Italy - Serie BArena Garibaldi - Stadio Romeo AnconetaniData current as of 16 October 2026

Pisa vs Catanzaro: match statistics

Pisa crest
Pisa
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Catanzaro crest
Catanzaro

Pisa vs Catanzaro: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pisa played Catanzaro in Serie B (Italy). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Arena Garibaldi - Stadio Romeo Anconetani. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Pisa: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. Catanzaro: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pisa scores 0.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Catanzaro scores 2.00 and concedes 3.00. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pisa 0%, Catanzaro 100%. Over 2.5: Pisa 0%, Catanzaro 100%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Pisa has higher xG: 2.28 vs 1.52. Pisa: 22.0 shots per match, Catanzaro: 13.0.

Match halves

Pisa: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Catanzaro: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Pisa: 0-15 (0 goals). Catanzaro: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie B: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams have an identical record in their last five matches: 1 win, 1 draw and 3 defeats, with each side scoring 6 goals. Pisa should nevertheless dictate the game at home, averaging 22 shots and 7 shots on target per match, with 58% possession, while Catanzaro averages 13 attempts and 6 shots on target away from home. The hosts also create clearly better chances, as reflected by an xG of 2.28 compared with 1.52 for the visitors. However, Pisa’s lack of clinical finishing remains a key concern, as they failed to score in their only home match despite their high attacking potential. Catanzaro conceded 3 goals away from home against an xG against of 2.50, so the visitors’ defensive weaknesses give Pisa a realistic chance of securing their first win, although a draw remains a significant possibility.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by the current form of both teams: Pisa and Catanzaro have each scored 6 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 1.2 goals per game. At the same time, Pisa conceded 1.6 goals per match during this period, while Catanzaro conceded 1.8, indicating regular defensive gaps at both ends. BTTS landed in 60% of Pisa’s and 40% of Catanzaro’s last five matches, compared with a league average of 60%. Catanzaro’s season data is also offensively encouraging: the team scores an average of 2.0 goals, records an xG of 1.52, and has kept no clean sheets, although the limited sample size for the hosts calls for moderate confidence. Therefore, it is more likely that both teams will score at least one goal than that either side will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last five matches, Pisa averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Catanzaro recorded the same average of 1.2 goals scored but conceded 1.8. The latest xG figures point to an open game: Pisa created chances worth 1.27 xG, while Catanzaro allowed opponents 1.57 xG; at the other end, the figures stand at 1.42 and 1.31. Combined, the two teams posted goal tallies of 6:8 and 6:9 across these five fixtures, averaging 2.8 and 3.0 goals per match respectively—above the league average of 2.3. Over 1.5 offers the strongest edge, as the projected 2.79 goals and both teams’ vulnerable defenses strongly support at least two goals, while the Over/Under 2.5 line remains considerably more balanced.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Pisa hold a slight edge in the first halves: in their last five matches, they were leading at the break in 40% of games, compared with just 20% for Catanzaro, while the hosts averaged 1.2 goals before half-time against 0.6 for their opponents. Catanzaro went into half-time level in as many as 60% of their last five matches, making the draw outcome a serious alternative; however, Pisa’s greater first-half activity supports a home lead at the break. Both teams are in identical recent form, with a record of 1 win, 1 draw and 3 defeats in their last five matches, but Catanzaro concede an average of 1.8 goals per game, more than Pisa’s 1.6. After the break, Pisa have averaged no goals scored across their last five appearances, which reduces confidence in the pick, although Catanzaro also allow opponents to score 1.2 goals in this phase. The most likely scenario is therefore that Pisa capitalise on their stronger start and maintain a narrow lead until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
PisaCatanzaro
19Shots14
PisaCatanzaro
9Shots on target7
PisaCatanzaro
2.19xG1.7
PisaCatanzaro
6Corners8
PisaCatanzaro
51Dangerous attacks44
PisaCatanzaro
15Fouls12
PisaCatanzaro
3Cards2
PisaCatanzaro

