Italy - Serie C Group BStadio Olimpico Carlo ZecchiniData current as of 30 August 2026

Pianese vs Vado: match statistics

Pianese crest
Pianese
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Vado crest
Vado

Pianese vs Vado: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pianese played Vado in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match was played on 28 August 2026. Venue: Stadio Olimpico Carlo Zecchini. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Pianese: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. Vado: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pianese scores 0.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Vado scores 2.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 2.10 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pianese 0%, Vado 0%. Over 2.5: Pianese 0%, Vado 0%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Pianese has higher xG: 0.98 vs 0.80. Pianese: 9.0 shots per match, Vado: 7.0.

Match halves

Pianese: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Vado: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Pianese: 0-15 (0 goals). Vado: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.10 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Vado made the stronger start to the season, winning their only match so far 2-0, while Pianese suffered a 0-2 defeat. In their last five matches, both teams have scored 6 goals, but the visitors won 2 games and averaged 1.4 points per match, compared with Pianese’s 1 victory and 1 point. Pianese conceded 7 goals during this period, while Vado conceded as many as 11, suggesting that both defences may give opponents opportunities. Vado’s advantage nevertheless stems from their current league result and a clean sheet in their opening match, making the visitors slight favourites, although a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - No is marginally the stronger pick, as the league’s BTTS - Yes rate is only 25%, while the home side has kept a clean sheet in 100% of available home matches. Pianese have conceded an average of 1.4 goals over their last five games, but Vado have very limited creative potential, with an average xG of just 0.78 per match. However, both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of their last five matches, and each scored 1.2 goals per game during that period, which clearly increases the risk of an away goal. Nevertheless, Vado’s low attacking quality and the league’s defensive profile remain decisive, making the scenario in which at least one team fails to score more likely. BTTS - No means that at least one team does not score; it does not automatically mean a 0:0 result or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Data from the last five matches indicates an average of 2.6 goals in Pianese games (6 scored and 7 conceded) and as many as 3.4 goals in Vado games (6 scored and 11 conceded). Despite the visitors’ weaker defense, their average xG over this period is only 0.78, while Pianese create chances worth 1.45 xG. The hosts have stayed below the 2.5-goal line in 4 of their last 5 matches, while the league average is just 2.0 goals per game, with only 25% of matches featuring at least three goals. This profile points to a game finishing with two or three goals, giving Under 3.5 goals a clear edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Pianese leading at the break and holding on for the win, as the hosts were ahead after 45 minutes in 40% of their last five matches, while Vado were trailing at that stage in 50%. In the first halves, Pianese conceded an average of just 0.4 goals, compared with 1.5 for Vado, whose half-time goal difference stood at -3. The hosts scored an average of 0.6 goals after the break, while Vado managed only 0.25, limiting the visitors’ potential to recover from any deficit. However, both teams’ recent results have been inconsistent: Pianese averaged 1.0 point per match, while Vado averaged 1.4, meaning that Half-Time/Full-Time scenarios involving a draw at the break still retain a significant share. Seasonal data for the current matchup is based on a very small sample, so the hosts’ advantage is particularly clear in their first-half profile, but not strong enough to completely rule out an upset.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

35Possession (%)65
PianeseVado
10Shots8
PianeseVado
2Shots on target1
PianeseVado
1.21xG1.08
PianeseVado
8Corners6
PianeseVado
61Dangerous attacks68
PianeseVado
14Fouls9
PianeseVado
6Cards2
PianeseVado

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0Goals scored / match2
PianeseVado
2Goals conceded / match0
PianeseVado
43%Average possession43%
PianeseVado
3Shots on target / match2
PianeseVado

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9Shots per match7
PianeseVado
3Shots on target2
PianeseVado
0%Shot conversion28.6%
PianeseVado
43%Possession43%
PianeseVado
0.98xG for0.8
PianeseVado
2.13xG against0.79
PianeseVado

Shooting quality

Pianese: BalancedVado: Counter-attacking
PianeseVado
Accuracy (shots on target)33%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.001.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pianese
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 2.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Vado
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 0.79BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pianese scoring profile: more difficult

Pianese scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Vado keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).

