Egypt - Second DivisionHaras El Hodoud StadiumData current as of 30 October 2026

Pharco vs Telecom Egypt SC: match statistics

Pharco crest
Pharco
4 : 1half-time 1:0
Telecom Egypt SC crest
Telecom Egypt SC

Pharco vs Telecom Egypt SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pharco played Telecom Egypt SC in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 30 October 2026. Venue: Haras El Hodoud Stadium. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Pharco: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Telecom Egypt SC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pharco scores 1.40 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Telecom Egypt SC scores 1.40 and concedes 0.70. League average: 2.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pharco 40%, Telecom Egypt SC 30%. Over 2.5: Pharco 50%, Telecom Egypt SC 40%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Telecom Egypt SC has higher xG: 1.25 vs 0.98. Pharco: 7.7 shots per match, Telecom Egypt SC: 9.5.

Match halves

Pharco: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.90. Telecom Egypt SC: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Pharco: 46-60 (4 goals). Telecom Egypt SC: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.33 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pharco have won 4 of their 5 home matches and concede an average of 0.6 goals there, giving the hosts a slight edge despite the teams’ similar overall records this season. Telecom Egypt SC, however, are in better recent form: they have taken 10 points from 5 matches and conceded just 2 goals, while Pharco have collected 6 points and conceded 8. The visitors also hold the edge in chance quality: away from home they average 1.36 xG compared with 0.80 xG for their opponents, while the corresponding figures for the hosts are 1.19 and 1.35. Pharco score an average of 1.4 goals at home, while Telecom average 1.6 away, so both sides have attacking arguments in their favour. The hosts’ strong home record tips the pick in their direction, although the visitors’ defensive improvement means they are not clear favourites.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes landed in 40% of Pharco’s matches and just 20% of Telecom Egypt SC’s, pointing to a scenario in which at least one team fails to score. Each team failed to score in 40% of its matches, while the visitors have conceded an average of just 0.4 goals across their last 5 games. Pharco average 1.2 goals scored against an xG of 1.03, so breaking down Telecom Egypt SC’s defence is far from certain. On the other hand, the visitors average 1.6 goals scored, and Pharco have conceded an average of 1.6 goals in their last 5 matches, increasing the likelihood of an away goal. The strongest signal therefore points to Telecom Egypt SC scoring without Pharco necessarily finding the net, so my pick is BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals: this outcome occurred in 80% of matches involving the two teams, while Under 2.5 goals landed in 60%. Pharco concede an average of 0.6 goals, and Telecom Egypt 0.8, which points against a very high-scoring game. However, the visitors have the edge in chance creation, with an average xG of 1.36 compared with the hosts’ 1.03, so a two- or three-goal outcome remains plausible. In their last five matches, Pharco did concede 1.6 goals per game, but Telecom Egypt conceded just 0.4, limiting the chances of both teams scoring. With a projected total of 2.30 goals, Under 3.5 offers a clearer edge than the lower goal lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Pharco were level at the break in 3 of the 5 matches covered, while Telecom Egypt were level in 2 of 5. The hosts have yet to trail at half-time and have conceded an average of just 0.2 goals in the first half, limiting the visitors’ chances of taking an early lead. After the break, however, the advantage shifts to Telecom Egypt: the visitors score an average of 1.2 goals compared with Pharco’s 0.4 and have won the second half in 60% of matches, compared with 20% for the hosts. Their stronger average xG, 1.36 versus 1.03, and better form over their last five matches—2.0 points per game compared with 1.2—also support an away win at full-time. Therefore, a draw at half-time followed by an away win after 90 minutes is the strongest signal, although the five-match sample calls for caution.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
4Shots4
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
4Shots on target4
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
0xG0
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
4Corners2
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
0Dangerous attacks0
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
-1Fouls-1
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
-1Cards-1
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
1.4Goals scored / match1.4
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
1Goals conceded / match0.7
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
51%Average possession51%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
3.5Shots on target / match3.5
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.7Shots per match9.5
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
3.5Shots on target3.5
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
18.2%Shot conversion14.7%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
51%Possession51%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
0.98xG for1.25
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
1.34xG against1.13
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

Shooting quality

Pharco: Efficient finishingTelecom Egypt SC: Efficient finishing
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
Accuracy (shots on target)45%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Telecom Egypt SC is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Pharco · 2 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Pharco
LLWWL
Season result split
60% W10% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-3
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Telecom Egypt SC
WWLWD
Season result split
60% W10% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-3
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Telecom Egypt SC is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Pharco · 0.7 goals / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Pharco scoring profile: strong

Pharco scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Telecom Egypt SC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).

Telecom Egypt SC scoring profile: mixed

Telecom Egypt SC scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 matches).

14Goals scored (season)14
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
10Goals conceded (season)7
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
2.4Average goals in match2.1
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
7Goals scored (last 5)7
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
8Goals conceded (last 5)2
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal60%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
50%2 goals50%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
10%3 goals30%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
0%4 goals0%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal60%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
20%2 goals10%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
20%3 goals0%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
10%4 goals0%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time20%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
20%Scored in both halves30%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
40%BTTS - last 520%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pharco is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / match - Pharco · 1.4 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Pharco - half-time state
40% leading50% draw10% trailing
Telecom Egypt SC - half-time state
30% leading50% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per match (1st half)1.4
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.6
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
0.9Average goals (1st half)1
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
80%Clean sheet before half-time60%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
50%No goal before half-time50%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.5
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
0.9Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.3
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.1
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
50%Clean sheet after half-time70%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC
50%No goal after half-time60%
PharcoTelecom Egypt SC

Pharco - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
17
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Telecom Egypt SC - second-half results

40% W30% D30% L
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pharco - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Telecom Egypt SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pharco
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Telecom Egypt SC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
4
0
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pharco

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Telecom Egypt SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

PharcoLigaTelecom Egypt SC
Average goals in match• 2.402.33▼ 2.10
Both teams scored▼ 40%50%▼ 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%43%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▲ 50%32%▲ 40%
Goal before half-time• 60%59%▲ 70%
Goal after half-time▼ 70%73%▼ 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.33
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PharcoGoalIbrahim Al Qadi
  2. PharcoGoalMohamed Gaber
  3. PharcoGoalKarim El Tayeeb

FAQ

What was the result of Pharco vs Telecom Egypt SC?

The Second Division match finished Pharco 4:1 Telecom Egypt SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pharco vs Telecom Egypt SC?

Pharco score 1.40 goals per game on average and Telecom Egypt SC 1.40. The Second Division average is 2.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Pharco's matches and 30% of Telecom Egypt SC's.

What form are Pharco and Telecom Egypt SC in?

Over the last 5 games Pharco have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Telecom Egypt SC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pharco vs Telecom Egypt SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.