United States - MLSData current as of 22 October 2026

Philadelphia Union vs FC Cincinnati: match statistics

Philadelphia Union vs FC Cincinnati: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Philadelphia Union played FC Cincinnati in MLS (United States). The match was played on 9 September 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Philadelphia Union: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. FC Cincinnati: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Philadelphia Union scores 1.57 and concedes 1.70 goals per match. FC Cincinnati scores 2.23 and concedes 2.32. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Philadelphia Union 70%, FC Cincinnati 77%. Over 2.5: Philadelphia Union 61%, FC Cincinnati 68%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Philadelphia Union has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.59. Philadelphia Union: 16.3 shots per match, FC Cincinnati: 13.9.

Match halves

Philadelphia Union: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.04. FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.18.

Goals by minute

Philadelphia Union: 61-75 (9 goals). FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Philadelphia Union have stronger underlying numbers for a home win: they average 1.94 xG per match, while FC Cincinnati allow opponents 1.94 xG away from home and concede as many as 2.73 goals per game. The hosts also record 17.2 shots per home match compared with Cincinnati’s 12.09 away attempts, while their defence concedes just 1.1 goals on average. Cincinnati score 1.64 goals per away match and have a 14% conversion rate, but they have kept no clean sheets on the road, increasing Union’s chances of capitalising on their superiority in chance creation. Current form also slightly favours the hosts, who have collected 8 points and scored 9 goals in their last five matches, compared with the visitors’ 5 points and just 5 goals. A draw remains a realistic possibility, as Philadelphia draw 40% of their home matches, but Cincinnati’s poor away defence points towards a 1 result.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is very strong: BTTS occurred in 73% of Philadelphia Union matches and as many as 82% of FC Cincinnati fixtures, compared with the league average of 63%. In their last five matches, both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of cases, while Philadelphia averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, compared with Cincinnati’s 1.0 scored and 1.8 conceded. The hosts have a high average of 2.82 goals scored per match, whereas Cincinnati have not kept a single clean sheet this season and concede an average of 2.73 goals to opponents. The visitors’ potential to respond is supported by an xG of 1.45 for the season and 1.71 across their last five appearances, with an xG against Philadelphia of 1.65. The BTTS scenario is therefore clearly more likely than a match in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Philadelphia Union score an average of 2.82 goals at home, while FC Cincinnati concede as many as 2.73 goals away, clearly strengthening the outlook for a high-scoring game. The chance-creation potential is also high: the hosts’ average xG is 1.73 and the visitors’ 1.45, with both sides conceding xG at 1.65 and 1.94 respectively. In 91% of each team’s matches, at least 2 goals were scored, while Over 2.5 occurred in 64% of Philadelphia’s games and 73% of Cincinnati’s. In their last five matches, both teams recorded Over 2.5 in 60% of cases, while both teams scored in 80% of those games. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, as the consistent frequency of surpassing this line is supported by a forecast of 3.35 goals in the match overall.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Philadelphia Union have a clear advantage in full-match results: they win 64% of their matches and score an average of 2.82 goals, while FC Cincinnati win just 9% of their games and concede an average of 2.73 goals. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 6.64 shots on target compared with the opponents’ 5.45, while their xG stands at 1.73 versus Cincinnati’s 1.45. At half-time, Philadelphia were leading in 36% of matches, twice as often as the visitors, who were trailing at the break in 36% of games. The second half is particularly significant: Union score an average of 1.64 goals and win 55% of second-half outcomes, whereas Cincinnati score only 0.73 goals and lose 55% of second halves. The most likely scenario, therefore, remains a Philadelphia lead at the break followed by a home win at the final whistle (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
20Shots1
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
6Shots on target0
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
2.21xG0.21
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
7Corners1
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
74Dangerous attacks19
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
16Fouls6
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
0Cards4
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
1.57Goals scored / match2.23
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
1.7Goals conceded / match2.32
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
47%Average possession50%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
4.96Shots on target / match6.05
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.26Shots per match13.91
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
4.96Shots on target6.05
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
9.6%Shot conversion16%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
47%Possession50%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
1.8xG for1.59
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
1.1xG against1.8
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