Vado scoring profile: very strong

Vado scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

0Goals scored (season)2
PianeseVado
2Goals conceded (season)0
PianeseVado
2Average goals in match2
PianeseVado
0Goals scored (last 5)2
PianeseVado
2Goals conceded (last 5)0
PianeseVado

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal100%
PianeseVado
0%2 goals100%
PianeseVado
0%3 goals0%
PianeseVado
0%4 goals0%
PianeseVado

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal0%
PianeseVado
100%2 goals0%
PianeseVado
0%3 goals0%
PianeseVado
0%4 goals0%
PianeseVado

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
PianeseVado
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PianeseVado
0%Scored in both halves0%
PianeseVado

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
PianeseVado
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PianeseVado
0%BTTS - last 50%
PianeseVado

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
PianeseVado
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
PianeseVado
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PianeseVado

2nd half

0%Min. 1 goal after half-time0%
PianeseVado
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
PianeseVado
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PianeseVado

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pianese - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
Vado - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per match (1st half)3
PianeseVado
0Goals scored (1st half)2
PianeseVado
2Goals conceded (1st half)0
PianeseVado
2Average goals (1st half)2
PianeseVado
0%Clean sheet before half-time100%
PianeseVado
100%No goal before half-time0%
PianeseVado

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1
PianeseVado
0Goals scored (2nd half)0
PianeseVado
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0
PianeseVado
0Average goals (2nd half)0
PianeseVado
100%Clean sheet after half-time100%
PianeseVado
100%No goal after half-time100%
PianeseVado

Pianese - second-half results

0% W100% R0% P
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-2.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Vado - second-half results

0% W100% R0% P
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pianese - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match2.00.0
Average goals in match2.00.0
1 goal100%0%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Vado - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.00
Goals scored / match2.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match2.00.0
1 goal100%0%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pianese
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Vado
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.0 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
0%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pianese

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.98
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
400%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Vado

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.99
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
400%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-2.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

PianeseLigaVado
Average goals in match 2.002.10 2.00
Both teams scored 0%40% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%30% 0%
Clean sheets 0%35% 100%
Goal before half-time 100%80% 100%
Goal after half-time 0%70% 0%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.10
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
0.50
Away goals / match
+220%
Home attack advantage
+69%
Home defence advantage
+60%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Away team

Starting lineup

2Luca Dellepianeoff 46'
5Mirko Saltarelli
7Matteo Ferrooff 85'16Andrea Sala
17Mirko Lazzarini🟨 1
18Luca Piana🟨 1
20Matteo De Rinaldis
21Alessandro Di Munnooff 33'
97Filippo Rosaoff 46'
99Giorgio Lionetti

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Gabriele MorelliOff: Lorenzo Vigiani
  2. VadoYellow cardLuca Piana
  3. PianeseYellow cardCarlo Maria Testa
  4. VadoSubstitutionOn: Diego TampieriOff: Alessandro Di Munno
  5. PianeseRed cardMichele Pezzolato
  6. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Gianluca AstaldiOff: Luca Fabrizi
  7. PianeseSubstitutionOn: Manuel TirelliOff: Matteo Colombo
  8. PianeseYellow cardMarco Bertini
  9. VadoYellow cardMirko Lazzarini
  10. VadoSubstitutionOn: Jacopo SimonettaOff: Matteo Ferro
  11. PianeseYellow cardLorenzo Masetti
  12. PianeseYellow cardFrancesco Proietto

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Pianese vs Vado?

The Serie C Group B match finished Pianese 0:0 Vado. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pianese vs Vado?

Pianese score 0.00 goals per game on average and Vado 2.00. The Serie C Group B average is 2.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Pianese's matches and 0% of Vado's.

What form are Pianese and Vado in?

Over the last 5 games Pianese have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Vado 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pianese vs Vado?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.