Phoenix Rising vs Colorado Springs: match statistics
Phoenix Rising vs Colorado Springs: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Phoenix Rising played Colorado Springs in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 20 August 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Phoenix Rising: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Colorado Springs: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Phoenix Rising scores 1.44 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Colorado Springs scores 1.71 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Phoenix Rising 56%, Colorado Springs 71%. Over 2.5: Phoenix Rising 50%, Colorado Springs 64%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.49. Phoenix Rising: 12.4 shots per match, Colorado Springs: 14.5.
Match halves
Phoenix Rising: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00. Colorado Springs: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.14.
Goals by minute
Phoenix Rising: 76-90+ (8 goals). Colorado Springs: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-2. Average goals 2.80, BTTS 60%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Phoenix Rising have significantly stronger home numbers: they average 1.67 goals scored with an xG of 1.93, while Colorado Springs score just 1.11 goals away from home and create chances worth 1.48 xG. The hosts also register considerably more shots on target, averaging 6.78 per match compared with their opponents’ 2.89, which should translate into greater control over the volume of chances. Colorado Springs’ away defence concedes 1.67 goals per match and keeps a clean sheet in just 11% of its outings, while the team have lost 56% of their away fixtures. Phoenix Rising are not in particularly strong form either, having scored 5 goals and collected only 5 points in their last five matches, but Colorado Springs have scored the same number during that period despite playing one match fewer. Home advantage and the more favourable attacking profile point towards a narrow victory for the hosts, although their high home draw rate of 44% increases the likelihood of the points being shared.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Phoenix Rising have a very strong attacking profile: they average 2.00 goals, generate an xG of 1.89 and register 5.44 shots on target per match, while Colorado Springs concede an average of 1.67 goals. The hosts have recorded goals for both teams in 78% of their matches, well above the league average of 53%, while matches in which they failed to score accounted for just 11%. Colorado Springs have a lower season BTTS rate of 44%, but over their last five matches they have generated 1.74 xG, compared with Phoenix’s 1.19 xG conceded during the same period. The visitors have averaged only 1.00 goal across their last five appearances and have failed to score in as many as 44% of their matches this season, which limits confidence in the pick. However, both teams’ low clean-sheet rates of 11% support a BTTS - Yes scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Phoenix Rising average 2.00 goals per match, while Colorado Springs concede 1.67, clearly strengthening the case for at least two goals. The hosts also create chances worth 1.89 xG, compared with just 0.84 xG allowed by their opponents, while the visitors generate 1.48 xG, meaning their contribution to the total goal tally remains realistic. The Over 1.5 goals line has landed in 89% of Phoenix’s matches and 67% of Colorado Springs’ games, while both teams have kept a clean sheet in only 11% of their appearances. Recent form has been more subdued, with each team scoring 5 goals across five matches, and Over 2.5 occurring in 40% and 20% of those games, respectively. Therefore, Over 1.5 is the safest choice: it combines very strong season-long data with a moderate risk that the match will not exceed three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Phoenix finished the first half level in 78% of their matches, compared with 67% for Colorado Springs; over their last five games, these figures stood at 80% and 100%, respectively. After the break, the advantage should shift to the home side: Phoenix average 1.44 goals in second halves, while Colorado concede 1.22 goals during that period. Across the season, Phoenix score an average of 2.00 goals per match and win 56% of their games, compared with 1.11 goals and just 22% wins for Colorado Springs. The hosts also create significantly more dangerous chances, recording an xG of 1.89 versus the visitors’ 1.48, as well as 5.44 shots on target per match compared with 2.89 for the visitors. The X/1 scenario best combines a cautious, level start with Phoenix’s greater quality and markedly stronger second-half performances.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Phoenix Rising | Colorado Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Colorado Springs is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Phoenix Rising · 1.8 pts / match - Colorado Springs
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Springs is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.44 goals / match - Phoenix Rising · 1.71 goals / match - Colorado Springs
Phoenix Rising is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Phoenix Rising · 1.57 goals / match - Colorado Springs
Phoenix Rising scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
Colorado Springs scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Phoenix Rising keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Phoenix Rising
Over / Under - Colorado Springs
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Phoenix Rising is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.19 pts / match - Phoenix Rising · 1.07 pts / match - Colorado Springs
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Phoenix Rising - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Colorado Springs - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Phoenix Rising
Colorado Springs
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Phoenix Rising | Liga | Colorado Springs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.94 | 2.79 | ▲ 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 58% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 26% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 67% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | • 81% | 80% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Phoenix Rising 2 - 1 - 2 Colorado Springs. Average goals 2.80, both teams scored in 60% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Phoenix Rising vs Colorado Springs?
The USL Championship match finished Phoenix Rising 3:1 Colorado Springs. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Phoenix Rising and Colorado Springs?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Phoenix Rising won 2, Colorado Springs won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Phoenix Rising vs Colorado Springs?
Phoenix Rising score 1.44 goals per game on average and Colorado Springs 1.71. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Phoenix Rising's matches and 71% of Colorado Springs's.
What form are Phoenix Rising and Colorado Springs in?
Over the last 5 games Phoenix Rising have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Colorado Springs 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Phoenix Rising vs Colorado Springs?
The statistical background for Phoenix Rising vs Colorado Springs — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


