Pianese vs Ternana: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pianese played Ternana in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match was played on 21 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Pianese: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Ternana: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pianese scores 0.94 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Ternana scores 1.18 and concedes 0.94. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pianese 41%, Ternana 53%. Over 2.5: Pianese 24%, Ternana 29%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Ternana has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.22. Pianese: 9.8 shots per match, Ternana: 11.4.

Match halves

Pianese: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.35. Ternana: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Pianese: 31-45+ (5 goals). Ternana: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

68Possession (%)32
PianeseTernana
9Shots3
PianeseTernana
0Shots on target2
PianeseTernana
1.09xG0.81
PianeseTernana
4Corners1
PianeseTernana
71Dangerous attacks65
PianeseTernana
11Fouls13
PianeseTernana
1Cards5
PianeseTernana

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.94Goals scored / match1.18
PianeseTernana
1Goals conceded / match0.94
PianeseTernana
41%Average possession50%
PianeseTernana
3.06Shots on target / match3.65
PianeseTernana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.82Shots per match11.41
PianeseTernana
3.06Shots on target3.65
PianeseTernana
9.6%Shot conversion10.3%
PianeseTernana
41%Possession50%
PianeseTernana
1.22xG for1.54
PianeseTernana
1.32xG against1.17
PianeseTernana

Shooting quality

Pianese: BalancedTernana: Balanced
PianeseTernana
Accuracy (shots on target)31%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ternana is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Pianese · 2 pts / match - Ternana

Pianese
LWDWD
Season result split
29% W41% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-5
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Ternana
DWLWW
Season result split
41% W35% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-4
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-2
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ternana is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - Pianese · 1.18 goals / match - Ternana

Ternana is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Pianese · 0.94 goals / match - Ternana

Pianese scoring profile: strong

Pianese scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Ternana keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Ternana scoring profile: strong

Ternana scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).

16Goals scored (season)20
PianeseTernana
17Goals conceded (season)16
PianeseTernana
1.94Average goals in match2.12
PianeseTernana
5Goals scored (last 5)6
PianeseTernana
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
PianeseTernana

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal76%
PianeseTernana
29%2 goals35%
PianeseTernana
6%3 goals6%
PianeseTernana
0%4 goals0%
PianeseTernana

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal71%
PianeseTernana
24%2 goals18%
PianeseTernana
6%3 goals6%
PianeseTernana
6%4 goals0%
PianeseTernana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time24%
PianeseTernana
0%BTTS in both halves6%
PianeseTernana
12%Scored in both halves35%
PianeseTernana

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
PianeseTernana
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PianeseTernana
40%BTTS - last 540%
PianeseTernana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
PianeseTernana
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
PianeseTernana
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
PianeseTernana

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
PianeseTernana
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
PianeseTernana
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
PianeseTernana

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pianese - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing
Ternana - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.24
PianeseTernana
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.47
PianeseTernana
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
PianeseTernana
1Average goals (1st half)1
PianeseTernana
65%Clean sheet before half-time65%
PianeseTernana
59%No goal before half-time53%
PianeseTernana

After half-time (2nd half)

1.12Points per match (2nd half)1.76
PianeseTernana
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
PianeseTernana
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.41
PianeseTernana
0.94Average goals (2nd half)1.12
PianeseTernana
65%Clean sheet after half-time59%
PianeseTernana
71%No goal after half-time35%
PianeseTernana

Pianese - second-half results

24% W41% R35% P
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ternana - second-half results

47% W35% R18% P
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pianese - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Ternana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pianese
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
5
5
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Ternana
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pianese

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

Ternana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

PianeseLigaTernana
Average goals in match 1.942.23 2.12
Both teams scored 41%47% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 24%36% 29%
Clean sheets 35%31% 29%
Goal before half-time 53%59% 59%
Goal after half-time 59%73% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.20
Home goals / match
1.03
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TernanaRed cardAndrea Vallocchia
  2. TernanaYellow cardFrancesco D'Alterio
  3. TernanaSubstitutionOn: Marco GarettoOff: Marcelo Orellana
  4. TernanaYellow cardBruno Martella
  5. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Luca FabriziOff: Luca Simeoni
  6. TernanaSubstitutionOn: Biagio MeccarielloOff: Bruno Martella
  7. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Marco BertiniOff: Manuel Tirelli
  8. TernanaYellow cardStefano Pettinari
  9. PianeseYellow cardLuca Fabrizi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Pianese vs Ternana?

The Serie C Group B match finished Pianese 0:0 Ternana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pianese vs Ternana?

Pianese score 0.94 goals per game on average and Ternana 1.18. The Serie C Group B average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Pianese's matches and 53% of Ternana's.

What form are Pianese and Ternana in?

Over the last 5 games Pianese have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ternana 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pianese vs Ternana?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.