concede 1.41, have xG 1.32 from 10 shots per match and 4 on target, and the visitors’ shot conversion is 11% versus 9% for the hosts. Despite the hosts having a slightly better xG and higher league position (Penybont 3rd, Haverfordwest 9th), the visitors’ superior form and efficiency (9 goals vs 1 in the last 5) and a lower share of matches without a goal for the visitors (35% vs 44%) determine my prediction.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal metrics show Penybont with BTTS in 50% of matches and Haverfordwest only 29%, against a league average of 51%, already indicating a tilt toward single-team scorelines rather than both teams. The strongest signal against BTTS is the last 5 fixtures, where both teams combined have only 20% BTTS, meaning both sides rarely scored in the same game recently. Scoring forms are divergent: Penybont over the last 5 matches averages 0.2 goals scored and concedes 1.2, while Haverfordwest scores 1.8 and concedes 0.4, increasing the probability that the hosts may fail to find the net. Additionally clean sheet rates are 44% for Penybont and 41% for Haverfordwest, and Haverfordwest has 35% of matches with FTS (failed to score), which further lowers BTTS probability. Although seasonal xG are 1.61 (Penybont) and 1.32 (Haverfordwest) and SOT 5.88 vs 4.0 provide some goal potential, the dominant signal is the low BTTS trend in recent games and I recommend the "No" (No Goal) option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Average xG points to a total expected goals around 2.83: home xG (Penybont) 1.61, while Haverfordwest’s away xG conceded is 1.39, giving ≈1.50 for the home side; away xG is 1.32 with Penybont’s xG conceded 1.33, giving ≈1.33 for the visitors. Seasonal figures confirm the hosts’ offensive profile — Penybont average 1.94 goals at home with 5.88 shots on target and a 14% conversion rate, versus Haverfordwest’s 1.06 goals away, 4.0 shots on target and 11% conversion. The last 5 matches, however, favor the visitors: Haverfordwest have scored 9 goals in their last 5 games while Penybont only 1, which may slightly boost the visitors’ attacking potential. With an expected total xG ≈2.83 I estimate probabilities of Over 1.5 goals at ~77%, Over 2.5 at ~54% and Over 3.5 at ~31%, consistent with seasonal Over1.5 rates (75% for hosts, 65% for guests) and moderate Over2.5 rates (63% vs 41%). Given these numbers the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is betting Over 1.5 (highest probability ~77%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seasonal metrics favor the home side — Penybont scores an average of 1.94 goals per match with xG 1.61 versus Haverfordwest’s 1.06 goals and xG 1.32, and records 5.88 shots on target per game compared to the visitors’ 4.0. However, form over the last five matches favors Haverfordwest: the visitors have won 60% of those games (3 of 5), while the hosts have no wins in their last five (0%). In the first halves of their last five matches Penybont averages 0.0 goals at the break, while Haverfordwest averages 0.8, and the visitors have led at the break in 40% of their last five matches versus 0% for the hosts, which increases the likelihood of Haverfordwest leading at half-time. Additionally, the visitors average 2.2 points in second halves over the last five matches compared to 1.0 point for the hosts, so the strongest signal points to the visitors leading at half-time and winning by full-time (HT/FT: 2/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
PenybontHaverfordwest County
5Shots8
PenybontHaverfordwest County
3Shots on target0
PenybontHaverfordwest County
0.79xG1.01
PenybontHaverfordwest County
1Corners4
PenybontHaverfordwest County
35Dangerous attacks67
PenybontHaverfordwest County
-1Fouls-1
PenybontHaverfordwest County
3Cards1
PenybontHaverfordwest County

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PenybontHaverfordwest County
1.18Goals scored / match1.48
PenybontHaverfordwest County
1.48Goals conceded / match1.33
PenybontHaverfordwest County
49%Average possession50%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
3.7Shots on target / match4.91
PenybontHaverfordwest County

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.45Shots per match11.7
PenybontHaverfordwest County
3.7Shots on target4.91
PenybontHaverfordwest County
11.3%Shot conversion12.7%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
49%Possession50%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
1.42xG for1.46
PenybontHaverfordwest County
1.47xG against1.36
PenybontHaverfordwest County

Shooting quality

Penybont: BalancedHaverfordwest County: Balanced
PenybontHaverfordwest County
Accuracy (shots on target)35%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haverfordwest County is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Penybont · 2 pts / match - Haverfordwest County

Penybont
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W27% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-13
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-5
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Haverfordwest County
LWWWD
Season result split
42% W21% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-7-12
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-6
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haverfordwest County is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Penybont · 1.48 goals / match - Haverfordwest County

Haverfordwest County is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.48 goals / match - Penybont · 1.33 goals / match - Haverfordwest County

Penybont scoring profile: mixed

Penybont scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Haverfordwest County keeps a clean sheet in 42% (14 of 33 matches).

