United States - MLSData current as of 23 July 2026

Philadelphia Union vs Chicago Fire: match statistics

135%(2.20)
X40%(3.30)
225%(3.45)

Philadelphia Union are displaying very poor home form with a record of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 4 losses, resulting in a 0% home win rate. Nevertheless, the hosts show decent offensive metrics with an xG of 1.74 per home match and an average of 14.5 shots, suggesting potential for creating chances. Chicago Fire have an away record of 0-1-1, having not yet won on the road, but they have managed to keep clean sheets in 50% of matches and have slightly better overall form (0.8 PPG vs 0.2 PPG). Both teams struggle with efficiency (FTS% 50%), and the slight possession advantage for the visitors (53% vs 49%) along with similar xG Against values indicate a closely contested match. Considering the poor form of both teams, Chicago's high draw percentage on the road, and Philadelphia's tendency to create chances despite lacking results, the most likely scenario is a draw.

Philadelphia Union vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Philadelphia Union play Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The match date is 21 March 2026 at 21:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Philadelphia Union: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Chicago Fire: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Philadelphia Union scores 1.31 and concedes 1.94 goals per match. Chicago Fire scores 1.93 and concedes 1.27. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Philadelphia Union 69%, Chicago Fire 60%. Over 2.5: Philadelphia Union 63%, Chicago Fire 73%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Philadelphia Union has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.64. Philadelphia Union: 15.5 shots per match, Chicago Fire: 14.9.

Match halves

Philadelphia Union: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.81. Chicago Fire: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.13.

Goals by minute

Philadelphia Union: 76-90+ (5 goals). Chicago Fire: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Philadelphia Union are displaying very poor home form with a record of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 4 losses, resulting in a 0% home win rate. Nevertheless, the hosts show decent offensive metrics with an xG of 1.74 per home match and an average of 14.5 shots, suggesting potential for creating chances. Chicago Fire have an away record of 0-1-1, having not yet won on the road, but they have managed to keep clean sheets in 50% of matches and have slightly better overall form (0.8 PPG vs 0.2 PPG). Both teams struggle with efficiency (FTS% 50%), and the slight possession advantage for the visitors (53% vs 49%) along with similar xG Against values indicate a closely contested match. Considering the poor form of both teams, Chicago's high draw percentage on the road, and Philadelphia's tendency to create chances despite lacking results, the most likely scenario is a draw.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
12Shots11
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
3Shots on target4
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
1.32xG1.22
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
6Corners2
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
48Dangerous attacks32
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
11Fouls15
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
1Cards3
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
1.31Goals scored / match1.93
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
1.94Goals conceded / match1.27
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
46%Average possession53%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
4.69Shots on target / match5.13
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.5Shots per match14.87
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
4.69Shots on target5.13
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
8.5%Shot conversion13%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
46%Possession53%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
1.74xG for1.64
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
1.15xG against1.41
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

Shooting quality

Philadelphia Union: AttackingChicago Fire: Attacking
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
Accuracy (shots on target)30%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Philadelphia Union · 1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire

Philadelphia Union
LLDLW
Season result split
13% W25% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-10
0.63 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 2.11Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Chicago Fire
LWWWL
Season result split
53% W13% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-5
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Philadelphia Union · 1.93 goals / match - Chicago Fire

Chicago Fire is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.94 goals / match - Philadelphia Union · 1.27 goals / match - Chicago Fire

Philadelphia Union scoring profile: strong

Philadelphia Union scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Philadelphia Union keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

21Goals scored (season)29
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
31Goals conceded (season)19
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
3.25Average goals in match3.2
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
12Goals scored (last 5)10
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
14Goals conceded (last 5)8
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal93%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
31%2 goals60%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
25%3 goals27%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
6%4 goals7%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal60%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
56%2 goals40%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
25%3 goals27%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
13%4 goals0%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

69%
Philadelphia Union - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 16 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time33%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
0%BTTS in both halves13%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
13%Scored in both halves40%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
100%BTTS - last 580%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 123% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - Philadelphia Union · 1.67 pts / match - Chicago Fire

Philadelphia Union - half-time state
13% leading38% draw50% trailing
Chicago Fire - half-time state
40% leading47% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1.67
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.8
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.33
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
31%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
69%No goal before half-time33%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.4
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.87
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
44%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire
50%No goal after half-time33%
Philadelphia UnionChicago Fire

Philadelphia Union - second-half results

25% W38% R38% P
12
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chicago Fire - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Philadelphia Union - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.61.2
Average goals in match2.82.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Philadelphia Union
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
7
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
6
2
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
2
46-60
7
1
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Philadelphia Union

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Philadelphia UnionLigaChicago Fire
Average goals in match 3.253.31 3.20
Both teams scored 69%61% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%63% 73%
Clean sheets 13%22% 40%
Goal before half-time 81%77% 80%
Goal after half-time 75%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Philadelphia Union vs Chicago Fire?

The MLS match finished Philadelphia Union 1:2 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Philadelphia Union vs Chicago Fire?

Philadelphia Union score 1.31 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.93. The MLS average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Philadelphia Union's matches and 60% of Chicago Fire's.

What form are Philadelphia Union and Chicago Fire in?

Over the last 5 games Philadelphia Union have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Chicago Fire 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Philadelphia Union vs Chicago Fire?

The statistical background for Philadelphia Union vs Chicago Fire — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.