Persita vs Persis Solo: match statistics
Persita vs Persis Solo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Persita played Persis Solo in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 23 May 2026. Venue: Stadion Singa Perbangsa. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Persita: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Persis Solo: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Persita scores 1.12 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Persis Solo scores 1.09 and concedes 1.76. League average: 2.77 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Persita 36%, Persis Solo 58%. Over 2.5: Persita 36%, Persis Solo 61%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Persis Solo has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.24. Persita: 10.2 shots per match, Persis Solo: 11.4.
Match halves
Persita: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.61. Persis Solo: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.61.
Goals by minute
Persita: 76-90+ (10 goals). Persis Solo: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.77 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I forecast a Persita win (1) based on clear home statistical superiority. Persita averages 12.25 shots per home match (3.94 on target) with an 11% conversion rate and home xG 1.51, while Persis Solo on the road averages 9.19 shots (2.75 on target), 9% conversion and away xG 1.13. Defensively the gap is significant: Persita concedes 0.88 goals per game at home and keeps 31% clean sheets, whereas Persis concedes 1.94 goals away and has only 19% clean sheets; additionally Persita’s home goal difference is +8 versus Persis’s away -18. In the short term Persis has better recent offensive output (5 goals and 1.4 points on average in the last 5 matches vs Persita’s 2 goals and 0.8 points), but Persis have conceded 10 goals in their last 5 compared to Persita’s 7, which undermines their form advantage. Considering the superior xG, higher shot volume and more stable home defense, I assess Persita’s win probability at ~60%, draw 20% and away win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Persita has a seasonal BTTS rate of 65% versus Persis Solo's 50% and the league average of 53%, which immediately favors the Both Teams To Score market. Both sides concede frequently: Persita averages 1.59 goals conceded per match, Persis Solo 1.94, with xG against of 1.71 and 1.69 respectively — both teams allow around 1.7 xG per game. In attack Persita generates higher xG (1.62 vs 1.13) and more shots on target (5.06 vs 2.75), increasing the hosts' chance to score, while Persis in the last 5 matches has scored 5 goals (1.0 avg) and conceded 10 (2.0 avg), so they are also capable of finding the net. A weaker signal against BTTS is Persita’s recent form: only 2 goals scored in the last 5 (0.4 avg) and only a 20% recent BTTS rate, but the low clean sheet expected rates of 18% and 19% for both teams and a high league goals average of 2.77 incline me to choose 'BTTS - Yes' with an edge: 68% yes, 32% no.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Persita has an attacking xG of 1.62 while xG against Persis is 1.69, yielding an expected 1.66 goals for Persita; Persis has an attacking xG of 1.13 versus xG against Persita of 1.71, yielding 1.42 goals, totaling 3.08 expected goals. With a combined expectation of 3.08, a Poisson distribution translates to roughly an 81% probability for Over 1.5, about 59% for Over 2.5 and about 37% for Over 3.5. Seasonal indicators confirm a goals trend: Persita at home records Over 2.5 in 71% of matches, Persis away in 50%, and Over 1.5 occurs for both teams in around 75–76% of games; meanwhile BTTS is 65% for Persita and 50% for Persis. Additionally, Persis concedes a lot away (58 goals this season, averaging 1.94 per game), and Persita creates more chances (on average 13.53 shots and 5.06 shots on target per game versus Persis’s 9.19 and 2.75), which increases the likelihood of further goals. Therefore the strongest and safest signal from the data is to play Over on the 1.5 line, with an estimated probability of about 81%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Persita is favored to lead at the break: the hosts led at half-time in 6 home matches (35%), while Persis led away in only 1 match (6%). Additionally, Persita shows clearly superior offensive metrics: the home side’s average xG is 1.62 versus the visitors’ 1.13, average goals 1.35 versus 0.81 and 5.06 shots on target versus 2.75 for Persis, indicating a situational advantage. After the break the hosts score on average 0.76 goals and concede 0.88, while Persis scores 0.44 and concedes 1.00, so the visitors have a lower probability of mounting a turnaround. The first half in Persita’s matches features a goal in 82% of cases, but both teams scoring in the first half occurs in only 18% of home games, which supports a single home goal at half-time and retaining the lead. On this basis the most reliable signal is HT/FT 1/1 (estimated 26%), hence the recommendation for this pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Persita | Persis Solo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Persis Solo is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Persita · 1.4 pts / match - Persis Solo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Persita is 71% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.03 goals / match - Persita · 1.76 goals / match - Persis Solo
Persita scores in 55% of matches (18 of 33 matches), while Persis Solo keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).
Persis Solo scores in 64% of matches (21 of 33 matches), while Persita keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persita
Over / Under - Persis Solo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Persita is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / match - Persita · 1.03 pts / match - Persis Solo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persita - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Persis Solo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Persita
Persis Solo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Persita | Liga | Persis Solo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.15 | 2.77 | • 2.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 53% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 54% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 72% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 81% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- PersitaYellow cardJack Brown
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Persita 1 - 0 - 0 Persis Solo. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Persita vs Persis Solo?
The Liga 1 match finished Persita 1:3 Persis Solo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persita vs Persis Solo?
Persita score 1.12 goals per game on average and Persis Solo 1.09. The Liga 1 average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Persita's matches and 58% of Persis Solo's.
What form are Persita and Persis Solo in?
Over the last 5 games Persita have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Persis Solo 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persita vs Persis Solo?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Persita vs Persis Solo: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


