United States - MLSData current as of 08 September 2026

Philadelphia Union vs Nashville SC: match statistics

Philadelphia Union vs Nashville SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Philadelphia Union played Nashville SC in MLS (United States). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Philadelphia Union: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Nashville SC: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Philadelphia Union scores 0.90 and concedes 1.70 goals per match. Nashville SC scores 2.33 and concedes 0.67. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Philadelphia Union 60%, Nashville SC 44%. Over 2.5: Philadelphia Union 60%, Nashville SC 56%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Philadelphia Union has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.49. Philadelphia Union: 13.8 shots per match, Nashville SC: 12.7.

Match halves

Philadelphia Union: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.70. Nashville SC: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 1.22.

Goals by minute

Philadelphia Union: 76-90+ (4 goals). Nashville SC: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back an away win (Nashville SC): on the road this season they have 7 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, and in the last 5 matches they are 4-1 with 9 goals scored. Home side Philadelphia have only 1 win, 2 draws and 7 losses at home, scored 9 and conceded 17, with poor home form (run 'llld'). The gap is most pronounced in defense and efficiency — Nashville concedes 0.4 goals on average away and keep clean sheets in 60% of away games, whereas Philadelphia concede 1.25 at home and have 25% clean sheets. Offensively Philadelphia attempt more shots on average (14.5 vs 10.6) and have higher xG at home (1.69 vs 1.27), but convert that into just 0.5 goals with a 3% conversion rate, while Nashville score 1.0 goal on average away with a 9% conversion and 4.6 shots on target. Considering PPG in the last 5 matches (Nashville 2.4 vs Philadelphia 1.0), superior defense and higher efficiency, I assess the probabilities as: away win 65%, draw 20%, home win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict No BTTS with a 60% vs 40% probability, because Nashville’s defense has a clear advantage in key metrics. Nashville keeps a clean sheet in 60% of matches and concedes only 0.4 goals per game on average, totaling 6 goals conceded this season, with a season BTTS rate of 20%, which strongly supports No Goal. Philadelphia has the better attack on paper (xG 1.76, averaging 15.25 shots and 7.25 shots on target per game with a high conversion rate of 26%) and a 75% BTTS rate at home, but the last 5 matches show Nashville in form (WWWWL) with 9 goals scored in that period. Given the visitors’ dominant clean sheet indicator and the low 0.4 average goals conceded, I rate the No BTTS signal as stronger than the home side’s offensive signals.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I base this on xG: Philadelphia xG_for 1.76 vs Nashville xG_against 1.10, and Nashville xG_for 1.27 vs Philadelphia xG_against 0.91; the averages of these pairs yield expected goals Home 1.43 and Away 1.09, totaling 2.52. A Poisson model at total 2.52 gives probabilities Over 1.5 ≈72%, Over 2.5 ≈46% and Over 3.5 ≈25%, therefore the strongest signal is at the 1.5 line. Philadelphia averages 15.25 shots with 7.25 on target and has a conversion rate of 26%, which, given xG 1.76, increases the risk of home goals; their matches this season have 100% over 1.5 goals. Nashville averages 10.6 shots (4.6 on target) with a 9% conversion and has a lower BTTS rate (20%), so they have less ability to respond, though their xG_against 1.10 does not rule out conceding. Given the 72% chance of Over 1.5 and strong support from the home team's shots and conversion stats, I recommend backing the over at 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Philadelphia led at the break in 4 of 4 home matches this season (100%) and scored 11 first-half goals, averaging 2.25 goals in the first half, while Nashville averages only 0.2 first-half goals. Over the full 90 minutes the hosts score 4.0 goals per home game and have a 100% home win rate, whereas the away side scores 1.0 goals on the road and keeps a clean sheet in 60% of away matches. xG favors Philly 1.76 to 1.27 for Nashville, and shots on target 7.25 to 4.6, along with a high conversion rate of 26% versus 9%, confirm the hosts’ efficiency advantage. Given the hosts’ dominance in the first half and the conversion edge, the 1/1 HT/FT (lead at the break and full-time victory for the hosts) is assessed as the strongest scenario and therefore assigned the highest probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
16Shots8
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
4Shots on target1
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1.66xG0.8
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
5Corners2
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
51Dangerous attacks28
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
14Fouls11
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1Cards1
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0.9Goals scored / match2.33
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1.7Goals conceded / match0.67
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
49%Average possession54%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
3.7Shots on target / match5.78
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.8Shots per match12.67
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
3.7Shots on target5.78
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
6.5%Shot conversion18.4%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
49%Possession54%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1.57xG for1.49
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1.09xG against1.01
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Shooting quality

Philadelphia Union: BalancedNashville SC: Efficient finishing
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
Accuracy (shots on target)27%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nashville SC is 140% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Philadelphia Union · 2.4 pts / match - Nashville SC

Philadelphia Union
LWDDL
Season result split
10% W20% R70% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-7
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 at home
0-1-3
LLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Nashville SC
WLWWW
Season result split
78% W11% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-1
2.44 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nashville SC is 159% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - Philadelphia Union · 2.33 goals / match - Nashville SC

Nashville SC is 154% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.7 goals / match - Philadelphia Union · 0.67 goals / match - Nashville SC

Philadelphia Union scoring profile: mixed

Philadelphia Union scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Nashville SC keeps a clean sheet in 44% (4 of 9 matches).

Nashville SC scoring profile: very strong

Nashville SC scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Philadelphia Union keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).

9Goals scored (season)21
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
17Goals conceded (season)6
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
2.6Average goals in match3
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
6Goals scored (last 5)13
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal78%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
20%2 goals67%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
10%3 goals44%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0%4 goals33%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal56%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
60%2 goals11%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
20%3 goals0%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0%4 goals0%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
Philadelphia Union - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 10 matches
59%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time22%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0%BTTS in both halves11%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
10%Scored in both halves56%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
60%BTTS - last 540%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nashville SC is 233% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.6 pts / match - Philadelphia Union · 2 pts / match - Nashville SC

Philadelphia Union - half-time state
10% leading30% draw60% trailing
Nashville SC - half-time state
56% leading33% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.6Points per match (1st half)2
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0.2Goals scored (1st half)1.11
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1Average goals (1st half)1.44
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
30%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
80%No goal before half-time44%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per match (2nd half)2.11
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)1.22
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.56
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
40%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
50%No goal after half-time22%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Philadelphia Union - second-half results

10% W50% R40% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 10%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nashville SC - second-half results

56% W44% R0% P
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Philadelphia Union - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Nashville SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match1.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Philadelphia Union
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Nashville SC
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
5
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
4
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Philadelphia Union

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

Nashville SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.84
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
185%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Philadelphia UnionLigaNashville SC
Average goals in match 2.603.23 3.00
Both teams scored 60%59% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%62% 56%
Clean sheets 10%23% 44%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 67%
Goal after half-time 70%77% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.97
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+56%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Philadelphia UnionSubstitutionOn: Geiner Arleyson Martínez TurnerOff: Japhet Sery Larsen
  2. Philadelphia UnionYellow cardGeiner Arleyson Martínez Turner
  3. Nashville SCYellow cardDaniel Lovitz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Philadelphia Union vs Nashville SC?

The MLS match finished Philadelphia Union 0:0 Nashville SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Philadelphia Union vs Nashville SC?

Philadelphia Union score 0.90 goals per game on average and Nashville SC 2.33. The MLS average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Philadelphia Union's matches and 44% of Nashville SC's.

What form are Philadelphia Union and Nashville SC in?

Over the last 5 games Philadelphia Union have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Nashville SC 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Philadelphia Union vs Nashville SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.