Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 11 September 2026

Petrojet vs ENPPI: match statistics

Petrojet crest
Petrojet
1 : 1half-time 1:0
ENPPI crest
ENPPI
135%(2.71)
X40%(2.69)
225%(3.00)

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced contest favoring a draw scenario. Petrojet records a substantial 57% draw rate in home matches, which is a very high figure, with a home goal difference of 0. ENPPI displays an even more defensive style on the road with 71% draws and only 0.86 goals conceded on average per match. Both teams have an identical shot conversion rate (13%) and similar xG values, suggesting comparable offensive potential. Recent form over the last five matches is slightly better for the hosts (1.8 PPG vs 1.4 PPG), giving them a slight psychological edge. Considering the defensive nature of both squads, low efficiency, and history of draws, a share of the points is the most probable outcome.

Petrojet vs ENPPI: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Petrojet played ENPPI in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 6 February 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Petrojet: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. ENPPI: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Petrojet scores 1.07 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. ENPPI scores 0.92 and concedes 0.69. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Petrojet 53%, ENPPI 38%. Over 2.5: Petrojet 47%, ENPPI 23%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Petrojet has higher xG: 1.19 vs 1.09. Petrojet: 10.2 shots per match, ENPPI: 8.8.

Match halves

Petrojet: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.47. ENPPI: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

Petrojet: 16-30 (5 goals). ENPPI: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced contest favoring a draw scenario. Petrojet records a substantial 57% draw rate in home matches, which is a very high figure, with a home goal difference of 0. ENPPI displays an even more defensive style on the road with 71% draws and only 0.86 goals conceded on average per match. Both teams have an identical shot conversion rate (13%) and similar xG values, suggesting comparable offensive potential. Recent form over the last five matches is slightly better for the hosts (1.8 PPG vs 1.4 PPG), giving them a slight psychological edge. Considering the defensive nature of both squads, low efficiency, and history of draws, a share of the points is the most probable outcome.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

34Possession (%)66
PetrojetENPPI
13Shots12
PetrojetENPPI
3Shots on target1
PetrojetENPPI
1.27xG1.19
PetrojetENPPI
4Corners2
PetrojetENPPI
33Dangerous attacks50
PetrojetENPPI
11Fouls13
PetrojetENPPI
4Cards0
PetrojetENPPI

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.07Goals scored / match0.92
PetrojetENPPI
1.2Goals conceded / match0.69
PetrojetENPPI
41%Average possession49%
PetrojetENPPI
2.67Shots on target / match3.08
PetrojetENPPI

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.2Shots per match8.77
PetrojetENPPI
2.67Shots on target3.08
PetrojetENPPI
10.5%Shot conversion10.5%
PetrojetENPPI
41%Possession49%
PetrojetENPPI
1.19xG for1.09
PetrojetENPPI
1.54xG against1.39
PetrojetENPPI

Shooting quality

Petrojet: BalancedENPPI: Balanced
PetrojetENPPI
Accuracy (shots on target)26%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

ENPPI is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Petrojet · 1.2 pts / match - ENPPI

Petrojet
DLWDL
Season result split
27% W47% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-4
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
ENPPI
DWDDL
Season result split
31% W54% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-2
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-1
Last 5 away
1-4-0
WDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Petrojet is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - Petrojet · 0.92 goals / match - ENPPI

ENPPI is 74% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - Petrojet · 0.69 goals / match - ENPPI

Petrojet scoring profile: mixed

Petrojet scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while ENPPI keeps a clean sheet in 54% (7 of 13 matches).

ENPPI scoring profile: strong

ENPPI scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Petrojet keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

16Goals scored (season)12
PetrojetENPPI
18Goals conceded (season)9
PetrojetENPPI
2.27Average goals in match1.62
PetrojetENPPI
7Goals scored (last 5)4
PetrojetENPPI
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
PetrojetENPPI

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal69%
PetrojetENPPI
27%2 goals15%
PetrojetENPPI
13%3 goals8%
PetrojetENPPI
0%4 goals0%
PetrojetENPPI

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal46%
PetrojetENPPI
47%2 goals23%
PetrojetENPPI
7%3 goals0%
PetrojetENPPI
0%4 goals0%
PetrojetENPPI

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time15%
PetrojetENPPI
7%BTTS in both halves0%
PetrojetENPPI
20%Scored in both halves15%
PetrojetENPPI

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
PetrojetENPPI
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
PetrojetENPPI
80%BTTS - last 560%
PetrojetENPPI

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
PetrojetENPPI
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
PetrojetENPPI
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PetrojetENPPI

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
PetrojetENPPI
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
PetrojetENPPI
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
PetrojetENPPI

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Petrojet is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - Petrojet · 1.54 pts / match - ENPPI

Petrojet - half-time state
40% leading53% draw7% trailing
ENPPI - half-time state
31% leading62% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)1.54
PetrojetENPPI
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.46
PetrojetENPPI
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.23
PetrojetENPPI
0.87Average goals (1st half)0.69
PetrojetENPPI
80%Clean sheet before half-time77%
PetrojetENPPI
47%No goal before half-time54%
PetrojetENPPI

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)1.31
PetrojetENPPI
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
PetrojetENPPI
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
PetrojetENPPI
1.4Average goals (2nd half)0.92
PetrojetENPPI
40%Clean sheet after half-time69%
PetrojetENPPI
67%No goal after half-time62%
PetrojetENPPI

Petrojet - second-half results

13% W53% D33% L
26
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ENPPI - second-half results

31% W38% D31% L
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Petrojet - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
ENPPI - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.80.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.20.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%100%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Petrojet
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
5
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
0
7
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

ENPPI
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.94
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Petrojet

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

ENPPI

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

PetrojetLigaENPPI
Average goals in match 2.272.03 1.62
Both teams scored 53%46% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%35% 23%
Clean sheets 33%35% 54%
Goal before half-time 60%58% 54%
Goal after half-time 67%68% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.03
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PetrojetRed cardMohamed Okasha
  2. PetrojetGoalBadr MoussaAssist: Mohamed Ibrahim
  3. ENPPISubstitutionOn: Hamed AbdallahOff: Sayed Said
  4. PetrojetYellow cardAdham Hamed
  5. ENPPISubstitutionOn: Aqtay AbdallahOff: Youssef Baba
  6. PetrojetYellow cardQobolwakhe Sibande
  7. ENPPISubstitutionOn: Ali EhabOff: Zeyad Kamal
  8. PetrojetSubstitutionOn: Sikou SonkoOff: Gabrila Chicoday

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Petrojet vs ENPPI?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Petrojet 1:1 ENPPI. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Petrojet vs ENPPI?

Petrojet score 1.07 goals per game on average and ENPPI 0.92. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Petrojet's matches and 38% of ENPPI's.

What form are Petrojet and ENPPI in?

Over the last 5 games Petrojet have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and ENPPI 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Petrojet vs ENPPI?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Petrojet vs ENPPI: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.