Italy - Serie C Group BData current as of 06 September 2026

Pianese vs Pontedera: match statistics

Pianese crest
Pianese
2 : 2half-time 0:0
Pontedera crest
Pontedera
165%(1.98)
X25%(2.97)
210%(4.15)

Pianese are in decidedly better form, especially in home matches, where they win 40% of games and have a positive goal difference (+2). The hosts are unbeaten in their last five matches overall (2 wins, 3 draws) and average 1.8 points per game. Pontedera, on the other hand, perform very poorly away from home – they win only 7% of away matches, have a terrible goal difference (-16), and lose 67% of games as visitors. In their last five matches overall, Pontedera have averaged just 0.2 points per game, losing four out of five fixtures. The xG statistics also favour the hosts (1.38 vs 1.14), and Pianese score almost twice as many goals per home match as Pontedera do on the road. Considering all these factors, a Pianese victory is the most likely scenario.

Pianese vs Pontedera: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pianese played Pontedera in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Pianese: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Pontedera: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pianese scores 1.03 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Pontedera scores 0.80 and concedes 1.77. League average: 2.27 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pianese 47%, Pontedera 53%. Over 2.5: Pianese 27%, Pontedera 43%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Pontedera has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.30. Pianese: 10.6 shots per match, Pontedera: 10.9.

Match halves

Pianese: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.43. Pontedera: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Pianese: 31-45+ (9 goals). Pontedera: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pianese are in decidedly better form, especially in home matches, where they win 40% of games and have a positive goal difference (+2). The hosts are unbeaten in their last five matches overall (2 wins, 3 draws) and average 1.8 points per game. Pontedera, on the other hand, perform very poorly away from home – they win only 7% of away matches, have a terrible goal difference (-16), and lose 67% of games as visitors. In their last five matches overall, Pontedera have averaged just 0.2 points per game, losing four out of five fixtures. The xG statistics also favour the hosts (1.38 vs 1.14), and Pianese score almost twice as many goals per home match as Pontedera do on the road. Considering all these factors, a Pianese victory is the most likely scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
PianesePontedera
14Shots16
PianesePontedera
5Shots on target5
PianesePontedera
1.67xG1.92
PianesePontedera
6Corners9
PianesePontedera
60Dangerous attacks78
PianesePontedera
10Fouls15
PianesePontedera
1Cards4
PianesePontedera

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.03Goals scored / match0.8
PianesePontedera
0.93Goals conceded / match1.77
PianesePontedera
42%Average possession43%
PianesePontedera
3.57Shots on target / match3.03
PianesePontedera

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.57Shots per match10.9
PianesePontedera
3.57Shots on target3.03
PianesePontedera
9.8%Shot conversion7.3%
PianesePontedera
42%Possession43%
PianesePontedera
1.3xG for1.31
PianesePontedera
1.3xG against1.44
PianesePontedera

Shooting quality

Pianese: BalancedPontedera: Balanced
PianesePontedera
Accuracy (shots on target)34%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pianese is 800% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Pianese · 0.2 pts / match - Pontedera

Pianese
WDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W43% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-13-7
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Pontedera
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
10% W30% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-9-18
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-10
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pianese is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.03 goals / match - Pianese · 0.8 goals / match - Pontedera

Pianese is 90% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - Pianese · 1.77 goals / match - Pontedera

Pianese scoring profile: very strong

Pianese scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Pontedera keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 30 matches).

Pontedera scoring profile: mixed

Pontedera scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).

31Goals scored (season)24
PianesePontedera
28Goals conceded (season)53
PianesePontedera
1.97Average goals in match2.57
PianesePontedera
4Goals scored (last 5)3
PianesePontedera
2Goals conceded (last 5)8
PianesePontedera

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal60%
PianesePontedera
30%2 goals20%
PianesePontedera
7%3 goals0%
PianesePontedera
3%4 goals0%
PianesePontedera

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal93%
PianesePontedera
23%2 goals53%
PianesePontedera
3%3 goals20%
PianesePontedera
3%4 goals7%
PianesePontedera

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time7%
PianesePontedera
0%BTTS in both halves3%
PianesePontedera
13%Scored in both halves10%
PianesePontedera

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
PianesePontedera
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
PianesePontedera
40%BTTS - last 560%
PianesePontedera

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
PianesePontedera
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
PianesePontedera
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
PianesePontedera

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
PianesePontedera
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
PianesePontedera
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
PianesePontedera

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pianese is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.37 pts / match - Pianese · 0.93 pts / match - Pontedera

Pianese - half-time state
23% leading67% draw10% trailing
Pontedera - half-time state
23% leading23% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.37Points per match (1st half)0.93
PianesePontedera
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.3
PianesePontedera
0.37Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
PianesePontedera
0.97Average goals (1st half)1.03
PianesePontedera
70%Clean sheet before half-time43%
PianesePontedera
57%No goal before half-time70%
PianesePontedera

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per match (2nd half)0.8
PianesePontedera
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
PianesePontedera
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)1.03
PianesePontedera
1Average goals (2nd half)1.53
PianesePontedera
57%Clean sheet after half-time20%
PianesePontedera
67%No goal after half-time60%
PianesePontedera

Pianese - second-half results

23% W40% R37% P
41
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pontedera - second-half results

17% W30% R53% P
28
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding43%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 10%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pianese - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Pontedera - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pianese
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
4
2
16-30
9
8
31-45
6
1
46-60
2
7
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Pontedera
ScoredConceded
1
10
0-15
3
6
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
10
46-60
7
7
61-75
3
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.26
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pianese

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Pontedera

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

PianeseLigaPontedera
Average goals in match 1.972.27 2.57
Both teams scored 47%50% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%39% 43%
Clean sheets 37%29% 7%
Goal before half-time 53%63% 80%
Goal after half-time 67%72% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.27
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PontederaYellow cardFilippo Faggi
  2. PontederaYellow cardHerculano Bucancil Nabian
  3. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Christian SussiOff: Matteo Colombo
  4. PianeseGoalChristian Sussi
  5. PianeseYellow cardChristian Sussi
  6. PontederaYellow cardMatteo Manfredonia
  7. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Lorenzo CocciaOff: Claudio Mamah Martey
  8. PontederaSubstitutionOn: Francesco Dell'AquilaOff: Jeremy Kandje Mbambi
  9. PontederaGoalCristian Cerretti
  10. PianeseGoalEaston OngaroAssist: Lorenzo Coccia
  11. PontederaYellow cardHerculano Bucancil Nabian

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pianese 0 - 0 - 1 Pontedera. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Pontedera
2 : 0
Pianese

FAQ

What was the result of Pianese vs Pontedera?

The Serie C Group B match finished Pianese 2:2 Pontedera. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pianese vs Pontedera?

Pianese score 1.03 goals per game on average and Pontedera 0.80. The Serie C Group B average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Pianese's matches and 53% of Pontedera's.

What form are Pianese and Pontedera in?

Over the last 5 games Pianese have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Pontedera 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pianese vs Pontedera?

The statistical background for Pianese vs Pontedera — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.