Haverfordwest County scoring profile: strong

Haverfordwest County scores in 79% of matches (26 of 33 matches), while Penybont keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).

39Goals scored (season)49
PenybontHaverfordwest County
49Goals conceded (season)44
PenybontHaverfordwest County
2.67Average goals in match2.82
PenybontHaverfordwest County
1Goals scored (last 5)9
PenybontHaverfordwest County
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
PenybontHaverfordwest County

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal79%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
30%2 goals45%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
15%3 goals15%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
12%4 goals3%
PenybontHaverfordwest County

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal58%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
39%2 goals39%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
18%3 goals27%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
12%4 goals6%
PenybontHaverfordwest County

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
Haverfordwest County - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 33 matches
51%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time3%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
9%BTTS in both halves0%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
15%Scored in both halves15%
PenybontHaverfordwest County

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
20%BTTS - last 520%
PenybontHaverfordwest County

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
PenybontHaverfordwest County

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
PenybontHaverfordwest County

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Haverfordwest County is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - Penybont · 1.27 pts / match - Haverfordwest County

Penybont - half-time state
15% leading52% draw33% trailing
Haverfordwest County - half-time state
30% leading36% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.27
PenybontHaverfordwest County
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.48
PenybontHaverfordwest County
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
PenybontHaverfordwest County
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.06
PenybontHaverfordwest County
58%Clean sheet before half-time64%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
73%No goal before half-time67%
PenybontHaverfordwest County

After half-time (2nd half)

1.36Points per match (2nd half)1.76
PenybontHaverfordwest County
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)1
PenybontHaverfordwest County
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
PenybontHaverfordwest County
1.58Average goals (2nd half)1.76
PenybontHaverfordwest County
48%Clean sheet after half-time58%
PenybontHaverfordwest County
55%No goal after half-time39%
PenybontHaverfordwest County

Penybont - second-half results

33% W36% R30% P
32
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding220%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Haverfordwest County - second-half results

52% W21% R27% P
42
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Penybont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.00.4
1 goal60%20%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-50
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Haverfordwest County - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Penybont
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
2
10
16-30
7
4
31-45
11
13
46-60
5
3
61-75
10
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Haverfordwest County
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
7
8
16-30
5
5
31-45
11
10
46-60
6
10
61-75
16
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Penybont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Haverfordwest County

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Welsh Premier League).

Teams vs league

PenybontLigaHaverfordwest County
Average goals in match 2.672.88 2.82
Both teams scored 39%51% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%54% 52%
Clean sheets 36%29% 42%
Goal before half-time 58%73% 67%
Goal after half-time 70%75% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.88
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PenybontGoalChris VenablesAssist: Ethan Cann
  2. PenybontYellow cardAshley Baker
  3. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Clayton GreenOff: Alexander Cvetkovic
  4. Haverfordwest CountySubstitutionOn: Will HughesOff: Owain Jones
  5. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Jacob JonesOff: Ashley Baker
  6. PenybontGoalMael DaviesAssist: Owen Pritchard
  7. PenybontYellow cardChris Venables
  8. Haverfordwest CountySubstitutionOn: Jacob BaconOff: Jack Bradley Wilson
  9. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Noah DaleyOff: Chris Venables
  10. Haverfordwest CountyYellow cardJacob Bacon
  11. PenybontYellow cardJac Clay

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

John Andrew JonesMatches officiated: 11
3.64Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 227%Home wins36%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Penybont 2 - 0 - 0 Haverfordwest County. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Penybont FC
2 : 1
Haverfordwest County AFC
Haverfordwest County AFC
0 : 1
Penybont FC

FAQ

What was the result of Penybont vs Haverfordwest County?

The Welsh Premier League match finished Penybont 2:0 Haverfordwest County. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Penybont and Haverfordwest County?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Penybont won 2, Haverfordwest County won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Penybont vs Haverfordwest County?

Penybont score 1.18 goals per game on average and Haverfordwest County 1.48. The Welsh Premier League average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Penybont's matches and 39% of Haverfordwest County's.

What form are Penybont and Haverfordwest County in?

Over the last 5 games Penybont have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Haverfordwest County 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Penybont vs Haverfordwest County?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.