Picerno vs Monopoli: match statistics
Picerno vs Monopoli: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Picerno played Monopoli in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Picerno: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Monopoli: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Picerno scores 1.12 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. Monopoli scores 1.06 and concedes 1.09. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Picerno 64%, Monopoli 48%. Over 2.5: Picerno 55%, Monopoli 36%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Monopoli has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.16. Picerno: 9.0 shots per match, Monopoli: 9.7.
Match halves
Picerno: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.39. Monopoli: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.85.
Goals by minute
Picerno: 16-30 (10 goals). Monopoli: 46-60 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group C: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistics point to an even game with a draw bias: Picerno have high home draw rates (Draw% 50%) and low win rate (Win% 19%), while Monopoli show better recent form and higher PPG (1.4 vs 0.6). Both teams have similar xG and shots per match; visitors display weaker away finishing (0.88 goals/match, FTS 38%), limiting their offensive potential. Picerno concede 1.25 at home on average, Monopoli have similar GA away (1.19), so a low-scoring contest and difficulty breaking the opponent are expected. Considering the defensive balance and hosts’ draw history, a draw seems most likely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Home Picerno season BTTS 59% and a high number of goals conceded (ga_season_home 51) increase the risk of the opponent scoring. Monopoli last5 BTTS 80% and regular away goals (gf_last5_away 6, last5_seasonScoredAVG_overall_away 1.2). Similar xG (1.28 vs 1.22) and shot counts suggest both sides can create chances. Low CS rates (24% hosts, 38% visitors) and high last5 xG_against_home (1.58) further support both teams scoring. Overall form and stats point to BTTS = Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and shot averages point to a moderately offensive match with combined xG ~2.49, giving high probability for over 1.5 goals. Season Over 2.5 rates for both teams are near the threshold (35–38%), putting 2.5 around 50/50. Low conversion and relatively high goals conceded by Picerno plus Monopoli’s moderate capabilities favor goals but not extreme scores. A clearer signal is the low frequency of >3.5 games (only 12–19% season), so the safest option is Under 3.5. Summary: expected ~1–2 goals per team, low chance of 4+ goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data indicate a high probability of a draw at half-time (drawingAtHT ~50–53%), alongside Picerno’s second-half strength and better season home metrics (PPG, wins, xG). Picerno has a clear home advantage and wins more matches in the second half, supporting a comeback after HT and a home victory. Low opponent scoring efficiency before the break and a high share of second-half goals suggest X/1 as the strongest scenario. The probability of the visitors leading at HT is relatively small, so combinations starting with “2” are minimal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Picerno | Monopoli | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Monopoli is 133% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Picerno · 1.4 pts / match - Monopoli
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Picerno is 6% better for: goals scored per match.
1.12 goals / match - Picerno · 1.06 goals / match - Monopoli
Monopoli is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.55 goals / match - Picerno · 1.09 goals / match - Monopoli
Picerno scores in 73% of matches (24 of 33 matches), while Monopoli keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).
Monopoli scores in 73% of matches (24 of 33 matches), while Picerno keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Picerno
Over / Under - Monopoli
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Picerno is 87% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.48 pts / match - Picerno · 0.79 pts / match - Monopoli
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Picerno - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Monopoli - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Picerno
Monopoli
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Picerno | Liga | Monopoli | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.67 | 2.49 | ▼ 2.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 50% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 47% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 29% | • 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 66% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 79% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Picerno 1 - 0 - 0 Monopoli. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Picerno vs Monopoli?
The Serie C Group C match finished Picerno 0:0 Monopoli. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Picerno vs Monopoli?
Picerno score 1.12 goals per game on average and Monopoli 1.06. The Serie C Group C average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Picerno's matches and 48% of Monopoli's.
What form are Picerno and Monopoli in?
Over the last 5 games Picerno have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Monopoli 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Picerno vs Monopoli?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.