Persepolis vs Chadormalu SC: match statistics
Persepolis presents a decisive advantage in home matches, where they have not lost a single meeting this season (44% wins, 56% draws), maintaining an impressive goal difference of +7 and conceding on average just 0.44 goals per match. The hosts also possess better form in the last five matches (1.4 points per game) compared to the catastrophic disposition of Chadormalu SC (0.4 points). The visitors present poor efficiency in away matches, not scoring a goal in the last five meetings overall, and their away record shows just 22% victories and a negative goal difference of -4. Persepolis disposes of better xG statistics (1.11 vs 1.07), higher shot efficiency (16% vs 14%), and greater possession control (51% vs 44%), which further speaks for a home win. Taking into account all indicators and the fact that Chadormalu SC has not won any of their last five matches, Persepolis has clear chances of achieving victory before their own audience.
Persepolis vs Chadormalu SC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Persepolis played Chadormalu SC in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 3 February 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Persepolis: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Chadormalu SC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Persepolis scores 1.11 and concedes 0.72 goals per match. Chadormalu SC scores 1.00 and concedes 0.94. League average: 1.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Persepolis 50%, Chadormalu SC 39%. Over 2.5: Persepolis 33%, Chadormalu SC 33%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 26%.
xG, shots and style
Persepolis has higher xG: 1.13 vs 0.90. Persepolis: 2.6 shots per match, Chadormalu SC: 3.0.
Match halves
Persepolis: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.61. Chadormalu SC: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Persepolis: 76-90+ (8 goals). Chadormalu SC: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.74 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 26%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Persepolis presents a decisive advantage in home matches, where they have not lost a single meeting this season (44% wins, 56% draws), maintaining an impressive goal difference of +7 and conceding on average just 0.44 goals per match. The hosts also possess better form in the last five matches (1.4 points per game) compared to the catastrophic disposition of Chadormalu SC (0.4 points). The visitors present poor efficiency in away matches, not scoring a goal in the last five meetings overall, and their away record shows just 22% victories and a negative goal difference of -4. Persepolis disposes of better xG statistics (1.11 vs 1.07), higher shot efficiency (16% vs 14%), and greater possession control (51% vs 44%), which further speaks for a home win. Taking into account all indicators and the fact that Chadormalu SC has not won any of their last five matches, Persepolis has clear chances of achieving victory before their own audience.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Persepolis | Chadormalu SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 54% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.43 | 0.30 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.54 | 0.62 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Persepolis is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Persepolis · 1 pts / match - Chadormalu SC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Persepolis is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.11 goals / match - Persepolis · 1 goals / match - Chadormalu SC
Persepolis is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.72 goals / match - Persepolis · 0.94 goals / match - Chadormalu SC
Persepolis scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while Chadormalu SC keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 matches).
Chadormalu SC scores in 50% of matches (9 of 18 matches), while Persepolis keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persepolis
Over / Under - Chadormalu SC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Persepolis is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / match - Persepolis · 1 pts / match - Chadormalu SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persepolis - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chadormalu SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Persepolis
Chadormalu SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Persepolis | Liga | Chadormalu SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.83 | 1.74 | ▲ 1.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 38% | • 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 52% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | • 61% | 60% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Persepolis 0 - 1 - 0 Chadormalu SC. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Persepolis vs Chadormalu SC?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Persepolis 1:0 Chadormalu SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persepolis vs Chadormalu SC?
Persepolis score 1.11 goals per game on average and Chadormalu SC 1.00. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Persepolis's matches and 39% of Chadormalu SC's.
What form are Persepolis and Chadormalu SC in?
Over the last 5 games Persepolis have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Chadormalu SC 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persepolis vs Chadormalu SC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Persepolis vs Chadormalu SC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.