Italy - Serie C Group BStadio Olimpico Carlo ZecchiniData current as of 15 October 2026

Pianese vs Ravenna: match statistics

Pianese crest
Pianese
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Ravenna crest
Ravenna

Pianese vs Ravenna: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pianese played Ravenna in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match was played on 4 October 2026. Venue: Stadio Olimpico Carlo Zecchini. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Pianese: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Ravenna: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pianese scores 0.57 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Ravenna scores 1.71 and concedes 0.29. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pianese 43%, Ravenna 29%. Over 2.5: Pianese 29%, Ravenna 29%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Pianese has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.75. Pianese: 15.7 shots per match, Ravenna: 13.9.

Match halves

Pianese: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.43. Ravenna: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Pianese: 76-90+ (2 goals). Ravenna: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ravenna have gone unbeaten in all 7 matches this season, winning 4 of their last 5 and keeping a clean sheet in each; Pianese, by contrast, have failed to win during the same period and have conceded 7 goals. Away from home, the visitors average 1 goal per match, while the hosts score just 0.33 goals per game at home and have failed to find the net in 67% of those fixtures. Pianese do create chances, however—their home xG is 1.86 compared with Ravenna’s 1.61 away from home—but poor finishing has limited their ability to turn those opportunities into results. The visitors’ defensive record gives them the edge: they concede an average of 0.25 goals away from home and keep a clean sheet in 75% of their matches. A draw remains a realistic possibility, as all of Pianese’s home games so far have ended level, but current form and finishing favour Ravenna.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - No is Ravenna’s defence: they have kept a clean sheet in their last 5 matches, despite opponents creating chances worth an average of 1.14 xG against them. Both teams scored in 25% of Ravenna’s away matches and 33% of Pianese’s home matches; the teams kept a clean sheet in 75% and 67% of those matches, respectively. However, Pianese have the potential to break this run, averaging 2.67 goals and 5.33 shots on target at home, while Ravenna average 1.00 goal and 3.00 shots on target away. Despite the home side’s attacking advantage, Ravenna’s defensive form and low BTTS frequency make a match in which at least one team fails to score more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: Ravenna have stayed below this line in every match included, while Pianese have done so in 67% of their games. Ravenna have kept a clean sheet in their last five matches, and only 20% of their games have finished with Over 2.5 goals, limiting the potential for a high-scoring game. However, Pianese create chances worth an average of 1.93 xG at home, while Ravenna record 1.61 xG away, so I am not expecting a match without goalscoring opportunities. The projected total of 2.30 goals accounts for this attacking potential as well as the visitors’ recent defensive strength, and points to a clearer edge for Under 3.5 goals than for lower lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as both teams were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, while Ravenna did not concede in the first half during that period. Pianese have averaged just 0.2 goals before half-time recently, although they led at the break in 2 of their 3 home matches. After the interval, form gives Ravenna the advantage: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Pianese have failed to win any and have lost 3. The visitors averaged 1.0 second-half goals in those matches and did not concede after the break, supporting the scenario of the match being decided in the second half. Pianese’s strong home record—3 wins in 3 matches—is a risk to this pick, however, so the edge for the X/2 scenario is not substantial.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

30Possession (%)70
PianeseRavenna
10Shots24
PianeseRavenna
4Shots on target8
PianeseRavenna
1.32xG2.83
PianeseRavenna
4Corners11
PianeseRavenna
56Dangerous attacks106
PianeseRavenna
7Fouls9
PianeseRavenna
1Cards2
PianeseRavenna

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.57Goals scored / match1.71
PianeseRavenna
1.29Goals conceded / match0.29
PianeseRavenna
49%Average possession57%
PianeseRavenna
5.14Shots on target / match4
PianeseRavenna

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.71Shots per match13.86
PianeseRavenna
5.14Shots on target4
PianeseRavenna
3.6%Shot conversion12.4%
PianeseRavenna
49%Possession57%
PianeseRavenna
1.86xG for1.75
PianeseRavenna
1.43xG against1.2
PianeseRavenna

Shooting quality

Pianese: AttackingRavenna: Balanced
PianeseRavenna
Accuracy (shots on target)33%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.110.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ravenna is 550% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Pianese · 2.6 pts / match - Ravenna

Pianese
LDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W43% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-4
0.43 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 at home
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.16Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Ravenna
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
71% W29% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-0
2.43 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 away
2-2-0
DDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ravenna is 200% better for: goals scored per match.

