Persijap vs Bhayangkara: match statistics
Persijap vs Bhayangkara: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Persijap played Bhayangkara in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Persijap: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Bhayangkara: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Persijap scores 0.85 and concedes 1.58 goals per match. Bhayangkara scores 1.35 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Persijap 50%, Bhayangkara 50%. Over 2.5: Persijap 54%, Bhayangkara 42%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Persijap has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.28. Persijap: 11.4 shots per match, Bhayangkara: 10.4.
Match halves
Persijap: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.58. Bhayangkara: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Persijap: 61-75 (7 goals). Bhayangkara: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Bhayangkara — the team sits 5th in the table compared to Persijap’s 14th and has won 5 of its last 5 matches, scoring 15 goals (3.0 per game), while Persijap has 1 win and 4 draws and 5 goals in the last five (1.0 per game). Home advantage for Persijap is visible in chance creation: Persijap averages 12.46 shots at home, 4.54 on target, and an average xG of 1.49 per match, whereas Bhayangkara away records 9.38 shots, 3.38 on target and xG 1.17. However, Persijap is less efficient in finishing (shot conversion 8% vs 11% for Bhayangkara), meaning the higher home xG does not translate into goals; Persijap scores on average 1.00 goal at home despite xG 1.49. Defensively they are relatively even: Persijap concedes 1.23 goals per home game and Bhayangkara 1.46 away, with clean sheets in 31% and 23% of matches respectively, so the visitors’ edge stems mainly from better attacking form and conversion. Considering the higher league position, a 5-game winning streak with 15 goals and superior conversion (11%), I predict a Bhayangkara win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Analysis indicates BTTS - Yes is more likely — I assess it at 57% vs 43% for No. Persijap has a seasonal BTTS of 54% and fails to score in only 8% of matches (i.e. roughly 92% chance to score seasonally), while Bhayangkara has a seasonal BTTS of 46% and does not score in 38% of matches (approx. 62% chance to score). Additionally both teams have xG_for above 1: Persijap 1.41 and Bhayangkara 1.17 (combined xG 2.58), and the away side is in clear attacking form — 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 avg) with a recent xG_for of 1.54. Counterarguments are Persijap’s solid defense (seasonal goals conceded 0.77 and 38% clean sheets) and Bhayangkara’s lower seasonal goals average (1.08 per match), but the league BTTS trend of 55% and the cited metrics favor a Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining Persijap’s xG (1.41) with Bhayangkara’s defense, which concedes 1.56 xG on average, yields an expected 1.49 goals for the home side, while the combination of Bhayangkara’s xG (1.17) and Persijap’s defense (1.05 xG against) yields 1.11 for the visitors — total 2.60. Season metrics confirm a tendency for goals: Persijap has 77% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Bhayangkara 69%, and both teams have respectively 100% and 92% of matches with at least one goal. A Poisson model with lambda=2.60 prices the probability of Over 1.5 at ~73%, Over 2.5 at ~48% and Over 3.5 at ~26%, which aligns with season Over 2.5 rates (38% Persijap, 46% Bhayangkara). Bhayangkara have scored 15 goals in the last 5 matches (avg 3.0), Persijap 5 (avg 1.0); Persijap averages 11.46 shots and 3.62 on target with 14% conversion (Bhayangkara: 9.38/3.38/11%), which further supports a minimum two-goal scenario. Conclusion: the safest market is Over 1.5 (pick: Over, line 1.5) given the ~73% probability and consistency of xG with seasonal trends.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I tip 1/1 as the most likely HT/FT outcome: Persijap led at the break in 54% of matches and wins 62% of games this season, with an xG of 1.41 versus Bhayangkara’s 1.17, giving the home side an advantage in chance creation. The hosts average 1.62 goals scored and concede 0.77 per match, while the visitors average 1.08 scored and 1.46 conceded. Additionally, Persijap averages 11.46 shots (3.62 on target) with a 14% conversion rate compared to Bhayangkara’s 9.38 shots (3.38 on target) and 11% conversion. At half-time Persijap record 69% clean sheets and average 0.62 goals, while Bhayangkara have 54% clean sheets and average 0.69 goals at the break, indicating the hosts are less likely to concede before half-time (0.31 vs 0.69). One must also account for the visitors’ form: Bhayangkara have won 5 of their last 5 matches (100%) and led at the break in 60% of their last five games, so I also assign a significant share to scenarios featuring a draw at the break or a Bhayangkara lead. As a result, I set the probability distribution with 1/1 receiving the largest weight (30%), X/1 20% and X/X 12% as realistic alternatives, reflecting both Persijap’s seasonal xG and defensive advantage and Bhayangkara’s strong form.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Persijap | Bhayangkara | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Bhayangkara is 114% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Persijap · 3 pts / match - Bhayangkara
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bhayangkara is 59% better for: goals scored per match.
0.85 goals / match - Persijap · 1.35 goals / match - Bhayangkara
Bhayangkara is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.58 goals / match - Persijap · 1.12 goals / match - Bhayangkara
Persijap scores in 58% of matches (15 of 26 matches), while Bhayangkara keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).
Bhayangkara scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persijap
Over / Under - Bhayangkara
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bhayangkara is 114% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.81 pts / match - Persijap · 1.73 pts / match - Bhayangkara
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persijap - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Bhayangkara - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Persijap
Bhayangkara
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Persijap | Liga | Bhayangkara | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.42 | 2.72 | ▼ 2.46 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 52% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 26% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 70% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 81% | 83% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Persijap 0 - 0 - 1 Bhayangkara. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Persijap vs Bhayangkara?
The Liga 1 match finished Persijap 2:1 Bhayangkara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persijap vs Bhayangkara?
Persijap score 0.85 goals per game on average and Bhayangkara 1.35. The Liga 1 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Persijap's matches and 50% of Bhayangkara's.
What form are Persijap and Bhayangkara in?
Over the last 5 games Persijap have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Bhayangkara 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persijap vs Bhayangkara?
The statistical background for Persijap vs Bhayangkara — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


