Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Persik Kediri vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

135%(2.14)
X35%(3.20)
230%(2.99)

Persik Kediri displays catastrophic form in their last five matches (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses), which significantly weakens their position despite a decent home record (56% wins). PSIM Yogyakarta sits higher in the table (7th place vs 11th) and possesses better overall form (7 points in the last 5 matches vs 1 point for the hosts). The visitor shows solid efficiency on the road (40% wins, 40% clean sheets), though their recent away form is mixed. xG statistics are close for both teams, suggesting an even quality of play. Considering the hosts' form crisis, but their historical strength at home and the guests' stability on the road, a draw or a narrow victory for one of the sides seems most probable.

Persik Kediri vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Persik Kediri play PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 13 February 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Persik Kediri: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. PSIM Yogyakarta: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Persik Kediri scores 1.24 and concedes 1.79 goals per match. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.26 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Persik Kediri 68%, PSIM Yogyakarta 53%. Over 2.5: Persik Kediri 71%, PSIM Yogyakarta 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.42. Persik Kediri: 10.9 shots per match, PSIM Yogyakarta: 13.2.

Match halves

Persik Kediri: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.59. PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Persik Kediri: 31-45+ (10 goals). PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Persik Kediri displays catastrophic form in their last five matches (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses), which significantly weakens their position despite a decent home record (56% wins). PSIM Yogyakarta sits higher in the table (7th place vs 11th) and possesses better overall form (7 points in the last 5 matches vs 1 point for the hosts). The visitor shows solid efficiency on the road (40% wins, 40% clean sheets), though their recent away form is mixed. xG statistics are close for both teams, suggesting an even quality of play. Considering the hosts' form crisis, but their historical strength at home and the guests' stability on the road, a draw or a narrow victory for one of the sides seems most probable.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
12Shots8
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
5Shots on target3
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.56xG1.2
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
2Corners2
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
61Dangerous attacks66
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
6Fouls16
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
2Cards4
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.24Goals scored / match1.26
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.79Goals conceded / match1.29
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
55%Average possession59%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
4.18Shots on target / match4.41
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.91Shots per match13.18
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
4.18Shots on target4.41
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
11.3%Shot conversion9.6%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
55%Possession59%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.42xG for1.57
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.48xG against1.42
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

Persik Kediri: BalancedPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Persik Kediri
LWWLL
Season result split
32% W18% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-17
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-5-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
PSIM Yogyakarta
LLWWL
Season result split
32% W35% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-11
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-7
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.79 goals / match - Persik Kediri · 1.29 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Persik Kediri scoring profile: very strong

Persik Kediri scores in 76% of matches (26 of 34 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: very strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Persik Kediri keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).

42Goals scored (season)43
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
61Goals conceded (season)44
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
3.03Average goals in match2.56
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal74%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
35%2 goals38%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
12%3 goals12%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
0%4 goals3%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal71%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
53%2 goals41%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
26%3 goals15%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
9%4 goals3%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time18%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
12%Scored in both halves18%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
40%BTTS - last 540%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Persik Kediri is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Persik Kediri · 1.18 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Persik Kediri - half-time state
29% leading44% draw26% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.18
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.21Average goals (1st half)0.97
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
62%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
59%No goal before half-time65%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.24Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.82Average goals (2nd half)1.59
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
15%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
53%No goal after half-time44%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Persik Kediri - second-half results

12% W35% R53% P
45
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-22
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

35% W32% R32% P
40
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persik Kediri - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Persik Kediri
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
8
6
16-30
10
9
31-45
5
12
46-60
6
14
61-75
9
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
6
8
46-60
11
6
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Persik Kediri

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

Persik KediriLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals in match 3.032.80 2.56
Both teams scored 68%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%54% 50%
Clean sheets 12%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 65%72% 62%
Goal after half-time 91%81% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Persik Kediri 0 - 0 - 1 PSIM Yogyakarta. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

PSIM Yogyakarta
2 : 1
Persik Kediri

FAQ

What was the result of Persik Kediri vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The Liga 1 match finished Persik Kediri 2:2 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Persik Kediri vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Persik Kediri score 1.24 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.26. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Persik Kediri's matches and 53% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are Persik Kediri and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games Persik Kediri have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persik Kediri vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.