Picerno vs Cosenza: match statistics
Picerno vs Cosenza: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Picerno play Cosenza in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match date is 13 April 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Picerno: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Cosenza: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Picerno scores 1.13 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Cosenza scores 1.53 and concedes 1.05. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Picerno 63%, Cosenza 58%. Over 2.5: Picerno 55%, Cosenza 53%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Cosenza has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.17. Picerno: 9.1 shots per match, Cosenza: 11.4.
Match halves
Picerno: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.42. Cosenza: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.95.
Goals by minute
Picerno: 16-30 (12 goals). Cosenza: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group C: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Cosenza are the clear favorite: the visitors sit 3rd in the table while Picerno are 16th, with a goal differential of 55–39 in Cosenza’s favor. In the last 5 matches Cosenza scored 7 goals and won 3 games (3-1-1), averaging 2.0 points per match, whereas Picerno have 4 goals and only 1 win in that period (avg. 1.0 point). Picerno’s home stats show 1.12 goals scored and 1.18 conceded per game, while Cosenza away average 1.06 scored and 1.12 conceded, so defensive figures are very similar, but season-long efficiency favors the visitors. xG values are also comparable (xG Picerno 1.34 vs 1.26 for Cosenza, with xG against 1.39 vs 1.41) and shots on target are close (3.41 vs 3.53), indicating few clear chances; additionally both teams fail to score in 29% of matches. Taking into account the higher league position, greater number of goals scored (55 vs 39) and better points-average over the last 5 games, I tip a Cosenza victory, although the high draw rate (53% for both sides) increases the likelihood of a shared point.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Picerno | Cosenza | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cosenza is 35% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Picerno · 1.53 goals / match - Cosenza
Cosenza is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.45 goals / match - Picerno · 1.05 goals / match - Cosenza
Picerno scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Cosenza keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).
Cosenza scores in 82% of matches (31 of 38 matches), while Picerno keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Picerno
Over / Under — Cosenza
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Picerno is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Picerno · 1.37 pts / match - Cosenza
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Picerno - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 24%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cosenza - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Picerno
Cosenza
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Picerno | Liga | Cosenza | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.58 | 2.49 | • 2.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 46% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 28% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 67% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 79% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Picerno 0 - 0 - 1 Cosenza. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Picerno vs Cosenza?
The Serie C Group C match finished Picerno 3:1 Cosenza. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Picerno vs Cosenza?
Picerno score 1.13 goals per game on average and Cosenza 1.53. The Serie C Group C average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Picerno's matches and 58% of Cosenza's.
What form are Picerno and Cosenza in?
Over the last 5 games Picerno have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Cosenza 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Picerno vs Cosenza?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Picerno vs Cosenza: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.