Pisa vs Como: match statistics
Como decisively outperforms Pisa across every statistical metric. The hosts sit 19th in the table with just 1 win all season and disastrous home form (11% win rate, failing to score in 89% of matches). Pisa averages a meager 0.11 goals per home game, while Como posts a solid 1.22 goals average on the road. The visitors occupy 6th place with an 8-6-3 record and significantly superior form (1.8 PPG in the last 5 matches vs 0.4 for Pisa). Como also dominates in possession (59% vs 44%), shot efficiency, and xG (1.41 vs 1.1). The gulf in class between these sides is evident, making a Como victory the most likely scenario.
Pisa vs Como: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pisa played Como in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 6 January 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Pisa: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Como: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pisa scores 0.72 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Como scores 1.35 and concedes 0.71. League average: 2.31 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pisa 39%, Como 35%. Over 2.5: Pisa 33%, Como 29%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 43%.
xG, shots and style
Como has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.05. Pisa: 9.9 shots per match, Como: 13.8.
Match halves
Pisa: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.39. Como: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.82.
Goals by minute
Pisa: 76-90+ (4 goals). Como: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie A: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 43%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Como decisively outperforms Pisa across every statistical metric. The hosts sit 19th in the table with just 1 win all season and disastrous home form (11% win rate, failing to score in 89% of matches). Pisa averages a meager 0.11 goals per home game, while Como posts a solid 1.22 goals average on the road. The visitors occupy 6th place with an 8-6-3 record and significantly superior form (1.8 PPG in the last 5 matches vs 0.4 for Pisa). Como also dominates in possession (59% vs 44%), shot efficiency, and xG (1.41 vs 1.1). The gulf in class between these sides is evident, making a Como victory the most likely scenario.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pisa | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 22% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Como is 350% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Pisa · 1.8 pts / match - Como
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Como is 88% better for: goals scored per match.
0.72 goals / match - Pisa · 1.35 goals / match - Como
Como is 96% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.39 goals / match - Pisa · 0.71 goals / match - Como
Pisa scores in 44% of matches (8 of 18 matches), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 matches).
Como scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while Pisa keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pisa
Over / Under - Como
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Como is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.94 pts / match - Pisa · 1.59 pts / match - Como
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pisa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 6%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Como - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pisa
Como
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Pisa | Liga | Como | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.11 | 2.31 | ▼ 2.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 39% | 47% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 43% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 32% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 64% | • 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 74% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Pisa vs Como?
The Serie A match finished Pisa 0:3 Como. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pisa vs Como?
Pisa score 0.72 goals per game on average and Como 1.35. The Serie A average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Pisa's matches and 35% of Como's.
What form are Pisa and Como in?
Over the last 5 games Pisa have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Como 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pisa vs Como?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pisa vs Como: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.