Pianese vs Vado: match statistics
Pianese vs Vado: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pianese played Vado in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match was played on 28 August 2026. Venue: Stadio Olimpico Carlo Zecchini. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Pianese: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. Vado: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pianese scores 0.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Vado scores 2.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 2.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pianese 0%, Vado 0%. Over 2.5: Pianese 0%, Vado 0%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.
xG, shots and style
Pianese has higher xG: 0.98 vs 0.80. Pianese: 9.0 shots per match, Vado: 7.0.
Match halves
Pianese: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Vado: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
Pianese: 0-15 (0 goals). Vado: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group B: 2.10 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vado made the stronger start to the season, winning their only match so far 2-0, while Pianese suffered a 0-2 defeat. In their last five matches, both teams have scored 6 goals, but the visitors won 2 games and averaged 1.4 points per match, compared with Pianese’s 1 victory and 1 point. Pianese conceded 7 goals during this period, while Vado conceded as many as 11, suggesting that both defences may give opponents opportunities. Vado’s advantage nevertheless stems from their current league result and a clean sheet in their opening match, making the visitors slight favourites, although a draw remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - No is marginally the stronger pick, as the league’s BTTS - Yes rate is only 25%, while the home side has kept a clean sheet in 100% of available home matches. Pianese have conceded an average of 1.4 goals over their last five games, but Vado have very limited creative potential, with an average xG of just 0.78 per match. However, both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of their last five matches, and each scored 1.2 goals per game during that period, which clearly increases the risk of an away goal. Nevertheless, Vado’s low attacking quality and the league’s defensive profile remain decisive, making the scenario in which at least one team fails to score more likely. BTTS - No means that at least one team does not score; it does not automatically mean a 0:0 result or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data from the last five matches indicates an average of 2.6 goals in Pianese games (6 scored and 7 conceded) and as many as 3.4 goals in Vado games (6 scored and 11 conceded). Despite the visitors’ weaker defense, their average xG over this period is only 0.78, while Pianese create chances worth 1.45 xG. The hosts have stayed below the 2.5-goal line in 4 of their last 5 matches, while the league average is just 2.0 goals per game, with only 25% of matches featuring at least three goals. This profile points to a game finishing with two or three goals, giving Under 3.5 goals a clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to Pianese leading at the break and holding on for the win, as the hosts were ahead after 45 minutes in 40% of their last five matches, while Vado were trailing at that stage in 50%. In the first halves, Pianese conceded an average of just 0.4 goals, compared with 1.5 for Vado, whose half-time goal difference stood at -3. The hosts scored an average of 0.6 goals after the break, while Vado managed only 0.25, limiting the visitors’ potential to recover from any deficit. However, both teams’ recent results have been inconsistent: Pianese averaged 1.0 point per match, while Vado averaged 1.4, meaning that Half-Time/Full-Time scenarios involving a draw at the break still retain a significant share. Seasonal data for the current matchup is based on a very small sample, so the hosts’ advantage is particularly clear in their first-half profile, but not strong enough to completely rule out an upset.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pianese | Vado | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 1.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pianese scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Vado keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).
Vado scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pianese
Over / Under - Vado
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pianese - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Vado - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pianese
Vado
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Pianese | Liga | Vado | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.10 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 40% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 30% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 35% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 0% | 70% | ▼ 0% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- PianeseYellow cardCarlo Maria Testa
- VadoYellow cardMirko Lazzarini
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Pianese vs Vado?
The Serie C Group B match finished Pianese 0:0 Vado. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pianese vs Vado?
Pianese score 0.00 goals per game on average and Vado 2.00. The Serie C Group B average is 2.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Pianese's matches and 0% of Vado's.
What form are Pianese and Vado in?
Over the last 5 games Pianese have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Vado 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pianese vs Vado?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


