Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 22 July 2026

Persiku Kudus vs Persela: match statistics

Persiku Kudus crest
Persiku Kudus
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Persela crest
Persela
130%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
240%(0.00)

Persela demonstrates significantly better form and defensive stability in away matches. The visitors have a 40% win rate away from home and a positive goal difference (+4), while Persiku Kudus performs poorly at home with only 22% wins and a negative goal difference (-5). Persela concedes an average of only 0.8 goals per away match, which, combined with a 30% clean sheet rate, indicates a solid defense. Persiku Kudus loses as many as 56% of home matches and concedes an average of 1.78 goals per game. The form from the last five matches also favors the visitors (1.2 PPG vs 1.6 PPG for the hosts), however, Persela has a tendency to draw away from home (40%), which makes this outcome also likely. Taking all statistics into account, Persela has the advantage, although it is not a certain victory.

Persiku Kudus vs Persela: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Persiku Kudus play Persela in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match date is 21 February 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Persiku Kudus: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Persela: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Persiku Kudus scores 1.30 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Persela scores 1.26 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Persiku Kudus 56%, Persela 48%. Over 2.5: Persiku Kudus 56%, Persela 37%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Persiku Kudus has higher xG: 1.16 vs 1.11. Persiku Kudus: 8.9 shots per match, Persela: 8.0.

Match halves

Persiku Kudus: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.89. Persela: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

Persiku Kudus: 76-90+ (13 goals). Persela: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Persela demonstrates significantly better form and defensive stability in away matches. The visitors have a 40% win rate away from home and a positive goal difference (+4), while Persiku Kudus performs poorly at home with only 22% wins and a negative goal difference (-5). Persela concedes an average of only 0.8 goals per away match, which, combined with a 30% clean sheet rate, indicates a solid defense. Persiku Kudus loses as many as 56% of home matches and concedes an average of 1.78 goals per game. The form from the last five matches also favors the visitors (1.2 PPG vs 1.6 PPG for the hosts), however, Persela has a tendency to draw away from home (40%), which makes this outcome also likely. Taking all statistics into account, Persela has the advantage, although it is not a certain victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Persiku KudusPersela
16Shots2
Persiku KudusPersela
5Shots on target1
Persiku KudusPersela
1.78xG0.46
Persiku KudusPersela
5Corners9
Persiku KudusPersela
60Dangerous attacks35
Persiku KudusPersela
-1Fouls-1
Persiku KudusPersela
1Cards4
Persiku KudusPersela

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.3Goals scored / match1.26
Persiku KudusPersela
1.56Goals conceded / match0.96
Persiku KudusPersela
51%Average possession45%
Persiku KudusPersela
3.56Shots on target / match2.89
Persiku KudusPersela

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.93Shots per match7.96
Persiku KudusPersela
3.56Shots on target2.89
Persiku KudusPersela
14.5%Shot conversion15.8%
Persiku KudusPersela
51%Possession45%
Persiku KudusPersela
1.16xG for1.11
Persiku KudusPersela
1.27xG against1.45
Persiku KudusPersela

Shooting quality

Persiku Kudus: Efficient finishingPersela: Counter-attacking
Persiku KudusPersela
Accuracy (shots on target)40%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Persela is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Persiku Kudus · 1.6 pts / match - Persela

Persiku Kudus
WDLLL
Season result split
26% W22% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-14
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Persela
WDWDL
Season result split
41% W30% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-8
1.52 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Persela is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - Persiku Kudus · 0.96 goals / match - Persela

Persiku Kudus scoring profile: strong

Persiku Kudus scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Persela keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

Persela scoring profile: very strong

Persela scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while Persiku Kudus keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).

35Goals scored (season)34
Persiku KudusPersela
42Goals conceded (season)26
Persiku KudusPersela
2.85Average goals in match2.22
Persiku KudusPersela
6Goals scored (last 5)10
Persiku KudusPersela
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
Persiku KudusPersela

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal67%
Persiku KudusPersela
30%2 goals33%
Persiku KudusPersela
19%3 goals11%
Persiku KudusPersela
11%4 goals4%
Persiku KudusPersela

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal70%
Persiku KudusPersela
48%2 goals15%
Persiku KudusPersela
22%3 goals4%
Persiku KudusPersela
7%4 goals4%
Persiku KudusPersela

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time11%
Persiku KudusPersela
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Persiku KudusPersela
19%Scored in both halves19%
Persiku KudusPersela

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Persiku KudusPersela
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Persiku KudusPersela
60%BTTS - last 560%
Persiku KudusPersela

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
Persiku KudusPersela
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
Persiku KudusPersela
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Persiku KudusPersela

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Persiku KudusPersela
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
Persiku KudusPersela
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Persiku KudusPersela

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Persela is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Persiku Kudus · 1.19 pts / match - Persela

Persiku Kudus - half-time state
19% leading52% draw30% trailing
Persela - half-time state
22% leading52% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.19
Persiku KudusPersela
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.37
Persiku KudusPersela
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Persiku KudusPersela
1.04Average goals (1st half)0.78
Persiku KudusPersela
52%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Persiku KudusPersela
67%No goal before half-time74%
Persiku KudusPersela

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per match (2nd half)1.81
Persiku KudusPersela
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
Persiku KudusPersela
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Persiku KudusPersela
1.81Average goals (2nd half)1.44
Persiku KudusPersela
41%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Persiku KudusPersela
44%No goal after half-time41%
Persiku KudusPersela

Persiku Kudus - second-half results

33% W26% R41% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding137%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persela - second-half results

52% W26% R22% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding186%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persiku Kudus - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-5+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Persela - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Persiku Kudus
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
10
31-45
5
7
46-60
6
7
61-75
13
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Persela
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
3
1
16-30
5
6
31-45
9
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
14
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Persiku Kudus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Persela

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

Persiku KudusLigaPersela
Average goals in match 2.852.79 2.22
Both teams scored 56%51% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%49% 37%
Clean sheets 22%28% 30%
Goal before half-time 63%70% 52%
Goal after half-time 85%79% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Persiku Kudus 0 - 1 - 1 Persela. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Persiku Kudus
1 : 1
Persela
Persela
2 : 1
Persiku Kudus

FAQ

What was the result of Persiku Kudus vs Persela?

The Liga 2 match finished Persiku Kudus 1:0 Persela. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Persiku Kudus and Persela?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Persiku Kudus won 0, Persela won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Persiku Kudus vs Persela?

Persiku Kudus score 1.30 goals per game on average and Persela 1.26. The Liga 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Persiku Kudus's matches and 48% of Persela's.

What form are Persiku Kudus and Persela in?

Over the last 5 games Persiku Kudus have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Persela 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persiku Kudus vs Persela?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.