Shooting quality

Philadelphia Union: AttackingFC Cincinnati: Efficient finishing
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
Accuracy (shots on target)31%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Philadelphia Union is 38% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Philadelphia Union · 1.6 pts / match - FC Cincinnati

Philadelphia Union
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W26% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-10
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
FC Cincinnati
WDWDL
Season result split
36% W32% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-7
1.41 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-5
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.57 goals / match - Philadelphia Union · 2.23 goals / match - FC Cincinnati

Philadelphia Union is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.7 goals / match - Philadelphia Union · 2.32 goals / match - FC Cincinnati

Philadelphia Union scoring profile: very strong

Philadelphia Union scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 matches).

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Philadelphia Union keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

36Goals scored (season)49
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
39Goals conceded (season)51
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
3.26Average goals in match4.55
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
11Goals scored (last 5)8
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
6Goals conceded (last 5)9
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal86%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
43%2 goals64%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
30%3 goals41%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
4%4 goals23%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal91%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
52%2 goals64%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
17%3 goals41%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
9%4 goals23%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

70%
Philadelphia Union - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 23 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time59%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
0%BTTS in both halves41%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
17%Scored in both halves50%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
80%BTTS - last 580%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time68%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time36%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time45%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FC Cincinnati is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / match - Philadelphia Union · 1.27 pts / match - FC Cincinnati

Philadelphia Union - half-time state
17% leading35% draw48% trailing
FC Cincinnati - half-time state
27% leading45% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per match (1st half)1.27
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
0.52Goals scored (1st half)1.05
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
0.96Goals conceded (1st half)1
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
1.48Average goals (1st half)2.05
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
35%Clean sheet before half-time36%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
61%No goal before half-time23%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)1.32
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
1.04Goals scored (2nd half)1.18
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)1.32
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
1.78Average goals (2nd half)2.5
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
52%Clean sheet after half-time23%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati
43%No goal after half-time41%
Philadelphia UnionFC Cincinnati

Philadelphia Union - second-half results

39% W35% D26% L
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

36% W23% D41% L
28
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Philadelphia Union - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.60
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-2+7
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Philadelphia Union
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
11
16-30
5
7
31-45
8
4
46-60
9
6
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
6
10
16-30
13
9
31-45
6
12
46-60
3
4
61-75
17
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.91
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
122%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
74%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Philadelphia Union

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
163%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Philadelphia UnionLigaFC Cincinnati
Average goals in match• 3.263.21▲ 4.55
Both teams scored▲ 70%63%▲ 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 61%62%▲ 68%
Clean sheets▼ 17%21%▼ 9%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%77%▲ 82%
Goal after half-time▼ 74%81%▲ 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC CincinnatiRed cardObinna Nwobodo
  2. FC CincinnatiYellow cardEvander da Silva Ferreira
  3. Philadelphia UnionGoalQuinn Sullivan
  4. Philadelphia UnionGoalBruno DamianiAssist: Cavan Sullivan
  5. Philadelphia UnionGoalBruno DamianiAssist: Quinn Sullivan
  6. Philadelphia UnionGoalBruno DamianiAssist: Cavan Sullivan
  7. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Brian AnungaOff: Gerardo Valenzuela
  8. Philadelphia UnionSubstitutionOn: Jesús Daniel Bueno AñezOff: Jovan Lukić
  9. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Samuel GidiOff: Ayoub Jabbari
  10. FC CincinnatiYellow cardBrian Anunga
  11. Philadelphia UnionGoalMilan Iloski

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Philadelphia Union vs FC Cincinnati?

The MLS match finished Philadelphia Union 5:0 FC Cincinnati. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Philadelphia Union vs FC Cincinnati?

Philadelphia Union score 1.57 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati 2.23. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Philadelphia Union's matches and 77% of FC Cincinnati's.

What form are Philadelphia Union and FC Cincinnati in?

Over the last 5 games Philadelphia Union have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and FC Cincinnati 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Philadelphia Union vs FC Cincinnati?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Philadelphia Union vs FC Cincinnati: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.