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0Goals scored / match2
PisaCatanzaro
1Goals conceded / match3
PisaCatanzaro
58%Average possession53%
PisaCatanzaro
7Shots on target / match6
PisaCatanzaro

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

22Shots per match13
PisaCatanzaro
7Shots on target6
PisaCatanzaro
0%Shot conversion15.4%
PisaCatanzaro
58%Possession53%
PisaCatanzaro
2.28xG for1.52
PisaCatanzaro
1.16xG against2.5
PisaCatanzaro

Shooting quality

Pisa: DominantCatanzaro: Efficient finishing
PisaCatanzaro
Accuracy (shots on target)32%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pisa
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.28Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Catanzaro
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 2.50BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pisa is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Pisa · 3 goals / match - Catanzaro

Pisa scoring profile: mixed

Pisa scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Catanzaro keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Catanzaro scoring profile: very strong

Catanzaro scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Pisa keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

0Goals scored (season)2
PisaCatanzaro
1Goals conceded (season)3
PisaCatanzaro
1Average goals in match5
PisaCatanzaro
0Goals scored (last 5)2
PisaCatanzaro
1Goals conceded (last 5)3
PisaCatanzaro

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%2 goals100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%3 goals0%
PisaCatanzaro
0%4 goals0%
PisaCatanzaro

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%2 goals100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%3 goals100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%4 goals0%
PisaCatanzaro

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%BTTS in both halves100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%Scored in both halves100%
PisaCatanzaro

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PisaCatanzaro
0%BTTS - last 5100%
PisaCatanzaro

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PisaCatanzaro

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
PisaCatanzaro
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time100%
PisaCatanzaro

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pisa - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Catanzaro - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1
PisaCatanzaro
0Goals scored (1st half)1
PisaCatanzaro
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
PisaCatanzaro
0Average goals (1st half)2
PisaCatanzaro
100%Clean sheet before half-time0%
PisaCatanzaro
100%No goal before half-time0%
PisaCatanzaro

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per match (2nd half)0
PisaCatanzaro
0Goals scored (2nd half)1
PisaCatanzaro
1Goals conceded (2nd half)2
PisaCatanzaro
1Average goals (2nd half)3
PisaCatanzaro
0%Clean sheet after half-time0%
PisaCatanzaro
100%No goal after half-time0%
PisaCatanzaro

Pisa - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Catanzaro - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pisa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.01.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Catanzaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match2.03.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pisa
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Catanzaro
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pisa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-2.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-2.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Catanzaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.98
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
234%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).

Teams vs league

PisaLigaCatanzaro
Average goals in match▼ 1.002.67▲ 5.00
Both teams scored▼ 0%67%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%61%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▼ 0%17%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 0%78%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%83%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
67%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
17%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+-8%
Home attack advantage
+-9%
Home defence advantage
+-17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CatanzaroSubstitutionOn: Emile DorvalOff: Marco D'Alessandro
  2. CatanzaroGoalPietro IemmelloAssist: Antonio Candela
  3. PisaYellow cardSimone Zanon
  4. CatanzaroSubstitutionOn: Franck TchaounaOff: Antonio Candela
  5. CatanzaroSubstitutionOn: Ruggero FrosininiOff: Marco Ruggero
  6. PisaSubstitutionOn: Antonio Aldo CaraccioloOff: Rosen Bozhinov
  7. PisaYellow cardArturo Calabresi
  8. PisaYellow cardİsak Vural
  9. CatanzaroYellow cardJacopo Petriccione

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Pisa vs Catanzaro?

The Serie B match finished Pisa 2:1 Catanzaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pisa vs Catanzaro?

Pisa score 0.00 goals per game on average and Catanzaro 2.00. The Serie B average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Pisa's matches and 100% of Catanzaro's.

What form are Pisa and Catanzaro in?

Over the last 5 games Pisa have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Catanzaro 0-0-1 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pisa vs Catanzaro?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.