Pharco vs Tersana: match statistics
Pharco vs Tersana: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pharco played Tersana in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 1 October 2026. Venue: Haras El Hodoud Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Pharco: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Tersana: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pharco scores 1.33 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Tersana scores 0.83 and concedes 0.83. League average: 2.02 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pharco 50%, Tersana 50%. Over 2.5: Pharco 50%, Tersana 17%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
Tersana has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.98. Pharco: 8.5 shots per match, Tersana: 9.3.
Match halves
Pharco: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.83. Tersana: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
Pharco: 46-60 (2 goals). Tersana: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pharco have won their last 3 home matches, scoring an average of 2 goals and conceding 0.67, while Tersana average 1 goal scored and 1 conceded away from home. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 win for the visitors, alongside 3 draws. This favours Pharco, though it also points to the risk of the points being shared. The hosts’ clinical finishing is an advantage: they convert 24% of their shots at home, compared with 14% for Tersana away, and Tersana have failed to score in 33% of their away matches. However, the gap in chance quality is narrow—Pharco’s home xG is 1.19, against Tersana’s away xG of 0.94—so a home win is the most likely outcome, but far from a certainty.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A goal from at least one team is more likely to be missing, particularly from Tersana: the visitors average 0.94 xG, while Pharco restrict their opponents to just 0.53 xG. Tersana score an average of 1.00 goal per match and register 3 shots on target, so their chances of scoring are not zero, but the hosts’ defence poses a clear obstacle. Pharco are not certain to score either: they average 0.67 goals, despite an xG of 1.43. The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by how often both teams have scored in their last 5 matches—60% for each side—but across the full season, the figure was 67% for Pharco and just 33% for Tersana. With the league average at 45% and each team failing to score in 33% of their matches, BTTS - No has a slight edge. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily mean a 0-0 draw.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals: all recorded matches for both teams finished below this line, although the sample size for each is small. Pharco score and concede an average of 0.67 goals, while Tersana average 1.0 goal, pointing to a moderate goal count. The home side record an xG of 1.43 but allow opponents just 0.53 xG; the corresponding figures for the visitors are 0.94 and 1.12. Pharco’s last five matches produced an average of 2.4 goals, compared with 1.8 in Tersana’s matches, against a league average of 2.02. A forecast of around 2.0 goals gives Under 3.5 a clearer edge than the riskier Under 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw is the most likely outcome: Pharco were level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches, and both teams conceded an average of just 0.2 goals in the first half over that period. After the break, I give the home side the edge: they scored an average of 1.0 goals in the second half across their last 5 matches, compared with Tersana’s 0.4. Over the same period, Pharco averaged 2.0 points per match, while Tersana averaged 1.2; the hosts also posted a higher average xG, 1.43 compared with 0.94, pointing to greater attacking potential. Tersana have averaged 2.0 points per match in their league games so far this season, compared with Pharco’s 1.0, so a full-time draw remains a significant alternative. However, the combination of cautious first halves and the hosts’ stronger recent performances after the break favors the X/1 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pharco | Tersana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pharco is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Pharco · 1.2 pts / match - Tersana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pharco is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Pharco · 0.83 goals / match - Tersana
Pharco scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).
Tersana scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pharco
Over / Under - Tersana
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tersana is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / match - Pharco · 1.83 pts / match - Tersana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tersana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pharco
Tersana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Pharco | Liga | Tersana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.17 | 2.02 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 35% | ▼ 17% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 34% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Pharco vs Tersana?
The Second Division match finished Pharco 0:1 Tersana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pharco vs Tersana?
Pharco score 1.33 goals per game on average and Tersana 0.83. The Second Division average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Pharco's matches and 50% of Tersana's.
What form are Pharco and Tersana in?
Over the last 5 games Pharco have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tersana 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pharco vs Tersana?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pharco vs Tersana: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.