Italy - Serie C Group BData current as of 12 September 2026

Pianese vs Pineto: match statistics

Pianese crest
Pianese
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Pineto crest
Pineto
135%(2.25)
X35%(2.90)
230%(3.10)

Statistical analysis indicates very balanced chances for both teams. Pianese is showing solid form in their last five matches with a record of 2-3-0 and only three goals conceded, which indicates defensive improvement. Despite a better seasonal goal record (37:35), Pineto has recently shown poorer form with three defeats in their last five matches and as many as nine goals conceded. A key factor is the identical percentage of wins, draws, and losses at home for Pianese (36%-36%-29%) and away for Pineto (36%-36%-29%), which further confirms the balance. Considering similar xG, possession, and efficiency metrics, a draw seems the most likely outcome of this encounter.

Pianese vs Pineto: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pianese played Pineto in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match was played on 8 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Pianese: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Pineto: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pianese scores 1.03 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Pineto scores 1.32 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.27 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pianese 48%, Pineto 50%. Over 2.5: Pianese 28%, Pineto 43%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Pianese has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.27. Pianese: 10.7 shots per match, Pineto: 10.3.

Match halves

Pianese: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.41. Pineto: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.39.

Goals by minute

Pianese: 31-45+ (9 goals). Pineto: 0-15 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates very balanced chances for both teams. Pianese is showing solid form in their last five matches with a record of 2-3-0 and only three goals conceded, which indicates defensive improvement. Despite a better seasonal goal record (37:35), Pineto has recently shown poorer form with three defeats in their last five matches and as many as nine goals conceded. A key factor is the identical percentage of wins, draws, and losses at home for Pianese (36%-36%-29%) and away for Pineto (36%-36%-29%), which further confirms the balance. Considering similar xG, possession, and efficiency metrics, a draw seems the most likely outcome of this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
PianesePineto
7Shots12
PianesePineto
2Shots on target4
PianesePineto
1.09xG1.52
PianesePineto
4Corners2
PianesePineto
70Dangerous attacks66
PianesePineto
20Fouls17
PianesePineto
2Cards3
PianesePineto

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.03Goals scored / match1.32
PianesePineto
0.97Goals conceded / match1.25
PianesePineto
41%Average possession48%
PianesePineto
3.62Shots on target / match3.75
PianesePineto

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.69Shots per match10.32
PianesePineto
3.62Shots on target3.75
PianesePineto
9.7%Shot conversion12.8%
PianesePineto
41%Possession48%
PianesePineto
1.31xG for1.27
PianesePineto
1.29xG against1.46
PianesePineto

Shooting quality

Pianese: BalancedPineto: Balanced
PianesePineto
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pianese is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Pianese · 1.2 pts / match - Pineto

Pianese
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W45% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-13-7
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Pineto
LLLWW
Season result split
39% W32% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-8
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pineto is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.03 goals / match - Pianese · 1.32 goals / match - Pineto

Pianese is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - Pianese · 1.25 goals / match - Pineto

Pianese scoring profile: strong

Pianese scores in 62% of matches (18 of 29 matches), while Pineto keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).

Pineto scoring profile: very strong

Pineto scores in 82% of matches (23 of 28 matches), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 matches).

30Goals scored (season)37
PianesePineto
28Goals conceded (season)35
PianesePineto
2Average goals in match2.57
PianesePineto
5Goals scored (last 5)5
PianesePineto
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
PianesePineto

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal82%
PianesePineto
31%2 goals32%
PianesePineto
7%3 goals18%
PianesePineto
3%4 goals0%
PianesePineto

How often they concede at least...

66%1 goal68%
PianesePineto
24%2 goals32%
PianesePineto
3%3 goals25%
PianesePineto
3%4 goals0%
PianesePineto

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time25%
PianesePineto
0%BTTS in both halves4%
PianesePineto
14%Scored in both halves18%
PianesePineto

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
PianesePineto
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
PianesePineto
60%BTTS - last 540%
PianesePineto

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time89%
PianesePineto
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
PianesePineto
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
PianesePineto

2nd half

66%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
PianesePineto
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
PianesePineto
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
PianesePineto

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pineto is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Pianese · 1.64 pts / match - Pineto

Pianese - half-time state
24% leading66% draw10% trailing
Pineto - half-time state
46% leading25% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.64
PianesePineto
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.93
PianesePineto
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
PianesePineto
1Average goals (1st half)1.61
PianesePineto
69%Clean sheet before half-time54%
PianesePineto
55%No goal before half-time32%
PianesePineto

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1.07
PianesePineto
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
PianesePineto
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
PianesePineto
1Average goals (2nd half)0.96
PianesePineto
55%Clean sheet after half-time54%
PianesePineto
69%No goal after half-time68%
PianesePineto

Pianese - second-half results

21% W41% D38% L
40
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pineto - second-half results

18% W54% D29% L
46
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 39%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pianese - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+4-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Pineto - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pianese
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
4
2
16-30
9
8
31-45
5
1
46-60
2
7
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Pineto
ScoredConceded
11
2
0-15
8
9
16-30
7
8
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
8
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pianese

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Pineto

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

PianeseLigaPineto
Average goals in match 2.002.27 2.57
Both teams scored 48%50% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 28%39% 43%
Clean sheets 34%30% 32%
Goal before half-time 55%64% 89%
Goal after half-time 66%71% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.27
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.20
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PianeseYellow cardLuca Simeoni
  2. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Francesco ProiettoOff: Luca Simeoni
  3. PinetoYellow cardGianluca Germinario
  4. PinetoYellow cardAlessandro Tonti
  5. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Mamadou BaldeOff: Manuel Tirelli
  6. PianeseYellow cardMamadou Balde
  7. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Lorenzo PeliOff: Simone Ianesi
  8. PinetoYellow cardDomenico Frare

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pianese 0 - 1 - 0 Pineto. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Pineto
1 : 1
Pianese

FAQ

What was the result of Pianese vs Pineto?

The Serie C Group B match finished Pianese 1:0 Pineto. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pianese vs Pineto?

Pianese score 1.03 goals per game on average and Pineto 1.32. The Serie C Group B average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Pianese's matches and 50% of Pineto's.

What form are Pianese and Pineto in?

Over the last 5 games Pianese have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Pineto 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pianese vs Pineto?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.