Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics
Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pharco played Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 22 November 2025. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Pharco: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pharco scores 0.42 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.25 and concedes 0.42. League average: 1.86 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pharco 25%, Ceramica Cleopatra 17%. Over 2.5: Pharco 8%, Ceramica Cleopatra 17%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Ceramica Cleopatra has higher xG: 1.16 vs 0.90. Pharco: 7.7 shots per match, Ceramica Cleopatra: 9.8.
Match halves
Pharco: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.25. Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.92.
Goals by minute
Pharco: 0-15 (1 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 1.86 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pharco | Ceramica Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 63% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Pharco · 2.6 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 198% better for: goals scored per match.
0.42 goals / match - Pharco · 1.25 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Ceramica Cleopatra is 98% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - Pharco · 0.42 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Pharco scores in 42% of matches (5 of 12 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 67% (8 of 12 matches).
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pharco
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Pharco · 1.33 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pharco
Ceramica Cleopatra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pharco | Liga | Ceramica Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.25 | 1.86 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 42% | ▼ 17% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 8% | 32% | ▼ 17% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 39% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 42% | 54% | ▼ 42% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 66% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Pharco 0:2 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
Pharco score 0.42 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.25. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Pharco's matches and 17% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.
What form are Pharco and Ceramica Cleopatra in?
Over the last 5 games Pharco have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.