0.57 goals / match - Pianese · 1.71 goals / match - Ravenna

Ravenna is 345% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Pianese · 0.29 goals / match - Ravenna

Pianese scoring profile: more difficult

Pianese scores in 43% of matches (3 of 7 matches), while Ravenna keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 matches).

Ravenna scoring profile: very strong

Ravenna scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

4Goals scored (season)12
PianeseRavenna
9Goals conceded (season)2
PianeseRavenna
1.86Average goals in match2
PianeseRavenna
4Goals scored (last 5)8
PianeseRavenna
7Goals conceded (last 5)0
PianeseRavenna

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal86%
PianeseRavenna
14%2 goals57%
PianeseRavenna
0%3 goals29%
PianeseRavenna
0%4 goals0%
PianeseRavenna

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal29%
PianeseRavenna
43%2 goals0%
PianeseRavenna
14%3 goals0%
PianeseRavenna
0%4 goals0%
PianeseRavenna

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
PianeseRavenna
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PianeseRavenna
0%Scored in both halves14%
PianeseRavenna

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
PianeseRavenna
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
PianeseRavenna
60%BTTS - last 50%
PianeseRavenna

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
PianeseRavenna
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
PianeseRavenna
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
PianeseRavenna

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
PianeseRavenna
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
PianeseRavenna
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
PianeseRavenna

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ravenna is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.57 pts / match - Pianese · 1.71 pts / match - Ravenna

Pianese - half-time state
0% leading57% draw43% trailing
Ravenna - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.57Points per match (1st half)1.71
PianeseRavenna
0.14Goals scored (1st half)0.71
PianeseRavenna
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
PianeseRavenna
1Average goals (1st half)1
PianeseRavenna
43%Clean sheet before half-time71%
PianeseRavenna
86%No goal before half-time57%
PianeseRavenna

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)2.14
PianeseRavenna
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)1
PianeseRavenna
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0
PianeseRavenna
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1
PianeseRavenna
57%Clean sheet after half-time100%
PianeseRavenna
71%No goal after half-time43%
PianeseRavenna

Pianese - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ravenna - second-half results

57% W43% D0% L
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pianese - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ravenna - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pianese
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ravenna
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
4
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
75%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-74%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pianese

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
40%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Ravenna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.91
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
20%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

PianeseLigaRavenna
Average goals in match▼ 1.862.56▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▼ 43%56%▼ 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 29%48%▼ 29%
Clean sheets▲ 29%26%▲ 71%
Goal before half-time▼ 57%71%▼ 57%
Goal after half-time▼ 57%73%▼ 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PianeseGoalLeonardo Bellini
  2. RavennaGoalEdoardo SoleriAssist: Cristiano Bani
  3. RavennaYellow cardGiulio Donati
  4. PianeseYellow cardFrancesco Proietto
  5. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Tommaso CasalinoOff: Manuel Tirelli
  6. RavennaSubstitutionOn: Matteo MaggioOff: Joshua tenkorang
  7. RavennaSubstitutionOn: Benito Nicolas ViolaOff: Edoardo Duca
  8. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Lorenzo VigianiOff: Claudio Mamah Martey
  9. RavennaYellow cardVinicius Negro Di Stefano

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Pianese 0 - 1 - 1 Ravenna. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Ravenna
0 : 0
Pianese
Pianese
0 : 1
Ravenna

FAQ

What was the result of Pianese vs Ravenna?

The Serie C Group B match finished Pianese 2:1 Ravenna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pianese and Ravenna?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pianese won 0, Ravenna won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pianese vs Ravenna?

Pianese score 0.57 goals per game on average and Ravenna 1.71. The Serie C Group B average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Pianese's matches and 29% of Ravenna's.

What form are Pianese and Ravenna in?

Over the last 5 games Pianese have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Ravenna 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pianese vs Ravenna?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.